In vitro assessment of tooth color changes due to orthodontic treatment using knowledge discovery methods

References

• Sikri VK. Color: implications in dentistry. J. Conserv. Dent. 2010;13:249–255.10.4103/0972-0707.73381
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al Maaitah EF, Abu Omar AA, Al-Khateeb SN. Effect of fixed orthodontic appliances bonded with different etching techniques on tooth color: A prospective clinical study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Orthod. Constr. Soc. Am. Board Orthod. 2013;144:43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessment of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J. Dent. Res. 1989;68:1760–1764.10.1177/00220345890680120801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. 1. The three-dimensional nature of color. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1973;29:416–424.10.1016/S0022-3913(73)80019-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revised American Dental Association specification No. 12 for denture base polymer. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1975;90:451–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer JD, Wee A, Seghi R. Advances in color matching. Dent. Clin. North Am. 2004;48:341–358.10.1016/j.cden.2004.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Cal E, Guneri P, Kose T. Comparison of digital and spectrophotometric measurements of color shade guides. J. Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:221–228.10.1111/jor.2006.33.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen J. Precision shade technology: Contemporary strategies in shade selection. Pract. Proced. Aesthet Dent. 2002;14:79–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boksman L. Shade selection; accuracy and reproducibility. Ont. Dent. 2007;32:24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Revised American Dental Association specification No. 12 for denture base polymer. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1975;90:451–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner A. Tooth color: a review of the literature. J. Dent. 2004;32:3–12.10.1016/j.jdent.2003.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry DA, Geller W, Tric O, Anderson MJ, Tourville M, Kobashigawa A. Anatomical form defines color; function, form and aesthetics. Pract. Proced. Aesthet Dent. 2002;14:59–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fondriest J. Shade matching in restorative dentistry; the science and strategies. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23:467–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning WD, Contreras-Bulnes R, Brackett MG, Brackett WW. Color differences: polymerized composite and corresponding Vitapan Classical shade tab. J. Dent. 2009;37:e34–39.10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Ghinea R, Pérez MM, Herrera LJ, Rivas MJ, Yebra A, Paravina RD. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. J. Dent. 2010;38:e57–64.10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim ST. The effects of Ledermix paste on discolouration of mature teeth. Int. Endodontic J. 2000;5:227–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrea D, Nedevschi S, Lupsor M, Socaciu M, Badea R. Experimenting various classification techniques for improving the automatic diagnosis of the malignant liver tumors, based on ultrasound images. 3rd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing; Romania; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrea D, Nedevschi S, Badea R. The role of the superior order GLCM and of the generalized cooccurrence matrices in the characterization and automatic diagnosis of the hepatocellular carcinoma, based on ultrasound images. IEEE 7th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing; Romania; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrea D. Texture-based methods and dimensionality reduction techniques involved in the detection of the inflammatory bowel diseases from ultrasound images. IFMBE Proceedings; Romania; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrea D. Classification of the hepatocellular carcinoma in ultrasound images based on the imagistic textural model of this tumor. IFMBE Proceedings; Romania; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hujun Y. Advances in adaptive nonlinear manifolds and dimensionality reduction. Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China; China; 03/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrea D. Abdominal tumor characterization and recognition using superior-order cooccurrence matrices, based on ultrasound images. In: Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mojsilovic A, Popovic M, Markovic S, Krstic C. Characterization of visually similar diffuse diseases from B-scan liver images using nonseparable wavelet transform. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 1998;17:541–549.10.1109/42.730399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sujana H, Swarnamani S. Application of Artificial Neural Networks for the classification of liver lesions by texture parameters. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1996;22:1177–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chikui T, Tokumori K, Yoshiura K, Sonographic texture characterization of salivary gland tumors by fractal analysis, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2005;31:1297–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minuillon, A, Tate R. Classifier combination for in vivo magnetic resonance spectra of brain tumors. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2002;2364:282–292.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X. Multi-class feature selection for texture classification. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2006;27:1685–1691.10.1016/j.patrec.2006.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabczewski K, Jankowski N. Feature selection with decision tree criterion. Proc. IEEE Fifth Int. Conf. Hybrid Intell. Syst. 2005;212–217.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinan JS. Feature selection and classification in the diagnosis of cervical cancer. 1999. Available from: http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/j.s.hallinan/pubs/Handbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karegowda A, Manjunath A, Jayaram MA. Application of Genetic algorithm optimized neural network connection weights for medical diagnosis of Pima indian diabetes. Int. J. Soft Comput. 2011;2:15–23.10.5121/ijsc
   Google Scholar
• Zeng H, Cheung H. Feature selection and kernel learning for local learning-based clustering. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2011;33:1532–1547.10.1109/TPAMI.2010.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh V, Nagpal S. A guided clustering technique for knowledge discovery – a case study of liver disorder dataset. Int. J. Comput. Bus. Res. 2013;4: Available from: http://www.researchmanuscripts.com/PapersVol1N1/IJCBR-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Markey MK, Lo JY. Self-organizing map for cluster analysis of a breast cancer database. Artif. Intell. Med. 2003;27:113–127.10.1016/S0933-3657(03)00003-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttreshwar GS. Hepatitis B diagnosis using logical inference and self-organizing map. J. Comput. Sci. 2008;4:1042–1050.
   Google Scholar
• Hall M. Benchmarking attribute selection techniques for discrete class data mining. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2003;15:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toennies KD. Guide to medical image analysis. Methods and algorithms. London: Springer Verlag; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Weka 3, Data Mining Software in Java. 2013. Available from: http://www.cswaikato.ac.nzhttp://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/index.html
   Google Scholar
• SOM 2.0 toolbox for Matlab. 2005. Available from: http://www.cis.hut.fi/somtoolbox/
   Google Scholar
• Yin H. The self-organizing maps: background, theories, extensions and applications. Comput. Intell. 2008;115:715–762.
   Google Scholar