The perceptual nature of stress shifts

References

• Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random-effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, M. E., & Edwards J.. 1994). Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In P. A. Keating (Ed.), Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III (pp. 7–33). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, M. E., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). International structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–310. doi:10.1017/S095267570000066X
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, M. E., Swora, M. G., Rauschenberg, J., & de Jong, J. (1990). Stress shift, stress clash, and polysyllabic shortening in a prosodically annotated discourse. Proceedings of the 1990 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Vol. 1, pp. 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2005). PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.14) [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. E., & Eady, S. J. (1986). Metrical phonology in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 369–384. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90007-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (1984). Stress and accent in language production and understanding. In D. Gibbon (Ed.), Intonation, accent, and rhythm: Studies in discourse phonology (pp. 77–90). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Dainora, A., & Hemphill, R. (1996). Rhythmic factors and contrastive stress in spontaneous speech. LabPhon 5: Fifth Conference on Laboratory Phonology 5, Evanston, Illinois. GISSL workshop, Girona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilley, L. C., Mattys, S., & Vinke, L. (2010). Potent prosody: Comparing the effects of distal prosody, proximal prosody, and semantic context on word segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 274–294. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fear, B. D., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1997). The strong/weak syllable distinction in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(3), 1893–1904. doi:10.1121/1.412063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, E., & Warren, P. (1995). Stress shift: Do speakers do it or do listeners hear it?. In B. Connell & A. Arvaniti (Eds.), Phonology and phonetic evidence: Papers in laboratory phonology 4 (pp. 95–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gussenhoven, C. (1991) The English rhythm as an accent deletion rule. Phonology, 8(1), 1–35. doi:10.1017/S0952675700001263
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. P. (1984). The phonology of rhythm in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 33–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. H., & Bock, J. K. (1988). Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 389–403. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochanski, G., Grabe, E., Coleman, J., & Rosner, B. (2005). Loudness predicts prominence: Fundamental frequency lends little. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(2), 1038–1054. doi:10.1121/1.1923349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M., & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 249–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, P. H. (1960). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32(4), 451–454. doi:10.1121/1.1908095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., White, L., & Melhorn, J. F. (2005). Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 477–500. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, S., Hestvik, A., & Vogel, I. (2013). Perception and bias in the processing of compound versus phrasal stress: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Speech, 56(1), 23–44. doi:10.1177/0023830911434277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengel, A. (1998). Deutscher Wortakzent: Symbole, Signale [German Lexical Stress: Symbols and Signals]. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 46(2–3), 115–154. doi:10.1177/00238309030460020501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quené, H., & Port, R. F. (2002). Rhythmical factors in stress shift. Paper presented at the 38th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73(3), 265–292. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00058-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca, I., & Johnson, W. (1999). A course in phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, A. G. (1981). Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(4), 474–494. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.4.474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. (1995). Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 550–569). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1995). The importance of phonological transcription in empirical approaches to “stress shift” vs. “early accent”: Comments on Grabe and Warren, and Vogel, Bunnell and Hoskins. In B. Connell & A. Arvaniti (Eds.), Phonology and phonetic evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology 4 (pp. 128–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sluijter, A., van Heuven, V. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 100(4), 2471–2485. doi:10.1121/1.417955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temperley, D. (2009). Distributional stress regularity: A corpus study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38(1), 75–92. doi:10.1007/s10936-008-9084-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, I. H., Bunnell, T., & Hoskins, S. (1995). The phonology and phonetics of the rhythm rule. In B. Connell & A. Arvaniti, Phonology and phonetic evidence: Papers in laboratory phonology 4 (pp. 111–127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, P. S. (2002). Vorhersage und Wahrnehmung deutscher Betonungsmuster [The Prediction and Percerption of German Intonation Patterns]. Bonn: Rhenischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universit'at zu Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, P., & Fischenbeck, E. (2002). Stress perception and production in German Stress Clash Environments. Paper presented at the Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167(3917), 392–393. doi:10.1126/science.167.3917.392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, R. M., & Sherman, G. L. (1974). Phonemic restoration based on subsequent context. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 150–156. doi:10.3758/BF03203268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar