Advanced search
Publication Cover
Orbit
The International Journal on Orbital Disorders, Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery
Volume 41, 2022 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
276
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Investigation

Utilizing a mobile platform to obtain quantitative measurements of exophthalmos

Maja Magazina Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GeorgiaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2341-2350
ORCID Icon,
Ann Q. Tranb Department of Ophthalmology, almology, Mayo Clinic, Manhattan Eye Ear Nose Throat Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
&
Andrea A. Tooleyc Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5818-0073
ORCID Icon
Pages 591-597 | Received 08 Jun 2021, Accepted 09 Sep 2021, Published online: 19 Sep 2021

References

  • Kashkouli MB, Beigi B, Noorani MH, Nojoomi M. Hertel Exophthalmometry: reliability and interobserver variation. Orbit. 2003;22(4):239–245. doi:10.1076/orbi.22.4.239.17245.
  • O’Donnel NP, Virdi M, Kemp EG. Hertel exophthalmometry: the most appropriate measuring technique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:1097.
  • Lam AKC, Lam C, Leung W, Hung P. Intra-observer and inter-observer variation of Hertel exophthalmometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29:472–476. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00617.x.
  • Segni M, Bartley GB, Garrity JA, Bergstralh EJ, Gorman CA. Comparability of proptosis measurements by different techniques. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133(6):813–818. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01429-0.
  • Musch DC, Frueh BR, Landis JR. The reliability of Hertel exophthalmometry. Observer variation between physician and lay readers. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(9):1177–1180. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(85)33880-0.
  • Mourits MP, Lombardo SHC, Sluijs FA, Fenton S. Reliability of exophthalmos measurement and the exophthalmometry value distribution in a healthy Dutch population in Grave’s patients. An exploratory study. Orbit. 2004;23(3):161–168. doi:10.1080/01676830490504089.
  • Sleep TJ, Manners RM. Interinstrument variability in hertel-type exophthalmometers. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18(4):254–257. doi:10.1097/00002341-200207000-00004.
  • Chang AA, Bakn A, Francis IC, Kappagoda MB. Clinical exophthalmometry: a comparative study of the Lued and Hertel exophthalmometer. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1995;23:315–318. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.1995.tb00182.x.
  • Vardizer Y, Berendschot TJM, Mourits MP. Effect of exophthalmometer design on its accuracy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(6):427–430. doi:10.1097/01.iop.0000180066.87572.39.
  • Choi KJ, Lee MJ. Comparison of exophthalmos measurements: Hertel exophthalmometer versus orbital parameters in 2-dimensional computed tomography. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53(4):384–390. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.10.015.
  • Ramli N, Kala S, Samsudin A, Rahmat K, Abidin ZZ. Proptosis- Correlation and Agreement between Hertel exophthalmometry and computed tomography. Orbit. 2015;34(5):257–262. doi:10.3109/01676830.2015.1057291.
  • Minh TN. Ruler-pro- measure tools. Version 1.5.9. Phoenix solutions. Apple. Accessed November 1, 2020.
  • Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):144–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
  • ULCA Statistical Consulting. What does Cronbach’s alpha mean? https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/spss/faq/what-does-cronbachs-alpha-mean. Accessed November 15, 2020.
  • Almog Y, Rosen E, Nemet AY. Slit-lamp exophthalmometry, a novel technique. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:1161–1164. doi:10.1007/s00417-014-2620-8.
  • Ameri H, Fenton S. Comparison of unilateral simultaneous bilateral measurements of the globe position using the Hertel exophthalmometer. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20(6):448–451. doi:10.1097/01.IOP.0000143712.42344.8C.
  • Davanger M. Principles and sources of error in the exophthalmometry. A new exophthalmometer. Acta Ophthalmol. 1970;48:625–633.
  • Frueh BR, Garber F, Grill R, Musch DC. Positional effects on exophthalmometer readings in Graves’ eye disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:1355–1356. doi:10.1001/archopht.1985.01050090107043.
  • Genders SW, Mourits DL, Jasem M, Kloos RJHM, Saees P, Mourits MP. Parallax-free exophthalmometry: a comprehensive review of the literature on clinical exophthalmometry and the introduction of the first parallax- free exophthalmometer. Orbit. 2015;34(1):23–29. doi:10.3109/01676830.2014.963877.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.