Experiences of young girls and women undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation: a systematic review and thematic synthesis

References

• Gellert SE, Pors SE, Kristensen SG, et al. Transplantation of frozen-thawed ovarian tissue: an update on worldwide activity published in peer-reviewed papers and on the danish cohort. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(4):561–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheshpari S, Shahnazi M, Mobarak H, et al. Ovarian function and reproductive outcome after ovarian tissue transplantation: a systematic review. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans MM, Donnez J. Fertility preservation in women for medical and social reasons: Oocytes vs ovarian tissue. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;70:63–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson RA, Amant F, Braat D, et al. ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(4):hoaa052.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Fertility preservation in women. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(17):1657–1665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasmin E, Balachandren N, Davies MC, et al. Fertility preservation for medical reasons in girls and women: British fertility society policy and practice guideline. Hum Fertil. 2018;21(1):3–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(6):1022–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yding Andersen C, Mamsen LS, Kristensen SG. Fertility preservation: freezing of ovarian tissue and clinical opportunities. Reproduction. 2019;158(5):F27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen SG, Andersen CY. Cryopreservation of Ovarian tissue: opportunities beyond fertility preservation and a positive view into the future. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almodin CG, Almodin PM, Radaelli MRM, et al. The frst ovarian tissue transplant between monozygotic twin sisters discordant for ovarian function in Latin America. J Bras Reprod Assist. 2015;19(1):29–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donnez PJ, Dolmans MM, Demylle D, et al. Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet. 2004;364(9443):1405–1410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak H, Malhas R, Craciunas L, et al. Fresh and cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation for preserving reproductive and endocrine function: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. 2022. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Schover L. Psychosocial aspects of infertility and decisions about reproduction in young cancer survivors: a review. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1999;33(1):53–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolmans MM, von Wolff M, Poirot C, et al. Transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in a series of 285 women: a review of five leading European centers. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(5):1102–1115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotz L, Barbosa PR, Knorr C, et al. The safety and satisfaction of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in prepubertal and adolescent girls. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40(4):547–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan-Pyke CS, Carlson CA, Prewitt M, et al. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) in prepubertal girls and young women: an analysis of parents’ and patients’ decision-making. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(4):593–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman EJ, Anders CK, Behera MA. A nationwide survey of oncologists regarding treatment-related infertility and fertility preservation in female cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(5):1652–1656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesali S, Navid B, Mohammadi M, et al. Little information about fertility preservation is provided for cancer patients: a survey of oncologists’ knowledge, attitude and current practice. Eur J Cancer Care. 2019;28(1):e12947–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, King L, et al. Impact of physicians' personal discomfort and patient prognosis on discussion of fertility preservation with young cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77(3):338–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapira M, Dolmans M-M, Silber S, et al. Evaluation of ovarian tissue transplantation: results from three clinical centers. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):388–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. JCO. 2004;22(20):4174–4183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin S, Kim J, Kim D, et al. The importance of education regarding the effects of anticancer treatment on fertility and ovarian function in the female patients with breast cancer. J Menopausal Med. 2019;25(3):142–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watkins DC. Qualitative research: the importance of conducting research that doesn't “count”. Health Promot Pract. 2012;13(2):153–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, et al. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern C, Jordan Z, Mcarthur A. Developing the review question and inclusion criteria: the first steps in conducting a systematic review. Am J Nurs. 2014;114(4):53–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. 2018. CASP (Qualitative) Checklist. [online]; [cited 2021 Nov 30]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hershberger PE, Finnegan L, Pierce PF, et al. The decision-making process of young adult women with cancer who considered fertility cryopreservation. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013;42(1):59–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchel C, Whiting-Collings L, Christianson M. Understanding patients' knowledge and feelings regarding their cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a qualitative interviewing study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2020;9(4):502–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach AS, Macklon KT, Kristensen SG. Futures and fears in the freezer: Danish women’s experiences with ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(3):555–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(1):45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens J, Delbaere I, Lancker A, et al. Cancer patients’ and professional caregivers’ needs, preferences and factors associated with receiving and providing fertility-related information: a mixed-methods systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(2):300–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen S, Zelkowitz P, Rosberger Z. Cancer and fertility: optimizing communication between patients and healthcare providers. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2019;13(1):53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrbar V, Urech C, Alder J, et al. Decision-making about fertility preservation-qualitative data on young cancer patients’ attitudes and needs. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19(4):695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anazodo A, Laws P, Logan S, et al. How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(2):159–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor JF, Ott MA. Fertility preservation after a cancer diagnosis: a systematic review of adolescents', parents', and providers' perspectives, experiences, and preferences. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29(6):585–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn GP, Murphy D, Knapp C, et al. Who decides? Decision making and fertility preservation in teens with cancer: a review of the literature. J Adolesc Health. 2011;49(4):337–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peate M, Meiser B, Friedlander M, et al. It’s now or never: fertility-related knowledge, decision-making preferences, and treatment intentions in young women with breast cancer–an australian fertility decision aid collaborative group study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(13):1670–1677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armuand GM, Wettergren L, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, et al. Desire for children, difficulties achieving a pregnancy, and infertility distress 3 to 7 years after cancer diagnosis. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(10):2805–2812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan S, Perz J, Ussher JM, et al. Systematic review of fertility-related psychological distress in cancer patients: Informing on an improved model of care. Psychooncology. 2019;28(1):22–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan S, Anazodo A. The psychological importance of fertility preservation counseling and support for cancer patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(5):583–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rosa VL, Shah M, Kahramanoglu I, et al. Quality of life and fertility preservation counseling for women with gynecological cancer: an integrated psychological and clinical perspective. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;41(2):86–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennyson R, Paper B. An interpretative phenomenological analysis study into the experience of teenagers and young adults offered ovarian tissue cryopreservation following a cancer diagnosis. Doctoral thesis. University of Oxford; 2017.
   Google Scholar