References
- Yi Z, Ping T, Gu B, Yi X, Li B, Li Y. Causes and implications of the recent increase in the reported sex ratio at birth in China. Popul Dev Rev 1991; 19: 283–302.
- Park CB, Cho N-H. Consequences of son preference in a low fertility society: the imbalance of the sex ratio at birth in Korea. Popul Dev Rev 1995; 21: 59–84.
- Goodkind D. On substituting sex preference strategies in East Asia: does prenatal sex selection reduce postnatal discrimination? Popul Dev Rev 1996; 22: 111–125.
- Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, United Nations Population Fund. Missing…, mapping the adverse child sex ratio in India; 2003.
- George S. Attitudes to and practices regarding sex selection in India. Symposium Policies and practices of sex selection. Anticipating the impact of early non-invasive testing. 6 July 2005, London.
- MicroSort. Current Results. Available: http://www.microsort. net. Accessed 14–9-2005.
- Jain T, Missmer SA, Gupta RS, Hornstein MD. Preimplantation sex selection demand and preference in an infertility population. Fertility and Sterility 2002; 83: 649–858.
- Swetkis D, Gilroy FD, Steinbacher R. (2002). Firstborn preference and attitudes toward using sex selection technology. J Genetic Psychol 2005; 163: 228–238.