The time course of consonant and vowel processing during word recognition

References

• Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2010). On the role of consonants and vowels in visual-word processing Evidence with a letter search paradigm. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 423–438. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146–184. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonatti, L. L., Penã, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2005). Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychological Science, 16, 451–459. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01565.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, D., & Miceli, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature, 403, 428–430. doi:10.1038/35000206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Molinaro, N. (2009). Consonants and vowels contribute differently to visual word recognition: ERPs of relative position priming. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2659–2670. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2007). ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: Are consonants processed differently from vowels? Neuroscience Letters, 419, 219–224. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.04.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2009). ERP correlates of transposed-letter priming effects: The role of vowels vs. consonants. Psychophysiology, 46, 34–42. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00725.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, L. (2000). The assembly of phonology in Italian and English: Consonants and vowels. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 377–397). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, L., Zorzi, M., Cubelli, R., & Brivio, C. (2003). The status of consonants and vowels in phonological assembly: Testing the two-cycles model with Italian. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 405–433. doi:10.1080/09541440303605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubelli, R. (1991). A selective deficit for writing vowels in acquired dysgraphia. Nature, 353, 258–260. doi:10.1038/353258a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Sebastian-Galles, N., Soler-Vilageliu, O., & van Ooijen, B. (2000). Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: Cross-linguistic comparisons. Memory & Cognition, 28, 746–755. doi:10.3758/BF03198409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–758. doi:10.1037/a0019738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 668. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1550. doi:10.1037/a0014253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 335–341. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moor, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research, 63, 159–162. doi:10.1007/PL00008174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011) The relative position priming effect depends on whether letters are vowels or consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1143–1163. doi:10.1037/a0023577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353–372. doi:10.1080/02724989208250619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1993). The time-course of phonological and orthographic code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 119–122.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreres, A. R., Lòpez, C. V., & China, N. N. (2003). Phonological alexia with vowel–consonant dissociation in non-word reading. Brain and Language, 84, 399–413. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00559-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218–233. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 623–647. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Granier, J. P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865–884. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havy, M., Bertoncini, J., & Nazzi, T. (2011). Word learning and phonetic processing in preschool age children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 25–43. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havy, M., & Nazzi, T. (2009). Better processing of consonantal over vocalic information in word learning at 16 months of age. Infancy, 14, 439–456. doi:10.1080/15250000902996532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (2000). An evaluation of the two-cycles model of phonology assembly. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 183–207. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed letter priming effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 93–116. doi:10.1080/01690960701579714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.88.5.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler, J., Penã, M., Nespor, M., & Bonatti, L. (2006). The “soul” of language does not use statistics: Reflections on vowels and consonants. Cortex, 42, 846–854. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70427-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T. (2005). Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: Differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition, 98, 13–30. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T., & Bertoncini, J. (2009). Phonetic specificity in early lexical acquisition: New evidence from consonants in coda positions. Language and Speech, 52, 463–480. doi:10.1177/0023830909336584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T., Floccia, C., Moquet, B., & Butler, J. (2009). Bias for consonantal over vocalic information in French-and English-learning 30-month-olds: Crosslinguistic evidence in early word learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 522–537. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi, T., & New, B. (2007). Beyond stop consonants: Consonantal specificity in early lexical acquisition. Cognitive Development, 22, 271–279. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, M., Penã, M., & Mehler, J. (2003). On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio, 2, 221–247.
   Google Scholar
• New, B., Araùjo, V., & Nazzi, T. (2008). Differential processing of consonants and vowels in lexical access through reading. Psychological Science, 19, 1223–1227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02228.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004) Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 516–524. doi:10.3758/BF03195598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L’ Année Pschologique, 101, 447–462. doi:10.3406/psy.2001.1341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231–246. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2002). On the nature of phonological assembly: Evidence from backward masking. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 31–59. doi:10.1080/01690960042000157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons, F., & Toro, J. M. (2010). Structural generalizations over consonants and vowels in 11-month-old infants. Cognition, 116, 361–367. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 97–145. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, D. J., Scott, S. K., Cutler, A., & Wise, R. J. (2005). Lexical retrieval constrained by sound structure: The role of the left inferior frontal gyrus. Brain and Language, 92, 309–319. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro, J. M., Nespor, M., Mehler, J., & Bonatti, L. (2008). Finding words and rules in a speech stream: Functional differences between vowels and consonants. Psychological Science, 19, 137–144. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02059.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 96–101. doi:10.3758/BF03196144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221–243. doi:10.3758/BF03196158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, C., & Cornelissen, P. (2008). SERIOL reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 143–164. doi:10.1080/01690960701579771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., & Grainger, J. (2000). Visual and phonological codes in letter and word recognition: Evidence from incremental priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 671–692. doi:10.1080/713755906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar