References
- Galasiński D, Ziółkowska J. Gender and the gynecological exam: Women's identities in doctors' narratives. Qual Health Res 2007; 17: 477–488
- Wijma B, Siwe K. Examiner's unique possibilities to catalyze women's empowerment during a pelvic examination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 1102–1103
- Hou P H. The experience of women's first pelvic examination, [Thesis], Taipei (Taiwan): National Taiwan University; 2003. 125 p. Available from: National Central Library of Taiwan, Electronic Theses and Dissertation System; 091NTU01563013
- Wright D, Fenwick J, Stephenson P, Monterosso L. Speculum ‘self-insertion’: A pilot study. J Clin Nurs 2005; 14: 1098–1111
- Larsen M, Oldeide C C, Malterud K. Not so bad after all … Women's experiences of pelvic examinations. Fam Pract 1997; 14: 148–152
- Oscarsson M, Benzein E. Women's experiences of pelvic examination: An interview study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 23: 17–25
- Emerson J P. Behavior in private places: Sustaining definitions of reality in gynecological examinations. Recent Sociol [serial online] 1971; 2: 74–97, Available from: www.chass.utoronto. ca/∼salaff/Emerson74-97.pdf via the Internet [Accessed 23 February 2008]
- Harré M. Physical being: A theory for a corporeal psychology. Blackwell, OxfordUK 1991
- Henslin J M, Biggs M. The sociology of the vaginal examination. Down to Earth Sociology4th edn., J M Henslin. The Free Press, New York 1985; 128–130
- Fiddes P, Scott A, Fletcher J, Glasier A. Attitudes towards pelvic examination and chaperones: A questionnaire survey of women and providers. Contraception 2003; 67: 313–317
- Cheng L F. The bodies and gynaecological encounters in Taiwan. International Conference held at the International Sociological Association: XVth ISA World Congress of Sociology, BrisbaneAustralia, July, 7–132002
- Spradley J P. The Ethnographic Interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1979
- Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2004
- Appleton J V. Analysing qualitative interview data: Addressing issues of validity and reliability. J Adv Nurs 1995; 22: 993–997
- Twinn S. An exploratory study examining the influence of translation on the validity and reliability of qualitative data in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 1997; 26: 418–423
- Guiffre P A, Williams C. Not just bodies: Strategies for desexualizing the physical examination of patients. Gend Soc 2000; 14: 457–482
- Taiwan Medical Association [Internet]. Practice years and gender statistic [cited 20 February 2008], Available from: http://www.tma.tw/stats/stats6.asp
- Ono N. Gender ideology in the rise of obstetrics. Jpn J Am Stud 2006; 17: 71–89
- Martin S C, Arnold R M, Parker R M. Gender and medical socialization. J Health Soc Behav 1988; 29: 333–343
- Nåden D, Eriksson K. The phenomenon of confirmation: An aspect of nursing as an art. Int J Hum Caring 2000; 4: 23–28
- Wendt E, Fridlund B, Lidell E. Trust and confirmation in a gynecologic examination situation: A critical incident technique analysis. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 2004; 83: 1208–1215
- Drew N. Exclusion and confirmation: A phenomenology of women’ experiences with caregivers. Image J Nurs Sch 1986; 18: 39–43
- Ludwig H. Thoughts on the patient–doctor relationship in obstetrics and gynecology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repord Biol 1999; 85: 85–91
- Severinsson E I. Confirmation, meaning and self-awareness as core concepts of the nursing supervision model. Nurs Ethics 2001; 8: 36–44
- Reddy D M, Wasserman S A. Patient anxiety during gynecologic examinations. Behavioral indicators. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 631–636