Habitat conversion affects beta diversity in frugivorous butterfly assemblages

References

• Andrade RB, Balch JK, Carreira JYO, Brando PM, Freitas VL. 2017. The impacts of recurrent fires on diversity of fruit-feeding butterflies in a south-eastern Amazon forest. J Trop Ecol. 33:22–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew ME, Wulder MA, Coops NC, Baillargeon G. 2012. Beta-diversity gradients of butterflies along productivity axes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 21:352–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmah S, Ghazali A, Syafiq M, Yahya MS, Peng TL, Norhisham AR, Puan CL, Azhar B, Lindenmayer DB. 2017. Effects of polyculture and monoculture farming in oil palm smallholdings on tropical fruit-feeding butterfly diversity. Agric For Entomol. 19:70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banda-R K, Delgado-Salinas A, Dexter KG, Linares-Palomino R, Oliveira-Filho A, Prado D, Pullan M, Quintana C, Ricarda R. 2016. Plant diversity patterns in neotropical dry forests and their conservation implications. Science. 353:1383–1388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beirão MV, Neves FS, Penz CM, DeVries PJ, Fernandes GW. 2017. High butterfly beta diversity between Brazilian cerrado and cerrado–caatinga transition zones. J Insect Conserv. 21:849–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonebrake TC, Ponisio LC, Boggs CL, Ehrlich PR. 2010. More than just indicators: A review of tropical butterfly ecology and conservation. Biol Conserv. 143:1831–1841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P. 2011. Numerical ecology with R. New York (NY): Springer Science+ Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Brito MM, Ribeiro DB. 2014. Functional composition and phenology of fruit-feeding butterflies in a fragmented landscape : variation of seasonality between habitat specialists. J Insect Conserv. 18:547–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubová T, Vrabec V, Kulma M, Nowicki P. 2015. Land management impacts on European butterflies of conservation concern: a review. J Insect Conserv. 19:805–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambui CEB, de Vasconcelos RN, Mariano-neto E, Viana BF, Cardoso MZ. 2017. Forest ecology and management positive forestry : the effect of rubber tree plantations on fruit feeding butterfly assemblages in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. For Ecol Manage. 397:150–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro A, Espinosa CI. 2015. Seasonal diversity of butterflies and its relationship with woody-plant resources availability in an Ecuadorian tropical dry forest. Trop Conserv Sci. 8:333–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro AAJF. 2007. Unidades de Planejamento: Uma Proposta para o Estado do Piauí com Base na Dimensão Diversidade de Ecossistemas. Publicações avulsas em Conserv Ecossistemas. 18:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Schmera D. 2015. Additive partitioning of a beta diversity index is controversial. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 112: 161–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Souza ML, Hebert PDN. 2018. Stable baselines of temporal turnover underlie high beta diversity in tropical arthropod communities. Mol Ecol. 27:2447–2460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decaëns T, Martins MB, Feijoo A, Oszwald J, Dolédec S, Mathieu J, Arnaud de Sartre X, Bonilla D, Brown GG, Cuellar Criollo YA, et al. 2018. Biodiversity loss along a gradient of deforestation in Amazonian agricultural landscapes. Conserv Biol. 32:1380–1391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDominicis S, Bonaiuto M, Carrus G, Passafaro P, Perucchini P, Bonnes M. 2017. Evaluating the role of protected natural areas for environmental education in Italy. Appl Environ Educ Commun. 16:171–185.
   Google Scholar
• DeFries RS, Rudel T, Uriarte M, Hansen M. 2010. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat Geosci. 3:178–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVries MFW. 2014. Linking species assemblages to environmental change : moving beyond the specialist-generalist dichotomy. Basic Appl Ecol. 15:279–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVries PJ, Alexander LG, Chacon IA, Fordyce JA. 2012. Similarity and difference among rainforest fruit-feeding butterfly communities in Central and South America. J Anim Ecol. 81:472–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos JP, Iserhard CA, Carreira JYO, Freitas AVL. 2017. Monitoring fruit-feeding butterfly assemblages in two vertical strata in seasonal Atlantic Forest: temporal species turnover is lower in the canopy. J Trop Ecol. 33:345–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekroos J, Heliola J, Kuussaari M. 2010. Homogenization of lepidopteran communities in intensively cultivated agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol. 47:459–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskildsen A, Carvalheiro LG, Kissling D, Biesmeijer JC, Schweiger O, Høye TT. 2015. Ecological specialization matters: long-term trends in butterfly species richness and assemblage composition depend on multiple functional traits. Divers Distrib. 21:792–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espírito-Santo MM, Sevilha AC, Anaya FC, Barbosa R, Fernandes GW, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Scariot A, Noronha SE de, Sampaio CA. 2009. Sustainability of tropical dry forests: two case studies in southeastern and central Brazil. For Ecol Manage. 258:922–930.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraro PJ, Hanauer MM, Miteva DA, Canavire-Bacarreza GJ, Pattanayak SK, Sims KRE. 2013. More strictly protected areas are not necessarily more protective : evidence from Bolivia, Costa Rica, Indonesia, and Thailand. Environ Res Lett. 8:025011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filgueiras BKC, Melo DHA, Leal IR, Tabarelli M, Freitas AVL, Iannuzzi L. 2016. Fruit-feeding butterflies in edge-dominated habitats: community structure, species persistence and cascade effect. J Insect Conserv. 20:539–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filgueiras BKC, Melo DHA, Uehara-prado M, Freitas AVL, Leal IR, Tabarelli M. 2019. Compensatory dynamics on the community structure of fruit-feeding butter fl ies across hyper-fragmented Atlantic Forest habitats. Ecol Indic. 98:276–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fordyce JA, DeVries PJ. 2016. A tale of two communities: neotropical butterfly assemblages show higher beta diversity in the canopy compared to the understory. Oecologia. 181:235–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Françoso RD, Brandão R, Nogueira CC, Salmona YB. 2015. Habitat loss and the effectiveness of protected areas in the Cerrado biodiversity hotspot. Braz J Nat Conserv. 3:35–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas AVL, Iserhard CA, Santos JP, Yasmin J, Carreira O, Ribeiro DB, Henrique D, Melo A, Henrique A, Rosa B, et al. 2014. Studies with butterfly bait traps : an overview. Rev Colomb Entomol. 40:209–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gozzi MR, Beirão MV, Medeiros LR, Neves FS, Fagundes M. 2012. Borboletas frugívoras em uma região de transição entre cerrado sensu stricto e caatinga no norte de Minas Gerais, Brasil. MGBiota. 4:25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Graça MB, Souza JLP, Franklin E, Morais JW, Pequeno PACL. 2017. Sampling effort and common species: optimizing surveys of understorey fruit-feeding butterflies in the Central Amazon. Ecol Indic. 73:181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray CL, Hill SLL, Newbold T, Hudson LN, Borger L, Contu S, Hoskins AJ, Ferrier S, Purvis A, Scharlemann JP. 2016. Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nat Commun. 7:12306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason D, Ekroos J, Öckinger E, Helenius J, Kuussaari M, Tiainen J, Smith HG, Lindborg R. 2017. Weak functional response to agricultural landscape homogenisation among plants, butterflies and birds. Ecography. 40:1221–1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewthwaite JMM, Debinski DM, Kerr JT. 2017. High community turnover and dispersal limitation relative to rapid climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 26:459–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magurran AE. 2013. Medindo a diversidade biólogia. Curitiba: UFPR.
   Google Scholar
• McGill BJ, Dornelas M, Gotelli NJ, Magurran AE. 2015. Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the anthropocene. Trends Ecol Evol. 30:104–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montejo-kovacevich G, Hethcoat MG, Lim FKS, Marsh CJ, Bonfantti D, Peres CA, Edwards DP. 2018. Impacts of selective logging management on butter fl ies in the Amazon. Biol Conserv 225: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobre CEB, Iannuzzi L, Schlindwein C. 2012. Seasonality of fruit-feeding butterflies (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) in a brazilian semiarid area. ISRN Zool. 2012:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Nobre CEB, Schlindwein C, Mielke OH. 2008. The butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea) of the Catimbau National Park, Pernambuco, Brazil. Zootaxa. 1751:35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Nyafwono M, Valtonen A, Nyeko P, Roininen H. 2014. Butterfly community composition across a successional gradient in a human-disturbed afro-tropical rain forest. Biotropica. 46:210–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira GCN, Coelho MS, do Vale Beirao M, Braga RF, Fernandes GW. 2017. Diversity of fruit-feeding butterflies in a mountaintop archipelago of rainforest. PLoS One. 12:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podani J, Ricotta C, Schmera D. 2013. A general framework for analyzing beta diversity, nestedness and related community-level phenomena based on abundance data. Ecol Complex. 15:52–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podani J, Schmera D. 2011. A new conceptual and methodological framework for exploring and explaining pattern in presence - absence data. Oikos. 120:1625–1638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro DB, Batista R, Prado PI, Brown KS, Freitas AVL. 2012. The importance of small scales to the fruit-feeding butterfly assemblages in a fragmented landscape. Biodivers Conserv. 21:811–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro DB, Freitas AVL. 2010. Differences in thermal responses in a fragmented landscape : temperature affects the sampling of diurnal, but not nocturnal fruit-feeding Lepidoptera. J Res Lepid. 42:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro DB, Freitas AVL. 2011. Large-sized insects show stronger seasonality than small-sized ones: A case study of fruit-feeding butterflies. Biol J Linn Soc. 104:820–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro Jr DB, Prado PI, Brown KS, Freitas AVL. 2008. Additive partitioning of butterfly diversity in a fragmented landscape: importance of scale and implications for conservation. Divers Distrib. 14:961–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro DB, Prado PI, Brown Jr KS, Freitas AVL. 2010. Temporal diversity patterns and phenology in fruit-feeding butterflies in the Atlantic Forest. Biotropica. 42:710–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambhu H, Northfield T, Nankishore A, Ansari A, Turton S. 2017. Tropical rainforest and human-modified landscapes support unique butterfly communities that differ in abundance and diversity. Environ Entomol. 46:1225–1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambhu H, Northfield TD, Nankishore A, Turton SM. 2018. Trade‐offs for butterfly alpha and beta diversity in human‐modified landscapes and tropical rainforests. Ecol Evol. 8:12918–12928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sant’Anna CLB, Ribeiro DB, Garcia LC, Freitas AVL. 2014. Fruit-feeding butterfly communities are influenced by restoration age in tropical forests. Restor Ecol. 22:480–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santo-Silva EE, Almeida WR, Tabarelli M, Peres CA. 2016. Habitat fragmentation and the future structure of tree assemblages in a fragmented Atlantic Forest landscape. Plant Ecol. 217:1129–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmel J, Fartmann T. 2014. Coastal heathland succession influences butterfly community composition and threatens endangered butterfly species. J Insect Conserv. 18:111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socolar JB, Gilroy JJ, Kunin WE, Edwards DP. 2016. How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation?. Trends Ecol Evol. 31:67–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soininen J, Lennon JJ, Hillebrand H. 2007. A multivariate analysis of beta diversity across organisms and environments. Ecology. 88:2830–2838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens VM, Trochet A, Blanchet S, Moulherat S, Clobert J, Baguette M. 2013. Dispersal syndromes and the use of life-histories to predict dispersal. Evol Appl. 6:630–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uehara-Prado M, Brown Jr KS, Freitas AVL. 2005. Biological traits of frugivorous butterflies in a fragmented and a continuous landscape in the south Brazilian Atlantic Forest. J Lepid Soc. 59:96–106.
   Google Scholar
• Uehara-Prado M, Brown KS, Freitas AVL. 2007. Species richness, composition and abundance of fruit-feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: comparison between a fragmented and a continuous landscape. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 16:43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerakoon B, Bandara AMRS, Ranawana K. 2015. Impact of canopy cover on butterfly abundance and diversity in intermediate zone forest of Sri Lanka. J Trop Environ. 5:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Yen JD, Fleishman E, Fogarty F, Dobkin DS. 2019. Relating beta diversity of birds and butterflies in the Great Basin to spatial resolution, environmental variables and trait- based groups. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 28:328–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellweger F, Roth T, Bugmann H, Bollmann K. 2017. Beta diversity of plants, birds and butterflies is closely associated with climate and habitat structure. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 26:898–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar