4,154
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Herd level approach to high bulk milk somatic cell count problems in dairy cattle

, , &
Pages 82-93 | Received 06 Mar 2013, Accepted 23 Apr 2013, Published online: 24 May 2013

References

  • Allore HG, Erb HN, Schruben LW, Oltenacu PA. 1998. A simulation of strategies to lower bulk tank somatic cell count below 500,000 cells per milliliter. J Dairy Sci. 81: 694–702.
  • Barkema HW. 1999. Udder health on dairy farms. 1. Results of a longitudinal study on 300 Dutch farms. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 124: 338–344.
  • Barkema HW, Green MJ, Bradley AJ, Zadoks RN. 2009. Invited review: The role of contagious disease in udder health. J Dairy Sci. 92: 4717–4729.
  • Barkema HW, Ploeg JD van der, Schukken YH, Lam TJ, Benedictus G, Brand A. 1999. Management style and its association with bulk milk somatic cell count and incidence of clinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 82: 1655–1663.
  • Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Lam TJGM, Beiboer ML, Wilmink H, Benedictus, G, Brand A. 1998a. Incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy herds grouped in three categories by bulk milk somatic cell counts. J Dairy Sci. 81: 411–419.
  • Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Lam TJGM, Beiboer ML, Benedictus G, Brand A. 1998b. Management practices associated with low, medium, and high somatic cell counts in bulk milk. J Dairy Sci. 81: 1917–1927.
  • Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Zadoks RN. 2006. Invited review: The role of cow, pathogen, treatment and study characteristics in the success of treatment of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 89: 1877–1895.
  • Borm AA, Fox LK, Leslie KE, Hogan JS, Andrew SM, Moyes KM, Oliver SP, Schukken YH, Hancock DD, Gaskins CT, et al. 2006. Effects of prepartum intramammary antibiotic therapy on udder health, milk production, and reproductive performance in dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci. 89: 2090–2098.
  • Brand A, Noordhuizen JPTM, Schukken YH. 1996. Herd health and production management in dairy practice. Wageningen: Wageningen Pers.
  • Cook WF, Fiez EA, Fox LK. 1992. Mastitis in first lactation southwest Idaho dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 75 (Suppl. 1): 158.
  • De Vliegher S, Barkema HW, Stryhn H, Opsomer G, De Kruif A. 2004. Impact of early lactation somatic cell count in heifers on somatic cell counts over the first lactation. J Dairy Sci. 87: 3672–3682.
  • De Vliegher S, Fox LK, Piepers S, McDougall S, Barkema HW. 2012. Invited review: Mastitis in dairy heifers: Nature of the disease, potential impact, prevention, and control. J Dairy Sci. 95: 1025–1040.
  • Djabri B, Bareille N, Beaudeau F, Seegers H. 2002. Quarter milk somatic cell count in infected dairy cows: a meta-analysis. Vet Res. 33: 335–357.
  • Dufour S, Dohoo IR. 2012. Monitoring dry period intramammary infection incidence and elimination rates using somatic cell count measurements. J Dairy Sci. 95: 7173–7185.
  • Dufour S, Fréchette A, Barkema HW, Mussell A, Scholl DT. 2011. Invited review: effect of udder health management practices on herd somatic cell count. J Dairy Sci. 94: 563–579.
  • Eberhart RJ, Hutchinson LJ, Spencer SB. 1982. Relationships of bulk tank somatic cell counts to prevalence of intramammary infection to indices of herd production. J Food Prot. 45: 1125–1128.
  • Goff JP. 2006. Major advances in our understanding of nutritional influences on bovine health. J Dairy Sci. 89: 1292–1301.
  • Green LE, Schukken YH, Green MJ. 2006. On distinguishing cause and consequence: Do high somatic cell counts lead to lower milk yield or does high milk yield lead to lower somatic cell count? Prev Vet Med. 76: 74–89.
  • Halasa T, Nielen M, van Werven T, Hogeveen H. 2010. Simulation model to calculate costs and benefits of dry period interventions in dairy cattle. Livest Prod Sci. 129: 80–87.
  • Halasa T, Nielen M, Whist AC, Osteras O. 2009. Meta-analysis of dry cow management for dairy cattle. Part 2. Cure of existing intramammary infections. J Dairy Sci. 92: 3150–3157.
  • Hillerton JE, Bramley AJ, Staker RT, McKinnon CH. 1995. Patterns of intramammary infection and clinical mastitis over a 5 year period in a closely monitored herd applying mastitis control measures. J Dairy Res. 62: 39–50.
  • Hillerton JE, Shearn MF, Teverson RM, Langridge S, Booth JM. 1993. Effect of pre-milking teat dipping on clinical mastitis on dairy farms in England. J Dairy Res. 60: 31–41.
  • Hovinen M, Pyörälä S. 2011. Invited review: Udder health of dairy cows in automatic milking. J Dairy Sci. 94: 547–562.
  • International Committee for Animal Recording. 2012. Yearly enquiry on the situation of milk recording in member countries–Results for the years 2010 and 2011. [cited 2013 March]. Available from: www.icar.org/Documents/Yearly%20inquiry/2010-2011/Cow%20Survey%202010- 2011.pdf
  • Jansen J, Steuten CDM, Renes RJ, Aarts N, Lam TJGM. 2010. Debunking the myth of the hard-to-reach farmer: Effective communication on udder health. J Dairy Sci. 93: 1296–1306.
  • Jansen, J, Lam, TJGM. 2012. The role of communication in improving udder health. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 28: 363–379.
  • Johnson AP. 2000. A proper milking routine: the key to quality milk. [monograph on the Internet]. NMC, Verona, WI, US. [Cited 2013 March]. Available from: www.nmconline.org/articles/keyqlty.htm
  • Jones GM. 1999. Guidelines to culling cows with mastitis. Virginia State University, VI, USA. [Cited 2013 March]. Available from: www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/dairy/404-204/404-204.html
  • Kruze J, Ceballos A, Stryhn H, Mella A, Matamoros R, Contreras pA, Leyan V, Wittwer F. 2007. Somatic cell count in milk of selenium-supplemented dairy cows after an intramammary challenge with Staphylococcus aureus. J Vet Med A. 54: 478–483.
  • Lam TJGM, Grijsen EG, Schukken YH, Kaal-Lansbergen L, Hogeveen H. 1998. Mastitis management planner: a new approach to mastitis in dairy herds. Proceedings 20th World Buiatrics Conference; Sydney, Australia, 251–254.
  • Lam TJGM, Jansen J, van den Borne BHP, Renes RJ, Hogeveen H. 2011. What veterinarians need to know about communication to optimise their role as advisors on udder health in dairy herds. New Zeal Vet J. 59: 8–15.
  • Lam TJGM, Wuijckhuise LA, Franken P, Morselt ML, Hartman EG, Schukken YH. 1996. Use of composite milk samples for diagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 208: 1705–1708.
  • Laureyns J, Piepers S, Ribbens S, Sarrazin S, De Vliegher S, Van Crombrugge JM, Dewulf J. 2013. Association between herd exposure to BVDV-infection and bulk milk somatic cell count of Flemish dairy farms. Prev Vet Med. 109: 148–151.
  • Lievaart JJ, Barkema HW, Hogeveen H, Kremer WDJ. 2009. Reliability of the bulk milk somatic cell count as an indication of average herd somatic cell count. J Dairy Res. 76: 490–496..
  • Lievaart JJ, Kremer WDJ, Barkema HW. 2007. Comparison of bulk milk, yield-corrected, and average somatic cell counts as parameters to summarize the subclinical mastitis situation in a dairy herd. J Dairy Sci. 90: 4145–4148.
  • Loeffler SH, Lam TJ, Barkema HW, Scholten D, Hessels AL, van Kestel AM. 1995. The dairying veterinarian approach to a high bulk milk somatic cell count caused by Streptococcus agalactiae. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 120: 458–463.
  • McDermott MP, Erb HN, Natzke RP. 1982. Predictability by somatic cell counts related to prevalence of intramammary infections within herds. J Dairy Sci. 65: 1535–1539.
  • Mein GA. 1998. Simple checks of a milking system. Verona, WI, USA: NMC. [Cited 2013 March]. Available from: www.nmconline.org/articles/simplechks.htm
  • Neave FK, Dodd FH, Kingwell RG, Westgarth DR. 1969. Control of mastitis in the dairy herd by hygiene and management. J Dairy Sci. 52: 696–706.
  • Norman HD, Lombard JE, Wright JR, Kopral CA, Rodriguez JM, Miller RH. 2011. Consequence of alternative standards for bulk tank somatic cell count of dairy herds in the United States. J Dairy Sci. 94: 6243–6256.
  • Norman HD, Miller RH, Ross, Jr., FA. 2013. Somatic cell counts of milk from Dairy Herd Improvement herds during 2012. USDA AIPL Research Report SCC14 (2-13). [Cited 2013 March]. Available from: aipl.arsusda.gov/publish/dhi/dhi13/sccrpt.htm
  • Ohnstad I, Olde Riekerink RG, Hogewerf P, de Koning CA, Barkema HW. 2012. Short communication: Effect of automatic postmilking teat disinfection and cluster flushing on the milking work routine. J Dairy Sci. 95: 2567–2570.
  • Olde Riekerink RGM, Barkema HW, Kelton DF, Keefe GP, Scholl DT. 2006. Risk factors for herd-level infections of contagious mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms. Proceedings of the 11th Symposium of the International Society of Veterinary Epidemiology and Econonics; Cairns, Australia, 598.
  • Olde Riekerink RGM, Barkema HW, Kelton DF, Scholl DT. 2008. Incidence rate of clinical mastitis on Canadian dairy farms. J Dairy Sci. 91: 1366–1377.
  • Olde Riekerink RGM, Barkema HW, Stryhn H. 2007. The effect of season on somatic cell count and the incidence of clinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 90: 3733–3741.
  • Osteras O, Solverod L, Reksen O. 2006. Milk culture results in a large Norwegian survey–effects of season, parity, days in milk, resistance, and clustering. J Dairy Sci. 89: 1010–1023.
  • Parker KI, Compton CW, Anniss FM, Heuer C, McDougall S. 2007. Subclinical and clinical mastitis in heifers following the use of a teat sealant precalving. J Dairy Sci. 90: 207–218.
  • Piepers S, De Meulemeester L, de Kruif A, Opsomer G, Barkema HW, de Vliegher S. 2007. Prevalence and distribution of mastitis pathogens in subclinically infected dairy cows in Flanders, Belgium. J Dairy Res. 74: 478–483.
  • Piepers S, Opsomer G, Barkema HW, de Kruif A, De Vliegher S. 2010. Heifers infected with coagulase-negative staphylococci in early lactation have fewer cases of clinical mastitis and higher milk production in their firs lactation than non-infected heifers. J Dairy Sci. 93: 2014–2024.
  • Pinzón-Sánchez C, Cabrera VE, Ruegg PL. 2011. Decision tree analysis of treatment strategiesfor mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis occuring in early lactation. J Dairy Sci. 94: 1873–1892.
  • Pitkala A, Haveri M, Pyorala S, Myllys V, Honkanen-Buzalski T. 2004. Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001–prevalence, distribution of bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance. J Dairy Sci. 87: 2433–2441.
  • Rodrigues AC, Ruegg PL. 2005. Actions and outcomes of Wisconsin dairy farms completing milk quality teams. J Dairy Sci. 88: 2672–2680.
  • Sampimon O, Barkema HW, Berends I, Sol J, Lam TJGM. 2009. Prevalence of intramammary infection in Dutch dairy herds. J Dairy Res. 76: 129–136.
  • Sargeant JM, Schukken YH, Leslie KE. 1998. Ontario bulk milk somatic cell count reduction program: progress and outlook. J Dairy Sci. 81: 1545–1554.
  • Seymour EH, Jones GM, McGilliard ML. 1989. Effectiveness of intramammary antibiotic therapy based on somatic cell count. J Dairy Sci. 72: 1057–1061.
  • Sol J. 2002. Cure of Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in Dutch dairy cows [ PhD thesis]. The Netherlands: Utrecht University.
  • Sol J, Sampimon OC, Barkema HW, Schukken YH. 2000. Factors associated with cure after therapy of clinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. J Dairy Sci. 83: 278–284.
  • St Rose SG, Swinkels JM, Kremer WD, Kruitwagen CL, Zadoks RN. 2003. Effect of penethamate hydriodide treatment on bacteriological cure, somatic cell count and milk production of cows and quarters with chronic subclinical Streptococcus uberis or Streptococcus dysgalactiae infection. J Dairy Res. 70: 387–394.
  • Supré K, Haesebrouck F, Zadoks RN, Vaneechoutte M, Piepers S, De Vliegher S. 2011. Some coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species affect udder health more than others. J Dairy Sci. 94: 2329–2340.
  • Swinkels JM, Rooijendijk RG, Zadoks RN, Hogeveen H. 2005. Use of partial budgeting to determine the economic benefits of antibiotic treatment of chronic subclinical mastitis caused by Streptococcus uberis or Streptococcus dysgalactiae. J Dairy Res. 72: 75–85.
  • Van den Borne BHP, Vernooij JCM, Lupindu AM, van Schaik G, Frankena K, Lam TJGM, Nielen M. 2011. Relationship between somatic cell count status and subsequent clinical mastitis in Dutch dairy cows. Prev Vet Med. 102: 265–273.
  • Wallace JA, Schukken YH, Welcome F. 2003. Measuring stimulation's effect with milk flow curves. Proceedings of the 42ndAnnual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council, Forth Worth, TX, USA, 86–97. National Mastitis Council; Verona, WI, USA.
  • Weiss WP, Hogan JS, Smith KL, Hoblet KH. 1990. Relationships among selenium, vitamin E, and mammary gland health in commercial dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 73: 381–390.
  • White LJ, Lam TJGM, Schukken YH, Green LE, Medley GF, Chappell MJ. 2006. The transmission and control of mastitis in dairy cows: A theoretical approach. Prev Vet Med. 74: 67–83.
  • Wilson DJ, Das HH, Gonzalez RN, Sears PM. 1997. Association between management practices, dairy herd characteristics, and somatic cell count of bulk tank milk. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 210: 1499–1502.
  • Zadoks RN, Allore HG, Hagenaars TJ, Barkema HW, Schukken YH. 2002. A mathematical model of Staphylococcus aureus control in dairy herds. Epidemiol Infect. 129: 397–416.
  • Zadoks RN, Gonzalez RN, Boor KJ, Schukken YH. 2004. Mastitis-causing streptococci are important contributors to bacterial counts in raw bulk tank milk. J Food Prot. 67: 2644–2650.
  • Zadoks RN, Schulte HF, Tikofsky-Garrison LL. 2005. Molecular tools enhance the value of bulk tank milk monitoring. Proceedings 44th Annual Meeting of the NMC, Orlando, FL, USA, 86–93, NMC, Verona, WI, USA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.