Altruism or obligation? The motivations and experience of women who donate oocytes to known recipients in assisted conception treatment: an interpretative phenomenological analysis study

References

• CDC: 2013 ART Fertility Success Rates [Internet]. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/art/reports/index.html [last accessed 25 Dec 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Jordan CB, Belar CD, Stan Williams R. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors' experiences. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2004;25:145–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings G. Commentary on Craft and Thornhill: new ethical strategies to recruit gamete donors. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;10:307–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority: (Disclosure of Donor Information) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/5526.html [last accessed 5 Jun 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority: (Disclosure of Donor Information) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Egg_and_sperm_donation_in_the_UK_2012-2013.pdf [last accessed 25 Apr 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Lessor R. All in the family: social processes in ovarian egg donation between sisters. Sociol Health Illn 1993;15:393–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer MV, Kavic SM. Oocyte and embryo donation 2006: reviewing two decades of innovation and controversy. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12:153–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raoul-Duval A, Letur-Konirsch H, Frydman R. Anonymous oocyte donation: a psychological study of recipients, donors and children. Hum Reprod 1992;7:51–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil E, Cornet D, Sibony C, et al. Psychological aspects in anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1344–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khamsi F, Endman MW, Lacanna IC, et al. Some psychological aspects of oocyte donation from known donors on altruistic basis. Fertil Steril 1997;68:323–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatens P, Devroey P, Camus M, et al I. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes. Hum Reprod 2000;15:476–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding D, Handley S, Dugueno L, et al. Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment. J Commun Appl Soc Psychol 1998;8:273–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power M, Baber R, Abdalla H, et al. A comparison of the attitudes of volunteer donors and infertile patient donors on an ovum donation programme. Hum Reprod 1990;5:352–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström-Antilla V. Follow-up study of Finnish volunteer oocyte donors concerning their attitudes to oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1995;10:3073–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd LM, Sidebotham M, Lieberman B. Egg donation – the donor's view: an aid to future recruitment. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2002;5:175–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ulrich M, Weatherall A. Motherhood and infertility: viewing motherhood through the lens of infertility. Feminism Psychol 2000;10:323–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershberger P, Klock SC, Barnes RB. Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: a phenomenological study. Fertil Steril 2007; 87:288–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Jarman M, Osborn M, Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Murray M, Chamberlain K, eds. Qualitative health psychology: theories and methods. London: Sage; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Osborn M, Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith JA, ed. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to methods, 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2008:53–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kalfoglou AL, Gittelsohn J. A qualitative follow-up study of women's experiences with oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 2000;15:798–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren N, Blood J. Who donates? Why donate? An exploration of the characteristics and motivations of known egg donors: the Victoria, Australia experience. J Fertil Counsel 2003;10:20–4.
   Google Scholar
• Winter A, Daniluk JC. A gift from the heart: the experiences of women whose egg donation helped their sisters become mothers. J Couns Dev 2004;82:483–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee S, Hitkari JA, Greenblatt EM. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2040–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman M. Egg and embryo donation and the meaning of motherhood. Women Health 2003;38:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland R, Living laboratories: women and reproductive technology. London: Cedar; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Morell CM, Unwomanly conduct: the challenges of intentional childlessness. London: Routledge; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Currie D. Rethinking what to do and how we do it: a study of reproductive decisions. Can Rev Sociol Anthropol 1988;25:231–53.
   Google Scholar
• Jadva V, Murray C, Lycett E, et al. Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate mothers. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2196–204. 29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw R. The gift-exchange and reciprocity of women in donor-assisted conception. Sociol Rev 2007;55: 293–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diprose R, Corporeal generosity: on giving with Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty, and Levinas. United States of America: State University of New York Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Purewal S, Van den Akker OB. British women's attitudes towards oocyte donation: ethnic differences and altruism. Patient Educ Couns 2006;64:43–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith L, Blyth E, Farrand A. UK gamete donors’ reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitment. Hum Reprod 2007;2:1675–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders DM, Garner F. Oocyte donation using ‘known’ donors: it may seem the convenient answer but who pays? Hum Reprod 1996;11:2356–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft I, Flyckt S, Heeley G, et al. Will removal of anonymity influence the recruitment of egg donors? A survey of past donors and recipients. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10:325–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart-Smith SJ, Smith JA, Scott EJ. Treatment decision making in anonymous donor egg in-vitro fertilisation: a qualitative study of childless women and women with genetically related children. Human Fertil 2011;14:97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefferon K, Gil-Rodriguez E. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychologist 2011;24:756–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain FA. Reproductive issues from the Islamic perspective. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2000;3:124–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Financial compensation of oocyte donors. Fertil Steril 2007;88:305–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority: (Payment for donors) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/7091.html [last accessed 25 May 2016].
   Google Scholar