Custom ocular prosthesis-related concerns: patient feedback survey-based report vis-à-vis objective clinical grading scales

References

• Clarke A, Rumsey N, Collin JR, Wyn-Williams M. Psychosocial distress associated with disfiguring eye conditions. Eye (Lond). 2003;17:35–40. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6700234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBain HB, Ezra DG, Rose GE, Newman SP. Appearance Research Collaboration (ARC). The psychosocial impact of living with an ocular prosthesis. Orbit. 2014;33:39–44. doi:10.3109/01676830.2013.851251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rokohl AC, Koch KR, Trester M, Trester W, Pine KR, Heindl LM, et al. Concerns of anophthalmic patients wearing cryolite glass prosthetic eyes. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;34:369–374. doi:10.1097/IOP.0000000000001021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine NS, de Terte I, Pine KR. An investigation into discharge, visual perception, and appearance concerns of prosthetic eye wearers. Orbit. 2017 Dec;36(6):401–406. doi:10.1080/01676830.2017.1337201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine K, Sloan B, Stewart J, Jacobs RJ. Concerns of anophthalmic patients wearing artificial eyes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;39:47–52. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02381.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn JM, Lee SY, Yoon JS. Health-related quality of life and emotional status of anophthalmic patients in Korea. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:1005–1011. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatamleh MM, Abbariki M, Alqudah N, Cook AE. Survey of ocular prosthetics rehabilitation in the United Kingdom, part 1: anophthalmic patients’ aetiology, opinions, and attitudes. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:1293–1296. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000003370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatamleh MM, Alnazzawi AA, Abbariki M, Alqudah N, Cook AE. Survey of ocular prosthetics rehabilitation in the United Kingdom, part 2: anophthalmic patients’ satisfaction and acceptance. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:1297–1301. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000003656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM, Bannwart LC, Moreno A, Pesqueira AA, Haddad MF, et al. Psychosocial impact on anophthalmic patients wearing ocular prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42:113–119. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2012.05.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen ML. Complications from eye prosthesis. Ugeskr Laeger. 2008;170:2456–2458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Song JS, Oh J, Baek SH. A survey of satisfaction in anophthalmic patients wearing ocular prosthesis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:330–335. doi:10.1007/s00417-005-0037-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltreider SA, Lucarelli MJ. A simple algorithm for selection of implant size for enucleation and evisceration: a prospective study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18:336–341. doi:10.1097/00002341-200209000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee V, Konrad H, Bunce C, Nelson C, Collin JRO. Aetiology and surgical treatment of childhood blepharoptosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:1282–1286. doi:10.1136/bjo.86.11.1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakra T, Simon GJ, Douglas RS, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA, et al. Comparing outcomes of enucleation and evisceration. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:2270‐2275. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dave TV, Kumar S, Vasanthalin J, Kaliki S, Ali MJ, Naik MN, et al. Development and validation of a grading scale for custom ocular prosthesis. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:1426‐1430. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicodemo D, Ferreira LM. Questionnaire of the psychosocial profile of the patient with anophthalmia with indication of ocular prosthesis. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006;69:463–470. doi:10.1590/S0004-27492006000400002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Senra H, Barbosa F, Ferreira P, Vieira CR, Perrin PB, Rogers H, et al. Psychologic adjustment to irreversible vision loss in adults: a systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2015;12:851–861. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.022.
   Google Scholar
• Nyman SR, Dibb B, Victor CR, Gosney MA. Emotional well-being and adjustment to vision loss in later life: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:971–981. doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.626487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J, Lou L, Jin K, Xu Y, Ye X, Moss T, et al. Vision-related quality of life and appearance concerns are associated with anxiety and depression after eye enucleation: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136460. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokohl AC, Koch KR, Adler W, Trester M, Trester W, Pine NS, et al. Concerns of anophthalmic patients-a comparison between cryolite glass and polymethyl methacrylate prosthetic eye wearers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256:1203–1208. doi:10.1007/s00417-018-3942-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh V, Chiam N, Sundar G. Survey of common practices among oculofacial surgeons in the Asia-Pacific region: evisceration, enucleation and management of anophthalmic sockets. Orbit. 2014;33:477. doi:10.3109/01676830.2014.950293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah RD, Singa RM, Aakalu VK, Setabutr P. Evisceration and enucleation: a national survey of practice patterns in the United States. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2012;43:425–430. doi:10.3928/15428877-20120725-01.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GW S, Yen MT. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20:274–280. doi:10.1097/01.IOP.0000129528.16938.1E.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan P, Sagoo MS, Olver JM. UK national survey of enucleation, evisceration and orbital implant trends. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:616–619. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.103937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riau AK, Mondal D, Setiawan M, Palaniappan A, Yam GHF, Liedberg B, et al. Functionalization of the polymeric surface with bioceramic nanoparticles via a novel, nonthermal dip coating method. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:35565–35577. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b12371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar