Being a donor-child: wishes for parental support, peer support and counseling

References

• Brewaeys A, de Bruyn JK, Louwe LA, et al. Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients’ choices. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:820–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheib JE, Riordan M, Rubin S. Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12-17 year olds. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:239–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels K. Donor gametes: anonymous or identified?. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gyn. 2007;21:113–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Readings J, Blake L, Casey P, et al. Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22:485–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens PMW, Simons AHM, van Kooij RJ, et al. A new Dutch Law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: background, content and impact. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:852–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law; III. Gamete and embryo donation. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1407–1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:45–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertility and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Code of Practice Edition 8.0. London: HFEA; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jadva V, Freeman T, Kramer W, et al. The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1909–1919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner AJ, Coyle A. What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experience of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2041–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlstedt PP, LaBounty K, Kennedy WT. The views of adult offspring of sperm donation: essential feedback for the development of ethical guidelines within the practice of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2236–2246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman T, Golombok S. Donor insemination: a follow-up study of disclosure decisions, family relationships and child adjustment at adolescence. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25:193–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallandini MA, Zanchettin L, Gronchi G, et al. Parental disclosure of assisted reproductive technology (ART) conception to their children: a systematic and meta analytic review. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1275–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul MS, Berger R. Topic avoidance and family functioning in families conceived with donor insemination. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2566–2571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw M, Gunter C, Tidy C, et al. Working with previously anonymous gamete donors and donor-conceived adults: recent practice experiences of running the DNA based voluntary information exchange and contact register, UK DonorLink. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013;16:26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boogaars J, Hardeveld van E, Woertman F. Counselling een nieuw perspectief van ont-moeten, ont-dekken, ont-wikkelen [Counseling a new perspective on all-ways, dis-cover, development]. Garant: Antwerpen; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Veen van G. Handboek counseling [Counseling handbook]. Van Gorcum: Assen; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Allan S. Donor conception and the search for information: from secrecy and anonymity to openness. Abingdon: Routledge; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ilioi E, Blake L, Jadva V, et al. The role of age of disclosure of biological origins in the psychological wellbeing of adolescents conceived by reproductive donation: a longitudinal study from age 1 to age 14. J Child Psychol Psychiatr. 2017;58:315–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeije HA. A purposeful approach of the constant comparative method in analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002;30:391–409.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi A. Concerning the application of phenomenology to caring research. Scand J Caring Sci. 2000;14:11–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAXQDA. Software for qualitative data analysis. Berlin: VERBI Software – Consult Sozialforschung GmbH; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 2001;24:230–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson DR, Jennings PK, Kramer W. Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2415–2424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akker vd O. A review of family donor constructs: current research and future directions. Hum Reprod. 2006;12:91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz R, Nelson MK, Kramer W. Donor conceived offspring conceive of the donor: the relevance of age, awareness, and family form. Soc Sci Med. 2013;86:52–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalos A, Gottlieb C, Lalos O. Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: a study of parental thinking. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1759–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström-Anttila V, Sälevaara M, Suikkari AM. Increasing openness in oocyte donation families regarding disclosure over 15 years. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2535–2542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser M, Gerrits T, Kop F, et al. Exploring parents’ feelings about counselling in donor sperm treatment. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;37:156–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves K, Daniels K. Parents dilemmas in sharing donor insemination conception stories with their children. Child Soc. 2007;21:420–431.
   Google Scholar
• Pennings G. Disclosure of donor conception, age of disclosure and the well-being of donor offspring. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:969–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok S, Blake L, Casey P, et al. Children born through reproductive donation: a longitudinal study of psychological adjustment. J Child Psychol Psych. 2013;54:653–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indekeu A, Rober P, Schotsmans P, et al. How couples’ experience prior to the start of infertility treatment with donor gametes influences the disclosure decision. Gynaecol Obstet Invest. 2013;76:125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyverkens E, Provoost V, Ravelingien A, et al. Beyond sperm cells: a qualitative study on constructed meanings of the sperm donor in lesbian families. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1248–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar