What are antenatal maternity care needs of women who conceived through fertility treatment?: a mixed methods systematic review

References

• World Health Organization (WHO). [Internet]p; 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 1]. Available from: WHO | Multiple definitions of infertility.
   Google Scholar
• Younger M, Hollins-Martin C, Choucri L. Individualised care for women with assisted conception pregnancies and midwifery practice implications: an analysis of the existing research and current practice. Midwifery. 2015;31(2):265–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). ART factsheet. Press information; 2020 [cited 2021 May 25] [Internet]. Available from: https://www.eshre.eu/Press-Room/Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Akhondi MM, Kamali K, Ranjbar F, et al. Prevalence of primary infertility in Iran in 2010. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(12):1398–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Fertility treatment 2014–2016–trends and figures; 2018 [cited 2019 Jul 1]. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/2563/hfea-fertility-trends-and-figures-2017-v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Perined. Perinatal care in the Netherlands 2003. Perined; 2006 [cited 2019 Jul 1] [Internet]. Available from: https://assets.perined.nl/docs/e534df3a-a2ff-4148-a313-664d7354ea7f.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Perined. Perinatal care in the Netherlands 2017. Perined; 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 1] [Internet]. Available from: http://www.perinatreg-data.nl/JB2017/Jaarboek2017.html#tabel1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Maehara K, Iwata H, Kosaka M, et al. Experiences of transition to motherhood among pregnant women following assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review protocol of qualitative evidence. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(1):74–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka MS, European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM), European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from european registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(10):1957–1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein J. Parenting after infertility. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 1990;4(2):11–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Courbiere B, Lacan A, Grynberg M, et al. Psychosocial and professional burden of medically assisted reproduction (MAR): results from a French survey. PLOS One. 2020;15(9):e0238945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eugster A, Vingerhoets AJ. Psychological aspects of in vitro fertilization: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(5):575–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Balen F, Naaktgeboren N, Trimbos-Kemper TC. In-vitro fertilization: the experience of treatment, pregnancy and delivery. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(1):95–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti F, Agostini F, Fagandini P, et al. Depressive symptoms during late pregnancy and early parenthood following assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(3):851–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarberg K, Fisher JR, Wynter KH. Psychological and social aspects of pregnancy, childbirth and early parenting after assisted conception: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(5):395–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson C, Leese B. Do nurses and midwives have a role in promoting the well-being of patients during their fertility journey? A review of the literature. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013;16(1):2–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan H. Experiences of infertility: liminality and the role of the fertility clinic. Nurs Inq. 2007;14(2):132–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihelic M, Morawska A, Filus A. Preparing parents for parenthood: protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a preventative parenting intervention for expectant parents. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bergh B, van den Heuvel MI, Lahti M, et al. Prenatal developmental origins of behavior and mental health: the influence of maternal stress in pregnancy. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;117:26–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Allan HT, van den Akker O, Culley L, et al. An integrative literature review of psychosocial factors in the transition to parenthood following non-donor-assisted reproduction compared with spontaneously conceiving couples. Hum Fertil. 2021;24(4):249–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Routine psychosocial care in infertility and medically assisted reproduction – a guide for fertility staff; 2015 [cited 2021 Jun 25]. [Internet]. Available from: ESHRE psychology guideline_2015_final_version 1_2 (1).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gameiro S, Boivin J, Dancet E, et al. ESHRE guideline: routine psychosocial care in infertility and medically assisted reproduction-a guide for fertility staff. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(11):2476–2485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarberg K, Kirkman M, de Lacey S. Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(3):498–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden A. Mixed-Methods systematic reviews: integrating quantitative and qualitative findings. National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research (NCDDR). Focus. 2010;25:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, PRISMA Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Good clinical treatment in assisted reproduction – an ESHRE position paper; 2008 [cited 2021 Jun 25] [Internet]. Available from: GCT in ART.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version; 2018 [cited 2019 Jul 1] [Internet]. Available from: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127425851/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-04-04.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe M, Sheppard L. A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: alternative tool structure is proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):79–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, et al. Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:49–59.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(1):47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang MZ, Sun YC, Gau ML, et al. First-time mothers’ experiences of pregnancy and birth following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Taiwan. J Health Popul Nutr. 2019;38(1):10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjbar F, Akhondi MM, Borimnejad L, et al. Paradox of modern pregnancy: a phenomenological study of women’s lived experiences from assisted pregnancy. J Pregnancy. 2015;2015:543210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pascalis L, Agostini F, Monti F, et al. A comparison of quality of life following spontaneous conception and assisted reproduction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118(3):216–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmstedt A, Widström AM, Collins A. Psychological correlates of prenatal attachment in women who conceived after in vitro fertilization and women who conceived naturally. Birth. 2006;33(4):303–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CJ, Chen YC, Sung HC, et al. Perinatal attachment in naturally pregnant and infertility-treated pregnant women in Taiwan. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(10):2200–2208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo E, Bestard J. Psychosocial needs of women and their partners after successful assisted reproduction treatment in barcelona. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016;3:90–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• French LR, Sharp DJ, Turner KM. Antenatal needs of couples following fertility treatment: a qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(638):e570–e577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehto S, Sevón E, Rönkä A, et al. Narrative study of the significance of infertility and its treatment for maternal identity. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019;48(4):445–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin BM, Gursoy E. The social and psychological consequences of women getting pregnant with fertility treatment: a qualitative study. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021;57(2):463–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmelink JC, Adema W, Pranger A, et al. Client perspectives of midwifery care in the transition from subfertility to parenthood: a qualitative study in The Netherlands. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;37(1):12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang MZ, Kao CH, Lin KC, et al. Psychological health of women who have conceived using assisted reproductive technology in Taiwan: findings from a longitudinal study. BMC Women’s Health. 2019;19(1):97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Cross WM, Plummer V, et al. The risk factors of antenatal depression: a cross-sectional survey. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(19–20):3599–3609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmstedt A, Widström AM, Wramsby H, et al. Personality factors and emotional responses to pregnancy among IVF couples in early pregnancy: a comparative study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(2):152–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourounti K, Anagnostopoulos F, Lykeridou K. Coping strategies as psychological risk factor for antenatal anxiety, worries, and depression among Greek women. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2013;16(5):353–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornelles LM, Maccallum Professor F, Lopes Professor R, et al. Living each week as unique’: maternal fears in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies. Midwifery. 2014;30(3):e115–e120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong L, Shao Y, Xia J, et al. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of psychological experience and adjustment of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:8069–8077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjbar F, Warmelink JC, Gharacheh M. Prenatal attachment in pregnancy following assisted reproductive technology: a literature review. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020;38(1):86–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Globevnik Velikonja V, Lozej T, Leban G, et al. The quality of life in pregnant women conceiving through in vitro fertilization. Zdr Varst. 2016;55(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smorti M, Smorti A. Medical successes and couples’ psychological problems in assisted reproduction treatment: a narrative based medicine approach. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(2):169–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects–a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(2):328–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Knowledge Synthesis Group, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146(2):138–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furmli H, Seeto RA, Hewko SL, et al. Maternal mental health in assisted and natural conception: a prospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(11):1608–1615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan H, Finnerty G. The practice gap in the care of women following successful infertility treatments: unasked research questions in midwifery and nursing. Hum Fertil. 2007;10(2):99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Darwiche J, Maillard F, Germond M, et al. The transition of care from fertility specialists to obstetricians: maternal adjustment and postpartum depressive symptoms. Womens Health. 2013;9(1):109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan J. The assisted conception pregnancy. Pract Midwife. 2004;7(8):18–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SH, Kuo BJ. Chinese traditional childbearing attitudes and infertile couples in Taiwan. J Nurs Scholarship. 2000;32(1):54–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson EL, Trotter KJ, Bergh C, et al. Pregnancy-Related anxiety in women who conceive via in vitro fertilization: a mixed methods approach. J Perinat Educ. 2016;25(3):193–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes M, Roiko A, Reed R, et al. Outcomes for women and infants following assisted conception: implications for perinatal education, care, and support. J Perinat Educ. 2012;21(1):18–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakiyama T. Development and evaluation of the adaptation support program in early pregnancy after the use of assisted reproductive technology. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2019;16(3):286–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolles MW, de Vries M, Hollander MH, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and satisfaction of women with a birth plan in The Netherlands. Birth. 2019;46(4):686–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gameiro S, Moura-Ramos M, Canavarro MC, et al. Psychosocial adjustment during the transition to parenthood of portuguese couples who conceived spontaneously or through assisted reproductive technologies. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(3):207–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar