Finite element analysis on the optimal material choice and cavity design parameters for MOD inlays exposed to different force vectors and magnitudes

References

• Fron Chabouis H, Smail Faugeron V, Attal JP. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2013;29:1209–1218.10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YR, Du W, Zhou XD, et al. Review of research on the mechanical properties of the human tooth. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2014;6:61–69.10.1038/ijos.2014.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahyazadehfar M, Ivancik J, Majd H, et al. On the mechanics of fatigue and fracture in teeth. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2014;66:0308031–3080319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei SMM, Heidarifar H, Arezodar FF, et al. Influence of connector width on the stress distribution of posterior bridges under loading. J. Dent. 2011;8:67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hamza TA, Ezzat HA, El-Hossary MM, et al. Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems. J. Prosthetic Dent. 2013;109:83–87.10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60020-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübsch PF, Middleton J, Knox J. A finite element analysis of the stress at the restoration tooth interface comparing inlays and bulk fillings. Biomaterials. 2000;21:1015–1019.10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00266-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Romanowicz M. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion. J. Prosthetic Dent. 2007;98:89–100.10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60042-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holberg C, Rudzki-Janson I, Wichelhaus A, et al. Ceramic inlays: is the inlay thickness an important factor influencing the fracture risk? J. Dent. 2013;41:628–635.10.1016/j.jdent.2013.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaruba M, Kasper R, Kazama R, et al. Marginal adaptation of ceramic and composite inlays in minimally invasive mod cavities. Clin. Oral Invest. 2014;18:579–587.10.1007/s00784-013-0988-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. The effect of postcuring on quantity of remaining double bonds, mechanical properties, and in vitro wear of two resin composites. J. Dent. 2000;28:447–452.10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00021-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN, et al. Novel-design ultra-thin CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic occlusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental erosion. J. Prosthetic Dent. 2011;105:217–226.10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60035-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J. Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:641–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Guess PC, Zhang Y. Load-bearing properties of minimal-invasive monolithic lithium disilicate and zirconia occlusal onlays: finite element and theoretical analyses. Dental Mater. 2013;29:742–751.10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer BD, Geurtsen W. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites. Am J Dent. 2001;14:216–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Fok A, Li H. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration. Dental Mater. 2014;30:327–333.10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Fok ASL, Qualtrough A. A two stage shape optimization process for cavity preparation. Dent. Mater. 2008;24:1444–1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamanel K, ÇAGLAR A, Gülsahi K, et al. Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis. Dent. Mater. J. 2009;28:661–670.10.4012/dmj.28.661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos RE, Soares CJ, Quagliatto PS, et al. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis. J. Prosthodontics. 2011;20:447–455.10.1111/jopr.2011.20.issue-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borcic J, Braut A. Finite element analysis in dental medicine, finite element analysis – new trends and developments. In: Farzad E, editor. InTech; 2012. P. 3–20. ISBN: 978-953-51-0769-9
   Google Scholar
• Field C, Li Q, Li W, et al. A comparative mechanical and bone remodelling study of all ceramic posterior inlay and onlay fixed partial dentures. J. Dent. 2012;40:48–56.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne P, Stanley K, Schlichting LH. Modeling of ultrathin occlusal veneers. Dent. Mater. 2012;28:777–782.10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holberg C, Winterhalder P, Wichelhaus A, et al. Fracture risk of lithium-disilicate ceramic inlays: a finite element analysis. Dent. Mater. 2013;29:1244–1250.10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun K, Choi H, Lee J. Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth. J. Dent. Biomech. 2014;5:1758736014520809.
   Google Scholar
• Ausiello P, Rengo S, Davidson CL, et al. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Dent. Mater. 2004;20:862–872.10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. J. Prosthetic Dent. 2008;99:131–140.10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60029-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Bo H, Yongchun G, et al. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three dimensional finite element analysis. J. Prosthetic Dent. 2010;103:6–12.10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60206-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne P, Belser UC. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23:543–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah JW, Dennison JB, Powers JM. Effects of design on stress distribution of intracoronal gold restorations. J. Am Dent. Assoc. 1977;94:1151–1154.10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manhart J, Mehl A, Obermeier T, et al. Finite element study on stress distribution in dependence on cavity width and materials properties. In: Academy of dental materials: proceedings of conference on clinically appropriate alternatives to amalgam: biophysical factors in restorative decision-making. Vol. 9. 1996 Oct 30–Nov 2; Munich, Germany. p. 269.
   Google Scholar
• Khera SC, Goel VK, Chen RC, et al. Parameters of MOD cavity preparations: a 3-D FEM study, Part 2. Oper. Dent. 1991;16:42–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeed SA, Fok SL, Wilson NH. A comparison of 2D and 3D finite element analysis of a restored tooth. J. Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:209–215.10.1111/jor.2006.33.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrentino R, Aversa R, Ferro V, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strain and stress distributions in endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with diferent post, core and crown materials. Dent. Mater. 2007;23:983–993.10.1016/j.dental.2006.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Lluch C, Rodríguez-Cervantes PJ, Sancho-Bru JL, et al. Influence of material and diameter of pre-fabricated posts on maxillary central incisors restored with crown. J. Oral Rehabil. 2009;36:737–747.10.1111/jor.2009.36.issue-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Gonzalez A, Iserte-Vilar JL, Gonzalez-Lluch C. Biomed. Eng. [cited 2012 Mar 10]. Available from: http://www.biomedical-engineering-online.com/content/10/1/44
   Google Scholar
• Craig R, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials. St Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Lang L, Wang RF. Validation of finite element analysis in dental ceramics research. J. Prosthetic Dent. 2001;86:650–654.10.1067/mpr.2001.120839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos MBF, Silva Neto JP, Consani RLX, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in peri-implant bone with relined dentures and different heights of healing caps. J. Oral Rehabil. 2011;38:691–696.10.1111/jor.2011.38.issue-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, et al. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J. Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:18–22.10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01179.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinogaya T, Bakke M, Thomsen CE, et al. Bite force and occlusal load in healthy young subjects – a methodological study. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 2000;8:11–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shinogaya T, Bakke M, Thomsen CE, et al. Effects of ethnicity, gender and age on clenching force and load distribution. Clin. Oral Invest. 2001;5:63–68.10.1007/s007840000099
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricardo J. Influence of the remaining coronal structure on the resistance of teeth with intraradicular retainer. Braz. Dent. J. 2005;16:197–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aggarwal S, Garg V. Finite element analysis of stress concentration in three popular brands of fiber posts systems used for maxillary central incisor teeth. J. Conserv. Dent. 2011;14:293–296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee MR, Cho BH, Son HH, et al. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Dent. Mater. 2007;23:288–295.10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne P. Composite resins and bonded porcelain: the postamalgam era? J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2006;34:135–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper. Dent. 2004;29:481–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindl A, Mormann WH. Survival rate of mono-ceramic and ceramic-core CAD/CAM-generated anterior crowns over 2–5 years. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2004;112:197–204.10.1111/eos.2004.112.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne P, Belser U. Understanding the intact tooth and the biomimetic principle. In: Magne P, Belser U, editors. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition: a biomimetic approach. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 2002. p. 23–55.
   Google Scholar
• Leinfelder KF. Indirect posterior composite resins. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2005;26:495–503.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magne P, Perakis N, Belser UC, et al. Stress distribution of inlay-anchored adhesive fixed partial dentures: a finite element analysis of the influence of restorative materials and abutment preparation design. J. Prosthetic Dent. 2002;87:516–528.10.1067/mpr.2002.124367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Lu Y, Yang BS, et al. The finite element analysis of stress distrubution in different size of MO cavities restored with composite resin inlays. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2015;24:170–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar