Adaptive virtual power-based collision detection and isolation with link parameter estimation

References

• Caccavale F, Chiacchio P. Identification of dynamic parameters and feedforward control for a conventional industrial manipulator. Control Eng Pract. 1994;2(6):1039–1050. doi: 10.1016/0967-0661(94)91626-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Liu Y, Liu X, Peng Z. Parameter identification and vibration control in modular manipulators. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron. 2004;9(4):700–705. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2004.839035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddadin S, De Luca A, Albu-Schäffer A. Robot collisions: A survey on detection, isolation, and identification. IEEE Trans Robot. 2017 Dec;33(6):1292–312. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2017.2723903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minoura H. Collision avoidance using a virtual electric charge in the electrostatic potential field. In Proceedings of International Conference on Virtual Systems and MultiMedia; 1996. p. 289–294.
   Google Scholar
• Romann J. On-line collision avoidance for multi-robot systems: a new solution considering the robots' dynamics. In Proceedings of IEEE/SICE/RSJ International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems; 1996. p. 249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Khatib O. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. The Int J Robot Res. 1985;5(1):90–98. doi: 10.1177/027836498600500106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren CW. Global path planning using artificial potential fields. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 1989. p. 316–321.
   Google Scholar
• Xu W, Li C, Wang X, et al. Study on non-holonomic cartesian path planning of a free-floating space robotic system. Adv Robot. 2009;23(1–2):113–143. doi: 10.1163/156855308X392708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraichard T, Asama H. Inevitable collision states – a step towards safer robots. Adv Robot. 2004;18(10):1001–1024. doi: 10.1163/1568553042674662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo K, Kimura F. Collision avoidance using a free space enumeration method based on grid expansion. Adv Robot. 1988;3(3):159–175. doi: 10.1163/156855389X00073
   Google Scholar
• Lu S, Chung JH, Velinsky SA. Human–robot collision detection and identification based on wrist and base force/torque sensors. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2005. p. 3796–3801.
   Google Scholar
• Jamone L, Fumagalli M, Natale L, et al. Control of physical interaction through tactile and force sensing during visually guided reaching. IEEE International Conference on Symposium and Intelligent Control (ISIC); 2014. p. 1360–1365.
   Google Scholar
• Lu S, Chung JH. Collision detection enabled weighted path planning: a wrist and base force/torque sensors approach. In 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR); 2005. p. 165–170.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia A, Feliu V, Somolinos JA. Experimental testing of a gauge based collision detection mechanism for a new three degree-of-freedom flexible robot. J Robot Syst. 2003;20(6):271–284. doi: 10.1002/rob.10086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam TL, Yip HW, Qian H, et al. Collision avoidance of industrial robot arms using an invisible sensitive skin. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2012. p. 4542–4543.
   Google Scholar
• Lumelsky VJ, Cheung E. Real-time collision avoidance in teleoperated whole-sensitive robot arm manipulators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1993;23(1):194–203. doi: 10.1109/21.214777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takakura S, Murakami T, Ohnishi K. An approach to collision detection and recovery motion in industrial robot. In the 15th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society; 1989. p. 421–426.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca A, Mattone R. Actuator failure detection and isolation using generalized momenta. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2003. p. 634–639.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu Z, Ozawa R. A Sensorless Collision Detection Approach Based on Virtual Contact Points. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2018. p. 7639–7645.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu Z, Ozawa R, Ma S. A force-sensorless approach to collision detection based on virtual powers. Adv Robot. 2019;33(23):1209–1224. doi: 10.1080/01691864.2019.1686420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahrburg A, Morara E, Cesari G. Cartesian contact force estimation for robotic manipulators using Kalman filters and the generalized momentum. In IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE); 2015. p. 1230–1235.
   Google Scholar
• Cho CN, Kim JH, Kim YL, et al. Collision detection algorithm to distinguish between intended contact and unexpected collision. Adv Robot. 2012;26(16):1825–1840. doi: 10.1080/01691864.2012.685259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briquet-Kerestedjian N, Wahrburg A, Grossard MM, et al. Using neural networks for classifying human–robot contact situations. In 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC); 2019. p. 3279–3285.
   Google Scholar
• Golz S, Osendorfer C, Haddadin S. Using tactile sensation for learning contact knowledge: discriminate collision from physical interaction. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2015. p. 3788–3794.
   Google Scholar
• Kouris A, Dimeas F, Aspragathos N. Contact distinction in human-robot cooperation with admittance control. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC); 2016. p. 1951–1956.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon WE, Walker ID, Dawson DM, et al. Fault detection for robot manipulators with parametric uncertainty: a prediction-error-based approach. IEEE Trans Robot Auto. 2000;16(6):689–699. doi: 10.1109/70.897780
   Google Scholar
• Morinaga S, Kosuge K. Collision detection system for manipulator based on adaptive impedance control law. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2003. p. 1080–1085.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca A, Mattone R. An adapt-and-detect actuator FDI scheme for robot manipulators. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2004. p. 4975–4980.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada Y, Hirasawa Y, Huang S, et al. Human-robot contact in the safeguarding space. IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics; 1997. p. 230–236.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca A, Albu-Schäffer A, Haddadin S, et al. Collision detection and safe reaction with the DLR-III lightweight manipulator arm. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2006. p. 1623–1630.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca A, Ferrajoli L. Exploiting robot redundancy in collision detection and reaction. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2008. p. 3299–3305.
   Google Scholar
• Sciavicco L, Siciliano B. Modeling and control of robot manipulators. 2nd ed. London: Springer; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bittencourt AC, Gunnarsson S. Static friction in a robot joint – modeling and identification of load and temperature effects. ASME J Dyn Sys Measur Cont. 2012;134(5):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahrburg A, Klose S, Clever D, et al. Modeling speed-, load-, and position-dependent friction effects in strain wave gears. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2018. p. 2095–2102.
   Google Scholar
• Iskandar M, Wolf S. Dynamic friction model with thermal and load dependency: modeling, compensation, and external force estimation. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2019. p. 7367–7373.
   Google Scholar