Selection of freestanding and bound gender-marking morphemes in speech production: a review

References

• Abdel Rahman, R., & Aristei, S. (2010). Now you see it … and now again: Semantic interference reflects lexical competition in speech production with and without articulation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 657–661. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.5.657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alario, F. X., Ayora, P., Costa, A., & Melinger, A. (2008). Grammatical and nongrammatical contributions to closed-class word selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 960–981. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alario, F. X., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The production of determiners: Evidence from French. Cognition, 82, 179–223. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00158-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordag, D., & Pechmann, T. (2008). Grammatical gender in speech production: Evidence from Czech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 69–85. doi:10.1007/s10936-007-9060-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Miozzo, M., Costa, A., Schiller, N. O., & Alario, F. X. (2001). A crosslinguistic investigation of determiner production. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, brain, and cognitive development: Essays in the honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 209–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A., Kovacic, D., Fedorenko, E., & Caramazza, A. (2003). The gender-congruency effect and the selection of freestanding and bound morphemes: Evidence from Croatian. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1270–1282. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., Sebastian-Galles, N., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). The gender congruity effect: Evidence from Spanish and Catalan. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 381–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex, 42, 790–796. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70419-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucart, A., Branigan, H. P., & Bard, E. G. (2010). Determiner selection in romance languages: Evidence from French. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1414–1421. doi:10.1037/a0020432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640–654. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., & Caramazza, A. (2003). The selection of closed-class words in noun phrase production: The case of Dutch determiners. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 635–652. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00531-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Schirm, W., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 249–256. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., Hahne, A., Hoffmann, S., & Wagner, V. (2006). Phonological activation of category coordinates during speech planning is observable in children but not in adults: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 373–386. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., Hantsch, A., & Schriefers, H. (2005). Context effects on lexical choice and activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 905–920. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1998). Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1256–1274. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.5.1256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16, 400–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E. (1998). The gender congruency effect in picture–word tasks. Psychological Research, 61, 209–219. doi:10.1007/s004260050026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., Schriefers, H., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2006). The processing of free and bound gender-marked morphemes in speech production: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 437–442. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture–word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485–495. doi:10.3758/BF03198265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mädebach, A., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Curda, C., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2011). Is there semantic interference in delayed naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 37, 522–538. doi:10.1037/a0021970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture–word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 503–535. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 907–922. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The absence of a gender congruency effect in romance languages: A matter of stimulus onset asynchrony? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 388–391. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.28.2.388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. R., & Savoy. P (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 539–557. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V. M., Roelofs, A., & Schriefers, H. (2011). Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Role of task decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 404–423. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107–142. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., Piai, V., & Schriefers, H. (2011). Selective attention and distractor frequency in naming performance: Comment on Dhooge and Hartsuiker (2011). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1032–1038. doi:10.1037/a0023328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosinski, R. (1977). Picture–word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 48, 643–647. doi:10.2307/1128667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 169–194. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00508-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O., & Costa, A. (2006). Different selection principles of freestanding and bound morphemes in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1201–1207. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 841–850. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.19.4.841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Jescheniak, J. D., & Hantsch, A. (2002). Determiner selection in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 941–950. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.28.5.941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Jescheniak, J. D., & Hantsch, A. (2005). Lexical competition during the selection of gender-marked morphemes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 159–168. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture–word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (1999). The production of noun phrases: A cross-linguistic comparison of German and French. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 637–642). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (2000). Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: The gender interference effect in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1368–1377. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalek, K., Bock, K., & Schriefers, H. (2010). A purple giraffe is faster than a purple elephant: Inconsistent phonology affects determiner selection in English. Cognition, 114, 123–128. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalek, K., & Schriefers, H. (2005). Dominance affects determiner selection in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 103–119. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686–698. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 896–918. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.4.896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, G. (1976). Semantic interference from unattended printed words. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 327–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkum, J. J. A. (1997). Syntactic processes in speech production: The retrieval of grammatical gender. Cognition, 64, 115–152. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00026-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar