Effects of semantic integration on subject–verb agreement: evidence from Dutch

References

• Allum, P. H., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2007). Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 33, 791–810. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anton-Mendez, I., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Morphophonological and conceptual effects on Dutch subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 728–748. doi:10.1080/01690960903513818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801686
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R: Using the lme4 package. R News: The Newsletter of the R Project, 5(1), 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, T. (1998). The resolution of number conflicts in English and German agreement patterns. Linguistics, 36(1), 41–70. doi:10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.41
   Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Cutting, J. C. (1992). Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(1), 99–127. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90007-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Eberhard, K. M. (1993). Meaning, sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(1), 57–99. doi:10.1080/01690969308406949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., Eberhard, K. M., & Cutting, J. C. (2004). Producing number agreement: How pronouns equal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 251–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Middleton, E. L. (2011). Reaching agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29, 1033–1069. doi:10.1007/s11049-011-9148-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23(1), 45–93. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(91)90003-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., Nicol, J., & Cutting, J. C. (1999). The ties that bind: Creating number agreement in speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 330–346. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.1, retrieved 1 October 2010 from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, L., & Bock, K. (2013). What counts in grammatical number agreement? Cognition, 128(2), 149–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (1981). Speech errors – Old data in search of new theories. Linguistics, 19, 627–662. doi:10.1515/ling.1981.19.7-8.627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M. (1997). The marked effect of number on subject–Verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(2), 147–164. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M. (1999). The accessibility of conceptual number to the processes of subject-verb agreement in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 560–578. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., & Bock, K. (2005). Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review, 112, 531–559. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J. (2002). Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 371–404. doi:10.1080/01690960143000254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, M., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (2011). Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject-verb agreement production. Cognition, 118, 377–397. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Huinck, W. J. (1999). Agrammatic production of subject-verb agreement: The effect of conceptual number. Brain and Language, 69(2), 119–160. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskell, T. R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Conflicting cues and competition in subject-verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 760–778. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00010-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskell, T. R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2005). Constituent structure and linear order in language production: Evidence from subject-verb agreement. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 31, 891–904. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, K. R., & Bock, K. (2005). Notional number agreement in English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 689–695. doi:10.3758/BF03196759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaan, E. (2002). Investigating the effects of distance and number interference in processing subject-verb dependencies: An ERP study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(2), 165–193. doi:10.1023/A:1014978917769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menenti, L., Gierhan, S. M., Segaert, K., & Hagoort, P. (2011). Shared language overlap and segregation of the neuronal infrastructure for speaking and listening revealed by functional MRI. Psychological Science, 22, 1173–1182. doi:10.1177/0956797611418347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppermann, F., Jescheniak, J. D., Schriefers, H., & Görges, F. (2009). Semantic relatedness among objects promotes the activation of multiple phonological codes during object naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(2), 356–370. doi:10.1080/17470210902952480
   Google Scholar
• Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., & Bock, K. (1999). Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 427–456. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 105–110. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249–284. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00027-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segaert, K., Menenti, L., Weber, K., Petersson, K. M., & Hagoort, P. (2012). Shared syntax in language production and language comprehension—An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1662–1670. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, E. S., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (2004). Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 49(1), 1–46. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2009). On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 308–327. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2010). Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction. Cognition, 114, 447–454. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Plausibility and grammatical agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 740–759. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00003-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooley, K., & Bock, J. K. (in press). On the parity of structural persistence in language production and comprehension. Cognition.
   Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Garrett, M. F. (1996). Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints. Cognition, 61, 261–298. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00713-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C. (1995). Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(2), 186–215. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Hartsuiker, R. J., Jarema, G., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1996). One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 407–442. doi:10.1080/016909696387169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 206–237. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar