Wooden window frames with structural sealants: manufacturing improvements and experimental validation of a finite element model

References

• Schmidt CM, Shoehnner WJ, Carbary LD, Takish MS. Performance properties of silicone structural adhesives. In: Parise CJ, editor. Science and technology of glazing systems. Philadelphia, PA; 1989. p. 22–45.
   Google Scholar
• Blandini L. Structural use of adhesive for the construction of frameless glass shells. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2006;26:499–504.
   Google Scholar
• de Buyl F. Silicone sealants and structural adhesives. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2001;21:411–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz P, Pequeno J. Structural timber-glass adhesive bonding. In: Veer N, editor. Challenging glass. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2008. p. 205–214.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson AR, Iglauer S. Adhesion of construction sealants to polymer foam backer rod used in building construction. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2006;26:555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Meijer M, Haemers S, Cobben W, Militz H. Surface Energy Determinations of Wood: Comparisonof Methodsand Wood Species. Langmuir. 2000;16:9352–9359.
   Google Scholar
• Iglauer S, Hutchinson AR, Lee TCP. Effect of foam backer rod on the mechanical performance of sealed joints. In: Wolf AT, editor. Durability of building and construction sealants and adhesives. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM STP; 2004. p. 184–205.
   Google Scholar
• Dasilva L, Das Neves P, Adams R, Spelt J. Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints – Part I: literature survey. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2009;29:319–330.
   Google Scholar
• Dasilva L, Das Neves P, Adams R, Wang A, Spelt J. Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints – Part II: comparative study. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2009;29:331–341.
   Google Scholar
• He X. A review of finite element analysis of adhesively bonded joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2011;31:248–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams RD, Wake WC. Structural adhesive joints in engineering. London: Elsevier Applied Science; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Adams RD, Comyn J, Wake WC. Structural adhesive joints in engineering. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Fitton M, Broughton J. Variable modulus adhesives: an approach to optimised joint performance. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2005;25:329–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagnetti D, Dragoni E. Standard finite element techniques for efficient stress analysis of adhesives joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2009;29:125–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Q, Tong L. Analytical solutions for non-linear analysis of composite single-lap adhesive joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2009;29:144–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charalambides MN, Olusanya A. The constitutive models suitable for adhesives in some finite element codes and suggested methods of generating the appropriate materials data. Teddington: UK National Physical Laboratory; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Dean G, Crocker L. The use of finite element methods for design with adhesives. Teddington: UK National Physical Laboratory; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Dean G, Crocker L, Read B, Wright L. Prediction of deformation and failure of rubber-toughened adhesives joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2004;24:295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzi A, Mittal KL. Handbook of adhesive technology. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Marcel Dekker; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gent AN. The role of chemical bonding in the adhesion of elastomers. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 1981;1:175–180.
   Google Scholar
• Custodio J, Broughton J, Cruz H. A review of factors influencing the durability of structural bonded timber joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2009;29:173–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Working Group 1 – wood adhesives [Internet]. In: Dunky M, Pizzi A, Leemput MV, editors. Report on the state of the art – wood adhesion and glued products, 1st ed. COST Action E13; 2002. Available from: http://users.teilar.gr/~mantanis/E13-Wood-Adhesion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marra AA. Technology of wood bonding – principles in practice. New York (NY): Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1992; 1: 161.
   Google Scholar
• Tascioglu C, Goodell B, Lopez-Anido R. Bond durability characterization of preservative treated wood and E-glass/phenolic composite interfaces. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003;63:979–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vick CB, Larsson PCh, Mahlberg RL, Simonson R, Rowell RM. Structural bonding of acetylated Scandinavian softwoods for exterior lumber laminates. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 1993;13:139–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira FG, da Silva LFM. Study of influence of substrate topography on stress distribution in structural adhesive joints. J. Adhes. 2011;87:671–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantaleo A, Ferri D, Roma D, Pellerano A. Structural silicone sealant modelling for wood frames: influence of adhesion on bonding strength. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2012;37:121–128.
   Google Scholar
• Werner H. Tragfähigkeit von Holz-Verbindungen mit stiftförmigen Verbindungsmitteln unter Berücksichtigung streuender Einflussgrößen [Load capacity of wooden dowell joints and influencing factors in mechanical resistance] [dissertation]. Karshrue: University of Karshrue; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen KW. Theory of timber connections. Int. Assoc. Bridge Struct. Eng. 1949;9:249–262.
   Google Scholar
• DIN EN 1995-1-1. Eurocode 5: Design and construction of timber structures – part 1-1: general information – general rules and rules for buildings. German version EN 1995-1-1:2004 + AC:2006 + A1:2008(EOTA; 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Sawata K, Yasumura M. Estimation of yield and ultimate strengths of bolted timber joints by nonlinear analysis and yield theory. J. Wood Sci. 2003;49:383–391.
   Google Scholar
• Awaludin A, Hirai T, Hayashikawa T, Sasaki Y. Load-carrying capacity of steel-to-timber joints with a pretensioned bolt. J. Wood Sci. 2008;54:362–368.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CJ, Lee TL, Jeng DS. Finite element modeling for the mechanical behavior of dowel-type timber joints. Comput. Struct. 2003;81:2731–2738.
   Google Scholar
• Daudeville L, Yasumura M. Failure analysis of timber bolted joints by fracture mechanics. Mater. Struct. 1996;29:418–425.
   Google Scholar
• Kharouf N, McClure G, Smith I. Elasto-plastic modeling of wood bolted connections. Comput. Struct. 2003;81:747–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resch E, Kaliske M. Numerical analysis and design of double-shear dowel-type connections of wood. Eng. Struct. 2012;41:234–241.
   Google Scholar
• Resch E, Kaliske M. Three-dimensional numerical analyses of load-bearing behavior and failure of multiple double-shear dowel-type connections in timber engineering. Comput. Struct. 2010;88:165–177.
   Google Scholar
• Xu BH, Taazount M, Bouchaïr A, Racher P. Numerical 3D finite element modelling and experimental tests for dowel-type timber joints. Constr. Build Mater. 2009;23:3043–3052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoumis G. Wood science and technology. Remagen-Oberwinter: Verlag Kessel;1991.
   Google Scholar
• Maico data sheets [July 2012]. Available from: http://www.maico.com/content.asp?L=1&IdMen=716
   Google Scholar