Estimating Quality-Adjusted Life Year Losses Associated with Visual Field Deficits Using Methodological Approaches

REFERENCES

• Brown M M, Brown G C, Sharma S, Busbee B. Quality of life associated with visual loss: A time tradeoff utility analysis comparison with medical health states. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 1076–1081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M M, Brown G C, Sharma S. Quality of life with visual acuity loss from diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 481–484
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown M M, Brown G C, Sharma S, Kistler J, Brown H. Utility values associated with blindness in an adult population. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 327–331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M M, Brown G C, Sharma S, Hollands H, Landy J. Quality of life and systemic comorbidities in patients with ophthalmic disease. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 8–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown G C, Sharma S, Brown M M, Kistler J. Utility values and age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 47–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Brown G C, Brown M M, Shah G K, Snow K, Brown H, Hollands H. Converting visual acuity to utilities. Can J Ophthalmol 2000; 35: 267–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M M, Brown G C, Sharma S, Landy J. Health care economic analyses and value-based medicine. Surv Ophthalmol 2003; 48: 204–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciosek M, Coffield A B, Edwards N M, Flottemesch T J, Goodman M J, Solberg L I. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: Results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prev Med 2006; 31: 52–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom S, Buchholz P, Walt J, Wickstrom J, Aagren M. The cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost, latanoprost and timolol in treatment of primary open angle glaucoma in five European countries. Curr Med Res Opin 2006; 22: 897–905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters A, Schouten J S, Webers C A, Prins M H, Hendrikse F, Severens J L. Cost-effectiveness of early detection and treatment of ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma by the ophthalmologist. Eye 2006, Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.4702637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymes S M, Kass M A, Anderson D R, Miller J P, Gordon M O. Ocular Hypertension Study Group. Management of ocular hypertension: A cost-effectiveness approach from the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 997–1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jampel H D, Friedman D S, Quigley H, Miller R. Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1059–1067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramrattan R S, Wolfs R CW, Panda-Jonas S, Jonas J B, Bakker D, Pols H A, Hofman A, De Jong P TVM. Prevalence and causes of visual field loss in the elderly and associations with impairment in daily functioning: The Rotterdam Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1788–1794
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGwin G, Xie A Y, Mays A, Joiner W, Decarlo D K, Hall T A, Owsley C. Visual field defects and the risk of motor vehicle collisions among patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 4437–4441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haymes S A, Le Blanc R P, Nicolela M T, Lavender S A, Chauhan B C. Risk of falls and motor vehicle collisions in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 1149–1155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jampel H D, Schwartz A, Pollack I, Abrams D, Weiss H, Miller R. Glaucoma patients' assessment of their visual function and quality of life. J Glaucoma 2002; 11: 154–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobelt G, Jonsson B, Bergstrom A, Chen E, Linden C, Alm A. Cost-effectiveness analysis in glaucoma: What drives utility? Results from a pilot study in Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006; 84: 363–371
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan P W, Lawrence W F, Ghushchyan V. A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care 2005; 43: 736–749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magacho L, Lima F E, Nery A CS, Sagawa A, Magacho B, Avila M P. Quality of life in glaucoma patients: Regression analysis and correlation with possible modifiers. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2004; 11: 263–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Visual Impairments: Determining Eligibility for Social Security Benefits, Susan B. Van Hemel. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 2002, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Disability Determination for Individuals with Visual Impairments. Peter Lennie
   Google Scholar
• Cello K E, Nelson-Quigg J M, Johnson C A. Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry for Detection of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss. Am J Ophthal 2000; 129: 314–322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson-Quigg J M, Cello K, Johnson C A. Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 2212–2221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson C A, Keltner J L, Balestrery F G. Acuity profile perimetry. Description of technique and preliminary clinical trials. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 260–272
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson C A, Keltner J L, Balestrery F G. Static and acuity profile perimetry at various adaptation levels. Documenta Ophthalmologica 1981; 50: 371–388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan L L. Measurement of visual acuity. A critical review. Arch Ophthalmol 1951; 45: 704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krekelberg B, Van Wezel R JA, Albright T D. Interactions between speed and contrast tuning in the middle temporal area: Implications for the neural code for speed. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 8988–8998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary P A, Beck R W, Bourque L B, Backlund J YC, Miskala P H. Visual Symptoms after Optic Neuritis Results from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. J Neuro-Ophthal 1997; 17: 18–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulhorn E, Harms H. Visual Perimetry (Chapter 5). Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1972; Vol. VII/4: 102–145, Visual Psychophysics
   Google Scholar
• Johnson C A, Casson E J. Effects of luminance, contrast and blur on visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 864–869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar