Infertility-related stress and sexual satisfaction: a dyadic approach

References

• Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1520–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta J, Palmer MJ, Tanton C, et al. Prevalence of infertility and help seeking among 15 000 women and men. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(9):2108–2118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhaz-Jorge C, Geyter C, De Kupka MS, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012 : results generated from European registers by ESHRE†. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(8):1638–1652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe J. Reproductive trauma: psychotherapy for pregnancy loss and infertility clients from a reproductive story perspective. Psychotherapy. 2017;54(4):380–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundby J, Olsen A, Schei B. Quality of care for infertility patients. An evaluation of a plan for a hospital investigation. Scand J Soc Med. 1994;22(2):139–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg BJ, Wilson JF. Psychiatric morbidity in the infertile population: a reconceptualization. Fertil. Steril. 1990;53(4):654–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applegarth LD. Psychological issues of infertility and assisted reproductive technology. In: Lipshultz LI, Howards SS, Niederberger CS, editors. Infertility in the Male. 4th ed. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 516–527.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson BD, Newton CR, Feingold T. Anxiety and sexual stress in men and women undergoing infertility treatment. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(4):911–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurlo MC, Franscesca M, Della C, et al. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Fertility Problem Inventory – Short Form. Health Psychol Open. 2017;4(2):205510291773865. 2055102917738657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galhardo A, Cunha M, Pinto-Gouveia J, et al. The mediator role of emotion regulation processes on infertility-related stress. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2013;20(4):497–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher J. Infertility and assisted reproduction. In: World Health Organization, editor. Mental health aspects of women’s reproductive health: a global review of the literature. Geneva: Word Health Organization; 2009. p. 128–146.
   Google Scholar
• Drosdzol A, Skrzypulec V. Evaluation of marital and sexual interactions of polish infertile couples. J Sex Med. 2009;6(12):3335–3346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton CR, Sherrard W, Glavac I. The Fertility Problem Inventory: measuring perceived infertility-related stress. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(1):54–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In: Revenson TA, Kayser K, Bodenmann G, editors. Couples coping with stress. Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2005. p. 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G, Ledermann T, Blattner D, et al. Associations among everyday stress, critical life events, and sexual problems. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006;194(7):494–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G, Atkins DC, Schär M, et al. The association between daily stress and sexual activity. J Fam Psychol. 2010;24(3):271–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Measuring sexual health: conceptual and practical considerations and related indicators. Geneva (Switzerland): Word Health Organization; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Davison SL, Bell RJ, LaChina M, et al. The relationship between self-reported sexual satisfaction and general well-being in women. J Sex Med. 2009;6(10):2690–2697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornberger LL, Rosenthal SL, Biro FM, Stanberry LR. Sexual histories of adolescent girls: Comparison between interview and chart. J Adolesc Health. 1995;16(3):235–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabr AA, Omran EF, Abdallah AA, et al. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in infertile versus fertile couples. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:38–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare Z, Golmakani N, Amirian M. Comparison of sexual problems in fertile and infertile couples. J Caring Sci. 2017;6(3):269–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Onat G, Beji NK. Marital relationship and quality of life among couples with infertility. Sex Disabil. 2012;30(1):39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao P, Coates R, Maycock B. Investigating marital relationship in infertility: a systematic review of quantitative studies. J Reprod Infertil. 2012;13(2):71–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang K, Li J, Zhang JX, et al. Psychological characteristics and marital quality of infertile women registered for in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection in China. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(4):792–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan S, Tahir A. Psychological consequences of infertility. Hellenic J Psychol. 2011;8:229–247.
   Google Scholar
• Masoumi SZ, Garousian M, Khani S, et al. Comparison of quality of life, sexual satisfaction and marital satisfaction between fertile and infertile couples. Int J Fertil Steril. 2016;10(3):290–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying L, Har L, Yuen A. Gender differences in experiences with and adjustments to infertility : a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(10):1640–1652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wischmann T, Schilling K, Toth B, et al. Sexuality, self-esteem and partnership quality in infertile women and men. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014;74(08):759–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güleç G, Hassa H, Günes E, et al. The effects of infertility on sexual functions and dyadic adjustment in couples that present for infertility treatment. Turkish J Psychiatry. 2011;22(3):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gana K, Jakubowska S. Relationship between infertility-related stress and emotional distress and marital satisfaction. J Health Psychol. 2016;21(6):1043–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luk B-K, Loke AY. The impact of infertility on the psychological well-being, marital relationships, sexual relationships, and quality of life of couples: a systematic review. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015;41(6):610–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee T-Y, Sun G-H, Chao S-C. The effect of an infertility diagnosis on the distress, marital and sexual satisfaction between husbands and wives in Taiwan. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(8):1762–1767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoji M, Hamatani T, Ishikawa S, et al. Sexual satisfaction of infertile couples assessed using the Golombok-Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS). Sci Rep. 2015;4(1):5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascoal PM, Narciso I de SB, Pereira NM. What is sexual satisfaction? Thematic analysis of lay people’s definitions. J Sex Res. 2014;51(1):22–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg BJ. A researcher’s guide to investigating the psychological sequelae of infertility: Methodological considerations. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 1994;15(3):147–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny DA, Cook W. Partner effects in relationship research: conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Pers Relationships. 1999;6(4):433–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peugh JL, DiLillo D, Panuzio J. Analyzing mixed-dyadic data using structural equation models. Struct Equation Model. 2013;20(2):314–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Štulhofer A, Buško V. Evaluacija novog instrumenta za procjenu seksualnog zadovoljstva [An evaluation of a new instrument for the assessment of sexual satisfaction]. Suvremena Psihologija. 2008;11(2):287–312.
   Google Scholar
• Štulhofer A, Buško V, Brouillard P. Development and bicultural validation of the new sexual satisfaction scale. J Sex Res. 2010;47(4):257–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donarelli Z, Gullo S, Lo Coco G, et al. Assessing infertility-related stress: the factor structure of the Fertility Problem Inventory in Italian couples undergoing infertility treatment. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2015;36(2):58–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moura-Ramos M, Gameiro S, Canavarro MC, et al. Assessing infertility stress: re-examining the factor structure of the Fertility Problem Inventory. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(2):496–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohl J, Reder F, Fernandez A, et al. Impact de l’infertilité et de l’Assistance médicale à la procréation sur la sexualité. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2009;37(1):25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. London (UK): Guilford Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Butzer B, Campbell L. Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: a study of married couples. Pers Relationships. 2008;15(1):141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen JL, Hyde JS. A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychol Bull. 2010;136(1):21–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Fuentes M del M, Santos-Iglesias P, Sierra JC. A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2014;14(1):67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson BD, Newton CR, Rosen KH. Examining congruence between partners’ perceived infertility-related stress and its relationship to marital adjustment and depression in infertile couples BRENNAN. Family Process. 2003;42(1):59–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurević J. Patterns of accordance between partners in evaluation of marital functioning and perception of general marital quality (unpublished master thesis). Zadar (Croatia): University of Zadar; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, et al. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1506–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eugster A, Vingerhoets A. Psychological aspects of in vitro fertilization: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(5):575–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconier MK, Jackson JB, Hilpert P, et al. Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;42:28–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molgora S, Fenaroli V, Acquati C, et al. Examining the role of dyadic coping on the marital adjustment of couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Front Psychol. 2019;10:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar