References
- Yoon P W, Chen B, Faucett A, Clyne M, Gwinn M, Lubin I M, Burke W, Khoury M J. Public health impact of genetic tests at the end of the 20th century. Genetics in Medicine 2001; 3: 405–410
- Kunk R M. Expanding the newborn screen: terrific or troubling?. MCN American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing 1998; 23: 266–271
- Cederbaum S, Vilain E. Newborn screening for inborn errors of metabolism is going to expand: are we ready?. Journal of Pediatrics 1999; 134: 666–667
- Wilcken B M. Does every baby get a newborn screening test?. Medical Journal of Australia 2003; 179: 400–401
- McLaughin G. SMOG grading—a new readability formula. Journal of Reading 1969; 12: 639–646
- Riley M, Halliday J L, Victorian Perinatal Data Collection Unit. Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality and Morbidity. Births in Victoria 1999–2000. Perinatal Data Collection Unit Public Health Dept. of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria 2001
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. Year Book Australia. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra 2001; 164, 2001
- Glasser M, Bazuin C H. Patients' views of the medical education setting. Journal of Medical Education 1985; 60: 745–756
- Grasby D, Quinlivan J A. Attitudes of patients towards the involvement of medical students in their intrapartum obstetric care. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001; 41: 91–96
- Mulvey S, Wallace E M. Levels of knowledge of Down syndrome and Down syndrome testing in Australian women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001; 41: 167–169
- Suriadi C, Jovanovska M, Quinlivan J A. Mother's knowledge of genetic screening. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2004; 44: 30–34
- Brunger J W, Murray G S, O'Riordan M, Matthews A L, Smith R J, Robin N H. Parental attitudes toward genetic testing for pediatric deafness. American Journal of Human Genetics 2000; 67: 1621–1625
- Braczkowski R, Nowakowska-Zajdel E, Zubelewicz B, Muc-Wierzgon M, Romanowski W. Genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: Polish women's attitudes. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 1998; 17: 299–302
- Press N A, Yasui Y, Reynolds S, Durfy S J, Burke W. Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility may be based on unrealistic expectations. American Journal of Medical Genetics 2001; 99: 99–110
- Hall M A, Rich S S. Laws restricting health insurer' use of genetic information: impact on genetic discrimination. American Journal of Human Genetics 2000; 66: 293–307
- Truog R D. Is “informed right of refusal” the same as “informed consent”?. Journal of Clinical Ethics 1996; 7: 87–89
- Holtzman N A, Faden R, Chwalow A J, Horn S D. Effect of informed parental consent on mothers' knowledge of newborn screening. Pediatrics 1983; 72: 807–812
- Jallinoja P, Hakonen A, Aro A R, Niemela P, Hietala M, Lonnqvist J, Peltonen L, Aula P. Attitudes towards genetic testing: analysis of contradictions. Social Science & Medicine 1998; 46: 1367–1374
- Palsson G, Rabinow P. The Icelandic genome debate. Trends in Biotechnology 2001; 19: 166–171
- Lapham E V, Kozma C, Weiss J O. Genetic discrimination: perspectives of consumers. Science 1996; 274: 621–624
- Roth M T, Painter R B. Genetic discrimination in health insurance: an overview and analysis of the issues. Nursing Clinics of North America 2000; 35: 731–756
- Gostin L O, Hodge J G. Genetic privacy and the law: an end to genetics exceptionalism. Jurimetrics Fall, 1999; 21–58