Effect of delivery mode on Chinese women’s maternal satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of support from medical staff and women’s self-assessment of health

References

• Lan MM, Zhu X, Yang M, et al. Correaltion between maternal childbirth experience and postnatal depression. Department of obstetrics and gynecology. J Nurs Sci. 2021;36(13):23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens NR, Wallston KA, Hamilton NA. Perceived control and maternal satisfaction with childbirth: a measure development study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;33(1):15–24. doi:10.3109/0167482X.2011.652996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanbari-Homaie S, Meedya S, Mohammad A, et al. Recommendations for improving primiparous women’s childbirth experience: results from a multiphase study in Iran. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):146. doi:10.1186/s12978-021-01196-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrotte V, Chaudhary A, Goodman A. At least your baby is healthy obstetric violence or disrespect and abuse in childbirth occurrence worldwide: a literature review. OJOG. 2020;10(11):1544–1562. doi:10.4236/ojog.2020.10110139
   Google Scholar
• Lederman RP, Weis KL, Lederman RP, et al. Prenatal fears of loss of self-esteem and well-being in labor. Psychosocial adaptation to pregnancy: seven Dimensions of maternal development. 2020;1:229–243. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-45738-9_8.
   Google Scholar
• Tschudin S, Alder J, Hendriksen S, et al. Previous birth experience and birth anxiety: predictors of caesarean section on demand. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;30(3):175–180. doi:10.1080/01674820902789233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fenaroli V, Molgora S, Dodaro S, et al. The childbirth experience: obstetric and psychological predictors in Italian primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):419. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2561-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildingsson I, Christine R. Childbirth experiences among women with fear of birth randomized to internet-based cognitive therapy or midwife counseling. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;41(3):205–214. doi:10.1080/0167482X.2019.1634047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS, et al. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(2):212–219. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02981.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaux C, Danaé P, Wendland J. Predictive factors of women’s subjective perception of childbirth experience: a systematic review of the literature. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021;39(1):43–66. doi:10.1080/02646838.2020.1748582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y. A qualitative study of Chinese women’s fertility desire in light of the recent two-child policy. Master Thesis. Lund University. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Handelzalts JE, Levy S, Peled Y, et al. Mode of delivery, childbirth experience and postpartum sexuality. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(4):927–932. doi:10.1007/s00404-018-4693-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng R, Tang X, Liu J, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request and its influencing factors in Chongqing, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):384. doi:10.1186/s12884-021-03866-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan J, Wang L, Yang Y, et al. The trend of caesarean birth rate changes in China after ‘universal two-child policy’era: a population-based study in 2013–2018. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):249. doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01714-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon C, Downe S, Betran AP. Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section targeted at organisations, facilities and systems: systematic review of qualitative studies. PLOS One. 2018;13(9):e0203274. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelhafen S, Trachsel M, Monteverde S, et al. Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey of women in Switzerland. J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):369. doi:10.1186/s12884-021-03826-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildingsson I, Karlström A, Larsson B. Childbirth experience in women participating in a continuity of midwifery care project. Women Birth. 2021;34(3):e255–e261. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien D, Butler MM, Casey M. The importance of nurturing trusting relationships to embed shared decision-making during pregnancy and childbirth. Midwifery. 2021;98:102987. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2021.102987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka E, Ohinato J, Kohyama M, et al. Modernization and transformation of Reproduction in Southeast Asia. 2006–2008 Scientific Research Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) Research Report. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Weng SS, Lin CL, Tai CJ, et al. Differences between native and immigrant women in Taiwan in factors associated with caesarean section: a prospective observational study. Women Health. 2017;57(10):1178–1192. doi:10.1080/03630242.2016.1243606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain S, Afifa Anjum M, Hasan T, et al. Self-perception of physical health conditions and its association with depression and anxiety among Bangladeshi university students. J Affect Disord. 2020;263:282–288. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smarandache A, Kim THM, Bohr Y, et al. Predictors of a negative labour and birth experience based on a national survey of Canadian women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):114. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0903-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viirman F, Hesselman S, Wikström AK, et al. Negative childbirth experience–what matters most? a register-based study of risk factors in three time periods during pregnancy. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022;34:100779. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Y, Zhang RQ. The causes and adjustment methods of prenatal anxiety disorder during the Han and Tang Dynasties. Zhonghua yi shi za zhi (Beijing, China: 1980). 2016;46(5):264–267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leinweber J, Fontein‐Kuipers Y, Karlsdottir SI, et al. Developing a woman‐centered, inclusive definition of positive childbirth experiences: a discussion paper. Birth. 2023;50(2):362–383. doi:10.1111/birt.12666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Deng Z, Evans R, et al. Social media landscape of the tertiary referral hospitals in China: observational descriptive study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(8):e249. doi:10.2196/jmir.9607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling.2012.
   Google Scholar
• Malacrida C, Boulton T. The best laid plans? Women’s choices, expectations and experiences in childbirth. Health. 2014;18(1):41–59. doi:10.1177/1363459313476964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min H, Liang S, Gu CY, et al. A cross-sectional study on the implementation of labor pain management service in midwifery institutions of the Pan-Yangtze River Delta. Fudan Univ J Med Sci. 2023;50(3):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chen F. Analyze the impact of LDR integrated delivery room nursing mode on the delivery mode, delivery results, and delivery process of primiparous women. J Pract Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;7(27):122–123.
   Google Scholar
• Bohren MA, Berger BO, Munthe‐Kaas H, et al. Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3(3):CD012449. (doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012449.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu XN. Research on the correlation between the scores of current medical service process quality assessment indicators and patient satisfaction. Doctoral thesis, PhD. Peking Union Medical College. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Afulani PA, Buback L, McNally B, et al. A rapid review of available evidence to inform indicators for routine monitoring and evaluation of respectful maternity care. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020;8(1):125–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInnes RJ, Aitken-Arbuckle A, Lake S, et al. Implementing continuity of midwife carer–just a friendly face? A realist evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):304. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05159-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton CH, Simkin P. Can respectful maternity care save and improve lives? Birth. 2019;46(3):391–395. doi:10.1111/birt.12444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalonde A, Herschderfer K, Pascali‐Bonaro D, et al. The international childbirth initiative: 12 steps to safe and respectful motherbaby–family maternity care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;146(1):65–73. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Wu J, Yang H, et al. Factors associated with childbirth self-efficacy: a multicenter cross-sectional study in China. Midwifery. 2021;93:102883. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2020.102883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muggleton S, Davis D, Fowler C, et al. Salutogenic childbirth education raises sense of coherence: a longitudinal survey. Midwifery. 2021;103:103138. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2021.103138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuba U, Zehra G. Effect of an educational program based on cognitive behavioral techniques on fear of childbirth and the birth process. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2019;40(2):146–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar