Relative speed of processing affects interference in Stroop and picture–word interference paradigms: evidence from the distractor frequency effect

References

• Abdel Rahman, R., & Aristei, S. (2010). Now you see it… and now again: Semantic interference reflects lexical competition in speech production with and without articulation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 657–661. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.5.657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 560–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, J. S. (1994). Identity primes produce facilitation in a colour naming task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47, 957–1000. doi:10.1080/14640749408401103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, J. S. (2002). Why do non-color words interfere with color naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1019–1038. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, I. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 33, 497–505. doi:10.1080/14640748108400805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 171–237. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.2356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 878–891. doi:10.1037/a0019128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). The distractor frequency effect in a delayed picture-word interference task: Further evidence for a late locus of distractor exclusion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 116–122. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0026-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K., & MacLeod, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 622–639. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35(1), 116–124. doi:10.3758/BF03195503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox, L. A., Shor, R. E., & Steinman, R. J. (1971). Semantic gradients and interference in naming color, spatial direction, and numerosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91(1), 59–65. doi:10.1037/h0031850
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640–654. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, M. O., & Glaser, W R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 875–894. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.6.875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13–42. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hantsch, A., & Mädebach, A. (2011). What does the articulatory output buffer know about alternative picture names? Evidence against the response-exclusion hypothesis. Language and Cognitive Process, 28, 684–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N. (2013). Response exclusion in word–word tasks: A comment on Roelofs, Piai and Schriefers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 672–678. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.746715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Melinger, A, Mahon, B. Z., Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2010). The word class effect in the picture–word interference paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1233–1246. doi:10.1080/17470210903377380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, A. T., & Hely, D. C. (2008). The role of valence and frequency in the emotional Stroop task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 956–960. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.5.956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T., & Plaut, D. C. (2000). Strategic control in word reading: Evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 719–750. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T., & Plaut, D. C. (2003). Strategic control over rate of processing in word reading: A computational investigation. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 207–232. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00512-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieley, J. M., & Hartley, A. A. (1997). Age-related equivalence of identity suppression in the Stroop color-word task. Psychology and Aging, 12(1), 22–29. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.1.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S., & Mozer, M. C. (2006). How lexical decision is affected by recent experience: Symmetric versus asymmetric frequency-blocking effects. Memory & Cognition, 34(3), 726–742. doi:10.3758/BF03193591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S., Mozer, M., & Forster, K. I. (2011). Dynamic adaptation to history of trial difficulty explains the effect of congruency proportion on masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 622–636. doi:10.1037/a0024230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576–588. doi:10.2307/1420768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klopfer, D. S. (1996). Stroop Interference and color-word similarity. Psychology Science, 7, 150–157. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485–495. doi:10.3758/BF03198265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., & Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 570–590. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., Kinoshita, S., Coltheart, M., & Taylor, T. (2003). Mixing costs and mixing benefits in naming words, pictures, and sums. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 556–575. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00094-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mädebach, A., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Curda, C., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2011). Is there semantic interference in delayed naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 522–538. doi:10.1037/a0021970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 503–535. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 131–147. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00509-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in picture–word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228–252. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S., Taylor, T. J., & Murphy, K. (2001). Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? Memory & Cognition, 29, 137–151. doi:10.3758/BF03195748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Selective attention to words and colours. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 387–397. doi:10.1080/14640747308400360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulatti, C., & Coltheart, M. (2012). Picture-word interference and the response exclusion hypothesis. Cortex, 48, 363–372. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., & Mahon, B. (2013). A rose by any other name is still a rose: A reinterpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 701–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechmann, T., Garrett, M., & Zerbst, D. (2004). The time course of recovery for grammatical class information during lexical processing for syntactic construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 723–728. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechmann, T., & Zerbst, D. (2002). The activation of word class information during speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 233–243. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V., Roelofs, A., & Schriefers, H. (2011). Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 404–423. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Kinoshita, S., Lupker, S. J., & Coltheart, M. (2003). Cross-task strategic effects. Memory & Cognition, 31, 867–876. doi:10.3758/BF03196441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88–125. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2005). From Popper to Lakatos: A case for cumulative computational modeling. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp. 313–330). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., Piai, V., & Schriefers, H. (2011). Selective attention and distractor frequency in naming performance: Comment on Dhooge and Hartsuiker (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1032–1038. doi:10.1037/a0023328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., Piai, V., & Schriefers, H. (2013). Context effects and selective attention in picture naming and word reading: Competition versus response exclusion. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 655–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosinski, R. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Kukish, K. S. (1975). Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. Child Development, 46, 247–253. doi:10.2307/1128859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. E., & Lupker, S. J. (2001). Sequential effects in naming: A time-criterion account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27(1), 117–138. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. E., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Time perception and word recognition: An elaboration of the time-criterion account. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 933–945. doi:10.3758/BF03193356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. E., & Lupker, S. J. (2007). Sequential effects in time perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 70–74. doi:10.3758/BF03194030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (1994). Effects of truncation on reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(1), 34–80. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.123.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., & Siri, S. (2005). Semantic similarity and grammatical class in naming actions. Cognition, 94, B91–B100. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar