References
- Franklin S. Conception through a looking glass: the paradox of IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27:747–755.
- Hertz R, Mattes J. Donor-shared siblings or genetic strangers: new families, clans, and the internet. J Fam Issues. 2011;32:1129–1155.
- Jones C. Looking like a family: negotiating bio-genetic continuity in British lesbian families using licensed donor insemination. Sexualities. 2005;8:221–237.
- Nordqvist P. ‘I don’t want us to stand out more than we already do’: lesbian couples negotiating family connections in donor conception. Sexualities. 2012;15:644–661.
- Nordqvist P. Bringing kinship into being: connectedness, donor conception and lesbian parenthood. Sociology. 2014;48:268–283.
- 6 juli 2007 – Wet betreffende de medisch begeleide voortplanting en de bestemming van de overtallige embryo’s en de gameten [6 July 2007 – Law regarding assisted reproductive technologies and the destination of supernumerary embryos and gametes] (Belgium). Available from: http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/wet/wet.htm
- 5 mei 2014 - Wet houdende de vaststelling van de afstamming van de meemoeder [5 May 2014 - Law regarding the determination of filiation of the non-biological mother] (Belgium). Available from: http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/wet/wet.htm
- Smith J, Osborn M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. London: Sage. pp. 53–80
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
- Hill C, Thompson B, Williams E. A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. Couns Psychol. 1997;25:517–572.
- Pennings G. The donor's right to retire. Second pregnancies and the donor's right to retire. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2569–2572.