The psychometric properties of the Iranian version of revised prenatal coping inventory (Nu PCI) in healthy pregnant women: a confirmatory factor analysis

References

• Wu W-R, Hung C-H. First-time mothers psychiatric health status during the transition to motherhood. Community Ment Health J 2016;52:937–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salari P, Firoozi M, Sahebi A. Study of the stressors associated with pregnancy. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci 2005;12:34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Nikrahan G, Ganjeh SJ, Zarean E, Naghshineh E. Examining the relationship between big five personality factors, coping styles and depression in pregnant women. Elixir Psychol 2012;42:6457–62.
   Google Scholar
• Chou FH, Avant KC, Kuo SH, Fetzer SJ. Relationships between nausea and vomiting, perceived stress, social support, pregnancy planning, and psychosocial adaptation in a sample of mothers: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud 2008;45:1185–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Ryding EL. Antenatal fear of childbirth and its association with subsequent caesarean section and experience of childbirth. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;113:638–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shishehgar S, Mahmoodi A, Dolatian M, et al. The relationship of social support and quality of life with the level of stress in pregnant women using the PATH model. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2013;15:560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Costa D, Larouche J, Dritsa M, Brender W. Psychosocial correlates of prepartum and postpartum depressed mood. J Affect Disord 2000;59:31–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhshayesh AR, Kazeraninejad M, Mongabadi MD, Raghebian M. A comparison of general health and coping strategies in fertile and infertile women in Yazd. Iran J Reprod Med 2012;10:601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor SE, Stanton AL. Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2007;3:377–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zautra AJ, Hall JS, Murray KE. Resilience: a new integrative approach to health and mental health research. Health Psychol Rev 2008;2:41–64.
   Google Scholar
• Dunkel Schetter C. Psychological science on pregnancy: stress processes, biopsychosocial models, and emerging research issues. Annu Rev Psychol 2011;62:531–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guardino CM, Dunkel Schetter C. Coping during pregnancy: a systematic review and recommendations. Health Psychol Rev 2014;8:70–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez WD, Konrath SH, Seng JS. Abuse-related post-traumatic stress, coping, and tobacco use in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2011;40:422–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borcherding KE. Coping in healthy primigravidae pregnant women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2009;38:453–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yali AM, Lobel M. Coping and distress in pregnancy: an investigation of medically high risk women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1999;20:39–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton JG, Lobel M. Types, patterns, and predictors of coping with stress during pregnancy: examination of the Revised Prenatal Coping Inventory in a diverse sample. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 2008;29:97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011:202–221.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986;35:382–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling: Multidisciplinary J 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:1–73.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:539–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing research. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1991;161–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 1975;28:563–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson DL, Gillaspy JA Jr, Purc-Stephenson R. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychol Methods 2009;14:6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmaz S, Goksuluk D, Zararsiz G. MVN: an R package for assessing multivariate normality. R J 2014;6:151–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods 2008;6:53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giurgescu C, Penckofer S, Maurer MC, Bryant FB. Impact of uncertainty, social support, and prenatal coping on the psychological well-being of high-risk pregnant women. Nurs Res 2006;55:356–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yali AM, Lobel M. Stress-resistance resources and coping in pregnancy. Anxiety Stress Coping 2002;15:289–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobel M, Yali AM, Zhu W, et al. Beneficial associations between optimistic disposition and emotional distress in high-risk pregnancy. Psychol Health 2002;17:77–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar