Ink-lift-off during offset printing: a novel mechanism behind ink–paper coating adhesion failure

References

• Kipphan H. Handbook of print media. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 112210.1007/978-3-540-29900-4.
   Google Scholar
• MacPhee J. An engineer’s analysis of the lithographic printing process. In: TAGA Proceedings. New York (NY): Technical Association of Graphic Arts Rochester; 1979. p. 237–277.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi Y, Fujita H, Sakata T. Ink transfer mechanism in offset printing process. In: TAGA Proceedings. New York (NY): Technical Association of Graphic Arts Rochester; 1983. p. 547–562.
   Google Scholar
• Myers RR, Miller JC, Zettlemoyer AC. The splitting of thin liquid films. Kinematics. J. Colloid Sci. 1959;14:287–299.10.1016/0095-8522(59)90053-4
   Google Scholar
• De Gâce YH, Dalphond JE, Mangin PJ. A mechanistic approach to ink transfer, Part III: properties of ink filament in printing nips. Adv. Print. Sci. Tech. 1992;21:312–327.
   Google Scholar
• MacPhee J. A unified view of the film splitting process, part I and II. American Ink Maker. 1997;75:42–49 and 1997;75:51–56, respectively.
   Google Scholar
• Micale FJ, Iwasa S, Lavelle J, Sunday S, Fetsko JM. The role of wetting in printing. In: TAGA Proceedings. New York (NY): Technical Association of Graphic Arts Rochester; 1989. p. 309–329.
   Google Scholar
• Adams RAC. The sorption of gum arabic from aqueous solution onto aluminium. Print. Tech. 1971;15:29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Riddell GL, Davies CW. A study of gum arabic, Part I. Viscosity and adsorption measurements. J. Phys. Chem. 1931;35:2722–2731.
   Google Scholar
• MacPhee J, Lind J. Measurement of ink film thicknesses printed by the litho process. In: TAGA Proceedings. New York (NY): Technical Association of Graphic Arts Rochester; 1991. p. 550–573.
   Google Scholar
• Chou SM. Viscosity measurement of viscoelastic inks at high shear rates. In: TAGA Proceedings. New York (NY): Technical Association of Graphic Arts Rochester; 1992. p. 388–408.
   Google Scholar
• Todd Ronald E. Printing inks, formulation principles, manufacture and quality control testing procedures. Pira printing guide series. Leatherhead: Pira International; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Chou SM, Fadner TA. Shear stability of fountain solution emulsified in lithographic inks. In: TAGA Proceedings. New York (NY): Technical Association of Graphic Arts Rochester; 1986. p. 37–62.
   Google Scholar
• Shen W, Hutton B, Liu F. A new understanding on the mechanism of fountain solution in the prevention of ink transfer to the non-image area in conventional offset lithography. J. Adhes. Sci. Tech. 2004;18:1861–1887.10.1163/1568561042708395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin RR. A model of the ‘liquid like’ layer between ice and a substrate with applications to wire regelation and particle migration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1979;68:235–251.10.1016/0021-9797(79)90277-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPhee J. Further insight into the lithographic process – with special emphasis on where the water goes. In: TAGA Proceedings. New York (NY): Technical Association of Graphic Arts Rochester; 1985. p. 269–297.
   Google Scholar
• Aspler J. Ink–water–paper interactions in printing: an updated review. In: Proceedings from the Tappi advanced coating fundamentals symposium. Turku: Tappi Press; 2006. p. 117–146.
   Google Scholar
• Plowman N. Predicting print mottle: A method of differentiating between three distinctively different types of mottle: backtrap mottle, water sensitive mottle and wet ink trapping mottle. In: Proceedings from Tappi Coating Conference; San Diego, CA; 1994. p. 211–228.
   Google Scholar
• Ström G, Madstedt S. Water induced irregularity of halftone dots and its impact on print mottle. In: Advances in printing and media technology, Proceedings of the 36th International Research Conference of IARIGAI held in Stockholm, Sweden; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lie C, Kolseth P. Aspects of water-induced mottle when printing on coated paper in sheet-fed lithographic offset. In: Advances in printing and media technology, Proceedings of the 34th International Research conference of iarigai; Grenoble, France; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Isoard JC. Ink transfer and retransfer – mottling and offset picking of coated papers. In: Proceedings from Tappi Coating Conference; San Francisco, CA; 1983. p. 143–153.
   Google Scholar
• Ozaki Y, Bousfield DW, Shaler SM. Characterization of coating layer structural and chemical uniformity for samples with backtrap mottle. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2008;23:008–013.10.3183/NPPRJ-2008-23-01-p008-013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala P, Koskinen T. Experimental and statistical investigation of drying effects on coated offset paper quality. TAPPI J. 2004;3:19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang Y, Bousfield DW, Coleman PS, Osgood A. The cause of backtrap mottle: chemical or physical? In: Proceedings from TAPPI Coating Conference. Atlanta, GA: TAPPI Press; 2000. p. 45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Bousfield DW, Van Heiningen A, Donigian D. Linkage between coating absorption uniformity and print mottle. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 2005;31:105–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang Y, Bousfield DW, Hassler J, Coleman P, Osgood A. Measurement of local variation of ink tack dynamics. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 1999;25:326–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engström G. Forming and consolidation of coating layers and their impact on coating and print – an overview. In: Proceedings from the Second International Papermaking & Environmental Conference. Book A; Tianjin; 2008. p. 84–102.
   Google Scholar
• Gane PAC, Seyler EN. Tack development: an analysis of ink/paper interaction in offset printing. In: Proceedings from the Tappi Coating Conference. Atlanta, GA: Tappi Press; 1994. p. 243–260.
   Google Scholar
• Kamal H, Ström G, Schoelkopf J, Gane PAC. Characterization of ink–paper coating adhesion failure: effect of pre-dampening of carbonate containing coatings. J Adhes. Sci Tech. 2010;24:449–469.10.1163/016942409X12561252292341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal Alm H, Ström G, Karlström K, Schoelkopf J, Gane PAC. Effect of excess dispersant on surface properties and liquid interactions on calcium carbonate containing coatings. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2010;25:220–230.
   Google Scholar
• Barros GG, Johansson P-Å. The optitopo technique for fast assessment of paper topography – limitations, applications and improvements. J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 2005;49:170–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson P, Johansson P-Å. A new method for the simultaneous measurement of surface topography and ink distribution on prints. Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 1999;14:315–319.10.3183/NPPRJ-1999-14-04-p315-319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson P-Å, Norman B. Methods for evaluating formation, print unevenness and gloss variations developed at STFI. In: Proceedings from TAPPI Process and Product Quality Control Conference, Cincinnati. Atlanta, GA: TAPPI Press; 1996. p. 139.
   Google Scholar
• Lidenmark C, Forsberg S, Norgren M, Edlund H, Karlsson O. Changes with aging in the surface hydrophobicity of coated paper. Tappi J. 2010;9:40–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Dettre RH. Wettability and contact angles. In: Matijevic E, editor. Surface and colloid science, Vol. 2. New York (NY): Wiley; 1969. p. 85–153.
   Google Scholar
• Kim LH, Pollock MJ, Wittbrodt EL, Roper JA, Iii, Smith DA, Stolarz JW, Rolf MJ, Green TJ, Langolf BJ. Reduction of back-trap mottle through optimization of the drying process for paper coatings. TAPPI J. 1998;81:153–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim LH, Wittbrodt EL, McCoy J, Langolf BJ, Pollack MJ, Roper JA, Stolarz JW, Rolf MJ. Characterization of coating paper surface morphology and its correlation to print mottle. In: Proceedings from Printing and Graphics Arts Conference; Québec City, CA; 1998. p. 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Arai T, Yamasaki T, Suzuki K, Ogura T, Sakai Y. The relationship between print mottle and coating structure. TAPPI J. 1988;71:47–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinga G, Helle T. Relationships between the coating surface structural variation and print quality. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 2003;29:179–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husband JC. Interactions between ground calcium carbonate pigments and polymer latices. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2000;15:382–386.10.3183/NPPRJ-2000-15-05-p382-386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgway CJ, Gane PAC. Effect of latex and pigment volume concentrations on suspension and consolidated particle packing and coating strength. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 2007;33:71–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunger GK. The influence of calendering on sheet and coating densification and on final printability. TAPPI J. 1967;50:372–379.
   Google Scholar
• Lepoutre P, Means G. Supercalendering and coating properties. TAPPI J. 1978;61:85–87.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen N, Jordan B, De Grâce J. Measurement of ink filament splitting patterns by image analysis. In: Proceedings from International Printing & Graphic Art Conference; Pittsburgh, PA; 1992. p. 81–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ercan SN, Bousfield DW. Influence of process parameters on filament size distribution. In: Proceedings from International Printing & Graphic Art Conference; Madison, WI; 1998. p. 111–115.
   Google Scholar
• Trollsås PO. Water uptake in newsprint during offset printing. TAPPI J. 1995;78:155–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ström G, Karathanasis M. Ink setting on coated media – Importance of pore structure and latex content. In: Proceeding from the Second International Papermaking & Environmental Conference, Book B; Tianjin; 2008. p. 894–900.
   Google Scholar