Acellular cadaveric dermal matrix grafts for orbital wall reconstruction in patients with sinonasal malignancies

References

• Nazar G, Rodrigo JP, Llorente JL, Baragano L, Suarez C. Prognostic factors of maxillary sinus malignancies. Am J Rhinol. 2004;18(4):233–238. doi:10.1177/194589240401800408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imola MJ, Schramm VL Jr. Orbital preservation in surgical management of sinonasal malignancy. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(8):1357–1365. doi:10.1097/00005537-200208000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis E, Tan Y. Assessment of internal orbital reconstructions for pure blowout fractures: cranial bone grafts versus titanium mesh. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(4):442‐453. doi:10.1053/joms.2003.50085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter JK, Ellis E. Biomaterials for reconstruction of the internal orbit. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(10):1280–1297. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2004.04.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer S, Thankappan K. Maxillary reconstruction: current concepts and controversies. Indian J Plast Surg. 2014;47(1):8–19. doi:10.4103/0970-0358.129618.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nahabedian MY. Acellular dermal matrices in primary breast reconstruction: principles, concepts, and indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:44S–53S. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31825f2215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan SA, Dailey RA. Graft contraction: a comparison of acellular dermis versus hard palate mucosa in lower eyelid surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19(1):14–24. doi:10.1097/00002341-200301000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips BT, Bishawi M, Dagum AB, Bui DT, Khan SU. A systematic review of infection rates and associated antibiotic duration in acellular dermal matrix breast reconstruction. Eplasty. 2014;14:e42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanasono MM, Silva AK, Yu P, Skoracki RJ, Comprehensive A. Algorithm for oncologic maxillary reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1):47–60. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729e73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janecka IP. New reconstructive technologies in skull base surgery: role of titanium mesh and porous polyethylene. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(3):396–401. doi:10.1001/archotol.126.3.396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee JT, Frank DN, Ramakrishnan V. Microbiome of the paranasal sinuses: update and literature review. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2016;30(1):3–16. doi:10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani K, Jung RE, Molenberg A, Hammerle CH. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:616–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyame TT, Lemon KP, Kolter R, Liao EC. High-throughput assay for bacterial adhesion on acellular dermal matrices and synthetic surgical materials. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):1061–1068. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b65af.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal JS, Rahman NA, Knights J, Ghani H, Alburquerque RF. The effect of different surface topographies of titanium implants on bacterial biofilm: a systematic review. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1;615(2):117–126. doi:10.1016/0006-2944(75)90147-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaisrie SC, Malekzadeh S, Biedlingmaier JF. In vivo analysis of bacterial biofilm formation on facial plastic bioimplants. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(11 Pt 1):1733–1738. doi:10.1097/00005537-199811000-00026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(2):429–436. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahabedian MY. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):1743–1753. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf8087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonell AM, Matthews BD, Dréau D, Foster M, Austin CE, Kercher KW, et al. The susceptibility of prosthetic biomaterials to infection. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(3):430–435. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-8810-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarreal PM, Monje F, Morillo AJ, Junquera LM, Gonzalez C, Barbon JJ. Porous polyethylene implants in orbital floor reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(3): 877–87. doi:10.1097/00006534-200203000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HB, Nunery WR. Orbital adherence syndrome secondary to titanium implant material. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;25(1):33–36. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181929b6e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersey TL, Ng SG, Rosser P, Sloan B, Hart R. Orbital adherence with titanium mesh floor implants: a review of 10 cases. Orbit. 2013;32(1):8–11. doi:10.3109/01676830.2012.736597.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scofield-Kaplan SM, Patel SY, Mancini R. Orbital floor and rim reconstruction with a titanium orbital implant and acellular dermis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;35(1):e19–e21. doi:10.1097/IOP.0000000000001285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordeiro PG, Chen CM. A 15-year review of midface reconstruction after total and subtotal maxillectomy: part II. Technical modifications to maximize aesthetic and functional outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(1):139–147. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318221dc60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarallo M, Rizzo MI, Monarca C, Fanelli B, Parisi P, Scuderi N. Optimal care for eyelid contraction after radiotherapy: case report and literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(10):2459–2465. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2011.10.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney AR, Walker B, Bhrany AD, Chang SH, Jian-Amadi A. Ophthalmic changes following maxillectomy with or without postoperative radiation therapy. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(5):1448–1451. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000005437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar