The posterior auricular muscle complex graft as a porous orbital implant wrap: long-term follow-up over a 31-year period

References

• Shields CL, Shields JA, Eagle RC, De Potter P. Histopathologic evidence of fibrovascular ingrowth four weeks after placement of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111(3):363–366. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72323-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trichopoulos N, Augsburger JJ. Enucleation with unwrapped porous and nonporous orbital implants: a 15-year experience. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(5):331–336. doi:10.1097/01.iop.0000175034.88019.a5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remulla HD, Rubin PA, Shore JW, et al. Complications of porous spherical orbital implants. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(4):586–593. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30991-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayre GS, Lipham W, Dutton JJ. A comparison of rates of fibrovascular ingrowth in wrapped versus unwrapped hydroxyapatite spheres in a rabbit model. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18(4):275–280. doi:10.1097/00002341-200207000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik T, Yuksel D, Kosker M, Kasim R, Simsek S. Vascularization of coralline versus synthetic hydroxyapatite orbital implants assessed by gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Eye Res. 2015;40(3):346–353. doi:10.3109/02713683.2014.922192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah SU, Shields CL, Lally SE, Shields JA. Hydroxyapatite orbital implant in children following enucleation: analysis of 531 sockets. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;31(2):108–114. doi:10.1097/IOP.0000000000000207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon JS, Lew H, Kook KH, Lee SY. The use of autogenous sclera as wrapping material in hydroxyapatite implantation. Ophthalmologica. 2009;223(1):7–11. doi:10.1159/000161876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naugle TC Jr, Fry CL, Sabatier RE, Elliott LF. High leg incision fascia lata harvesting. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(9):1480–1488. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30107-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naugle TC, Lee AM, Haik BG, Callahan MA. Wrapping hydroxyapatite orbital implants with posterior auricular muscle complex grafts. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128(4):495–501. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00159-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis RJ, Delee JC, Drez DJ Jr. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with freeze dried fascia lata allografts in dogs. A preliminary report. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13(6):408–414. doi:10.1177/036354658501300608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford JS. Nature of fascia lata and its fate after implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;67(6):900–907. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(69)90084-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CW, Liao SL. Long-term complications of different porous orbital implants: a 21-year review. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(5):681–685. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan DR, Klapper SR, Gilberg SM, Dutton JJ, Wong A, Mawn L. The bioceramic implant: evaluation of implant exposures in 419 implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26(2):80–82. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b80c30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DW. Protruding auricle: a neuromuscular sign. Lancet. 1978;1(8067):747–749. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90860-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naugle TC, Lee WW, Couvillion S. Surgical technique: use of quilting sutures in ophthalmic plastic surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20(3):237–239. doi:10.1097/01.iop.0000129015.32503.a6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerra AB, Metzinger SE, Metzinger RC, Xie C, Xie Y, Rigby PL, et al. Variability of the postauricular muscle complex: analysis of 40 hemicadaver dissections. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6(5):342–347. doi:10.1001/archfaci.6.5.342.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown JB, Cannon B. Composite free grafts of skin and cartilage from the ear. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1946;82:253–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fry CF, Naugle TC. Posterior auricular muscle complex graft can be used for ocular implants. Ocular Surgery News U.S. Edition [News Article]. http://www.healio.com/ophthalmology/oculoplastics/news/print/ocular-surgery-news/%7B8faffa44-7304-471a-b9e6-9d50743393b5%7D/posterior-auricular-muscle-complex-graft-can-be-used-for-ocular-implants. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Liu CY, Sun MG, Jones S, Setabutr P. Posterior auricular muscle patch graft for exposed orbital implant. Orbit. 2019;38(2):144–147. doi:10.1080/01676830.2018.1463548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao SL, Kao SC, Tseng JH, Lin LL. Surgical coverage of exposed hydroxyapatite implant with retroauricular myoperiosteal graft. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(1):92–95. doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.038778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J-K, Lai P-C. Bioceramic orbital implant exposure repaired by a retroauricular myoperiosteal Graft. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008;39(5):399–403. doi:10.3928/15428877-20080901-17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medel R, Cicinelli MV, Arboleda Hurtado JC, Sánchez España JC, Bahamondes AT, Vasquez LM. Retroauricular myoperiosteal autograft for orbital implant exposure: 11 years of experience. Orbit. 2020;39(5):342–349. doi:10.1080/01676830.2019.1692039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon JS, Lew H, Kim SJ, Lee SY. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants a 15-year experience of 802 cases. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(3):566–572.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan DR, Klapper SR. Evaluation and management of the anophthalmic socket and socket reconstruction. In: Black E, Nesi F, Calvano C, Gladstone G, and Levine M, eds. Smith and Nesi’s Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2012:1146.
   Google Scholar
• Wladis EJ, Aakalu VK, Sobel RK, Yen MT, Bilyk JR, Mawn LA. Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(2):311–317. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwitry A, West S, King J, Foss AJ, Abercrombie LC. Long-term follow-up of porous polyethylene spherical implants after enucleation and evisceration. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23(1):11–15. doi:10.1097/01.iop.0000249429.02757.6b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dave TV, Das AV, Mohapatra S, Bansal O, Ganguly A. Outcomes and complications of evisceration with primary implant: an electronic medical record driven analytics of 1800 cases. Orbit. 2022;41(6):717–725. doi:10.1080/01676830.2021.1998915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massry GG, Holds JB. Evisceration with scleral modification. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;17(1):42–47. doi:10.1097/00002341-200101000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tari AS, Malihi M, Kasaee A, Tabatabaie SZ, Hamzedust K, Musavi MF, et al. Enucleation with hydroxyapatite implantation versus evisceration plus scleral quadrisection and alloplastic implantation. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;25(2):130–133. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181984dfe.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan DR, Klapper SR. Enucleation and orbital implants. In: Singh A, Damato B, Pe’er J, Murphree A Perry J, eds. Clinical Ophthalmic Oncology. Saunders Elsevier Inc; 2007:586. doi:10.1016/B978-1-4160-3167-3.50001-2.
   Google Scholar
• Suter AJ, Molteno AC, Bevin TH, Fulton JD, Herbison P. Long term follow up of bone derived hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(11):1287–1292. doi:10.1136/bjo.86.11.1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourits DL, Moll AC, Bosscha MI, Tan HS, Hartong DT. Orbital implants in retinoblastoma patients: 23 years of experience and a review of the literature. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(2):165–174. doi:10.1111/aos.12915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaee Z, Mazloumi M, Rajabi MT, Khalilzadeh O, Kassaee A, Moghimi S, et al. Comparison of the exposure rate of wrapped hydroxyapatite (bio-Eye) versus unwrapped porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implants in enucleated patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27(2):114–118. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181e9790d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal S, Kremer C, Engelhard S, Johnson S. Comparison of locally sourced pericardium and other conventional patch graft materials in a Glaucoma drainage device surgery. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2021;15(1):14–18. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shokrollahi K, Taylor JP, Le Roux CM, Ashton MW, Rozen WM, Jones NS, et al. The postauricular fascia: classification, anatomy, and potential surgical applications. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(1):92–97. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31826cb2b5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin PA, Popham JK, Bilyk JR, Shore JW. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;10(2):96–103. doi:10.1097/00002341-199406000-00005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galluzzi P, De Francesco S, Giacalone G, Cerase A, Monti L, Vallone IM, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of fibrovascular tissue ingrowth within synthetic hydroxyapatite orbital implants in children. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;21(5):521–528. doi:10.5301/EJO.2011.6298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapper SR, Jordan DR, Ells A, Grahovac S. Hydroxyapatite orbital implant vascularization assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19(1):46–52. doi:10.1097/00002341-200301000-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan DR, Brownstein S, Dorey M, Yuen VH, Gilberg S. Fibrovascularization of porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant in a rabbit model. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20(2):136–143. doi:10.1097/01.iop.0000117341.28846.7f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Custer PL, Trinkaus KM. Porous implant exposure: Incidence, management, and morbidity. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23(1):1–7. doi:10.1097/01.iop.0000249432.18688.ee.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang P, Kim JW, McGovern K, Reid MW, Subramanian K, Murphree AL, et al. Porous orbital implant after enucleation in retinoblastoma patients: indications and complications. Orbit. 2018;37(6):438–443. doi:10.1080/01676830.2018.1440605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar