Forest amount determines the occupancy of the arboreal rodent Oecomys cleberi (Rodentia: Cricetidae) in Atlantic Forest fragmented landscapes

References

• Alho CJR, Pereira LA, Paula AC. 1986. Patterns of habitat utilization by small mammal populations in cerrado biome of central Brazil. Mammalia. 50: 447–460. doi:10.1515/mamm.1986.50.4.447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andren H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos. 71(3):355–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold TW. 2010. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s Information Criterion. J Wildl Manage. 74(6):1175–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks-Leite C, Pardini R, Tambosi LR, Pearse WD, Bueno AA, Bruscagin RT, Condez TH, Dixo M, Igari AT, Martensen AC, et al. 2014. Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot. Science. 345(6200): 1041–1045. doi:10.1126/science.1255768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrichelo LEG, Lima WP, Poggiani MM. 1992. Recomposição da vegetação com espécies arbórea nativas em reservatórios de usinas hidrelétricas da CESP. Série Técnica IPEF. 8:1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bivand R, Keitt T, Rowlingson B 2022. Rgdal: bindings for the ‘Geospatial’ data abstraction library. R package version 1.5-29. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgdal
   Google Scholar
• Bonvicino CR, Costa LP, Paglia A, Weksler M. 2019. Oecomys cleberi. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019. e.T15132A22370099. [accessed 2022 June 06]. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-1.RLTS.T15132A22370099.en
   Google Scholar
• Bovendorp RS, Villar N, Abreu‐junior EF, Bello C, Regolin AL, Percequillo AR, Galetti M. 2017. Atlantic small‐mammal: a dataset of communities of rodents and marsupials of the Atlantic forests of South America. Ecology. 2226. doi:10.1002/ecy.1893.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandão MV, Garbino GST, Rezende GC, Tenório SF, Reis SF. 2022. Taxonomic and natural history notes on Oecomys cleberi (Rodentia: Cricetidae) and first records in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ. 1–15. doi:10.1080/01650521.2022.2046962
   Google Scholar
• Burnham K, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Casagrande AF, Santos-Filho MD. 2019. Use of forest remnants and teak.Tectona grandis.plantations by small mammals in Mato Grosso Brazil. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ. 54(3):181–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro EBV, Fernandez FAS. 2004. Determinants of differential extinction vulnerabilities of small mammals in Atlantic Forest fragments in Brazil. Biol Conserv. 119: 73–80. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.023
   Google Scholar
• Delciellos AC, Vieira MV, Grelle CE, Cobra P, Cerqueira R. 2016. Habitat quality versus spatial variables as determinants of small mammal assemblages in Atlantic Forest fragments. J Mammal. 97(1):253–265.
   Google Scholar
• Derhé MA, Murphy HT, Preece ND, Lawes MJ, Menéndez R. 2017. Recovery of mammal diversity in tropical forests: a functional approach to measuring restoration. Restor Ecol. 26: 778–786. doi:10.1111/rec.12582
   Google Scholar
• Domingues M. 2012. Classificação da cobertura da terra da RPPN Foz do Rio Aguapeí: abordagem booleana para a integração de imagens TM-Landsat e dados multifonte [BSc thesis]. [Presidente Prudente (SP)]: Universidade Estadual Paulista.
   Google Scholar
• Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ, et al. 2013. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography. 36(1): 27–46. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estavillo C, Pardini R, da Rocha PLB. 2013. Forest loss and the biodiversity threshold: an evaluation considering species habitat requirements and the use of matrix habitats. PLoS ONE. 8(12):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo VV, Cunha NL, Morais AR, Terribile LC, Hannibal W. 2021. The importance of sampling methods and landscape variation on explaining small mammal communities in a Neotropical ecotone region. Mammal Res. 66(2):301–312.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske IJ, Chandler RB. 2011. unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. J Stat Softw. 43(10):1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González TM, González-Trujillo JD, Muñoz A, Armenteras D. 2021. Differential effects of fire on the occupancy of small mammals in neotropical savanna-gallery forests. Perspect Ecol Conserv. 19(2):179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D, Moore R. 2017. Google Earth Engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens Environ. 202: 18–27. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez EE, Marinho-Filho J. 2017. The mammalian faunas endemic to the Cerrado and the Caatinga. ZooKeys. 644: 105–157. doi:10.3897/zookeys.644.10827.
   Google Scholar
• Hannibal W, Cunha NLD, Figueiredo VV, Teresa FB, Ferreira VL. 2019. Traits reveal how habitat‐quality gradients structure small mammal communities in a fragmented tropical landscape. Austral Ecol. 45(1):79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature. 396(6706):41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesselbarth MHK, Sciaini M, With KA, Wiegand K, Nowosad J. 2019. landscapemetrics: an open-source R tool to calculate landscape metrics. Ecography. 42: 1648–1657 (ver. 0). doi:10.1111/ecog.04617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans RJ 2022. raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 3.5-15. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster
   Google Scholar
• IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2004. Mapa de Vegetação do Brasil. https://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/informacoes_ambientais/vegetacao/mapas/brasil/vegetacao.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jackson HB, Fahrig L. 2015. Are ecologists conducting research at the optimal scale? Glob. Ecol Biogeogr. 24(1):52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Legendre LF. 1998. Numerical ecology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam (NH): Elsevier. English Editon.
   Google Scholar
• Locks M. 1981. Nova espécie de Oecomys de Brasília, DF, Brasil (Cricetidae, Rodentia). Bol Mus Nac Rio de Janeiro. 300:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie DI, Bailey LL. 2004. Assessing the fit of site-occupancy models. J Agric Biol Environ Stat. 9: 300–318. doi:10.1198/108571104X3361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle AA, Langtimm CA. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology. 83: 2248–2255. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Royle JA, Pollock KH, Bailey L, Hines JE. 2006. Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. New York (NY): Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mazerolle MJ 2020. AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.3-1. https://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland TM, Mathewson HA, Groce JE, Morrison ML, Newnam JC, Snelgrove RT, Skow K, Collier BA, Wilkins RN. 2012. Utilization of a species occupancy model for management and conservation. Wildl Soc Bull. 36(3):432–439.
   Google Scholar
• Melo GL, Sponchiado J, Cáceres NC, Fahrig L. 2017. Testing the habitat amount hypothesis for South American small mammals. Biol Conserv. 209: 304–314. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.031
   Google Scholar
• Morales-Díaz SP, Alvarez-Añorve MY, Zamora-Espinoza ME, Dirzo R, Oyama K, Avila-Cabadilla LD. 2019. Rodent community responses to vegetation and landscape changes in early successional stages of tropical dry forest. For Ecol Manag. 433: 633–644. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.11.037
   Google Scholar
• Morin DJ, Yackulic CB, Diffendorfer JE, Lesmeister DB, Nielsen CK, Reid J, Schauber EM. 2020. Is your ad hoc model selection strategy affecting your multimodel inference?. Ecosphere. 11(1):e02997.
   Google Scholar
• Pardini R, de Bueno AA, Gardner TA, Prado PI, Metzger JP. 2010. Beyond the fragmentation threshold hypothesis: regime shifts in biodiversity across fragmented landscapes. PLoS One. 5: 10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013666
   Google Scholar
• Patton JL, Pardiñas UF, D’Elía G. 2015. Mammals of South America volume 2: rodents. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piccin P 2019. IPÊ -Institute of Ecological Research Annual Report. Available from: https://www.ipe.org.br/ra2019/localidade.html
   Google Scholar
• Pires AS, Lira P, Fernandez FAS, Schittini GM, Oliveira LC. 2002. Frequency of movements of small mammals among Atlantic Coastal Forest fragments in Brazil. Biol Conserv. 108: 229–237. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00109-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Projeto MapBiomas. 2014. Coleção 6 da Série Anual de Mapas de Cobertura e Uso de Solo do Brasil. [accessed 2022 Apr 8]. http://mapbiomas.org
   Google Scholar
• QGIS. QGIS Development Team. 2020. QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS Association. http://www.qgis.org
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (Austria). https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro SE, Almeida-Rocha JM, Weber MM, Kajin M, Lorini ML, Cerqueira R. 2021. Do anthropogenic matrix and life-history traits structure small mammal populations? A meta-analytical approach. Conserv Genet. 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10592-021-01352-3
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro JF, Guaraldo A, Nardoto GB, Santoro G, Vieira EM. 2019. Habitat type and seasonality influence the isotopic trophic niche of small mammals in a neotropical savanna. Hystrix. 30(1):30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro JF, Walter BMT. 1998. Fitofisionomias do bioma cerrado In: cerrado: ambiente e flora. Planaltina (DF): EMBRAPA-CPAC. p. 89–166.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha ÉGD, Brigatti E, Niebuhr BB, Ribeiro MC, Vieira MV. 2021. Dispersal movement through fragmented landscapes: the role of stepping stones and perceptual range. Landsc Ecol. 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10980-021-01310-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rocha RG, Fonseca C, Zhou Z, Leite YL, Costa LP. 2012. Taxonomic and conservation status of the elusive Oecomys cleberi (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) from central Brazil. Mamm Biol. 77(6):414–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Filho M, da Silva DJ, Sanaiotti TM. 2008. Edge effects and landscape matrix use by a small mammal community in fragments of semideciduous submontane forest in Mato Grosso Brazil. Bra J Biol. 68: 703–710. doi:10.1590/S1519-69842008000400004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santos-Filho M, Frieiro-Costa F, Ignácio ARA, Silva MNF. 2012. Use of habitats by non-volant small mammals in Cerrado in Central Brazil. Braz J Biol. 72: 893–902. doi:10.1590/S1519-69842012000500016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Secretariat of the Environment. 2013. Anuário das Reservas Particulares do. Patrimônio Natural Instituídas pela Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo. São Paulo (SP): Fundação Florestal.
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the Environment. 2016. Resolução SMA n° 52 de 31 de maio de 2016 Retifica o artigo 1° da Resolução SMA n° 117 de 09 de dezembro de 2010 que reconheceu a Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural “Foz do Rio Aguapeí” localizada nos municípios de Castilho São João do Pau D’Alho e Paulicéia. São Paulo (SP): Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Semper-Pascual A, Decarre J, Baumann M, Camino M, Di Blanco Y, Gómez-Valencia B, Kuemmerle T. 2020. Using occupancy models to assess the direct and indirect impacts of agricultural expansion on species’ populations. Biodivers Conserv. 29(13):3669–3688.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini VN, Priotto JW, Gomez MD. 2019. Effects of agroecosystem landscape complexity on small mammals: a multi-species approach at different spatial scales. Landsc Ecol. 34(5):1117–1129.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker CJ. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ. 8(2):127–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umetsu F, Pardini R. 2007. Small mammals in a mosaic of forest remnants and anthropogenic habitats - Evaluating matrix quality in an Atlantic forest landscape. Landsc Ecol. 22: 517–530. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9041-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead T, Goosem M, Preece ND. 2014. Use by small mammals of a chronosequence of tropical rainforest revegetation. Wildl Res. 41: 233–242. doi:10.1071/WR14082
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Williams-Linera G, Bonilla-Moheno M, López-Barrera F, Tolome J. 2021. Litterfall vegetation structure and tree composition as indicators of functional recovery in passive and active tropical cloud forest restoration. For Ecol Manag. 493: 119260. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119260
   Google Scholar