Effect of material and fabrication technique on marginal fit and fracture resistance of adhesively luted inlays made of CAD/CAM ceramics and hybrid materials

References

• Fron Chabouis H, Smail Faugeron V, Attal JP. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review. Dent. Mater. 2013;29:1209–1218.10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamza TA, Ezzat HA, El-Hossary MM, et al. Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2013;109:83–87.10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60020-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. The effect of postcuring on quantity of remaining double bonds, mechanical properties, and in vitro wear of two resin composites. J. Dent. 2000;28:447–452.10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00021-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinfelder KF. Indirect posterior composite resins. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2005;26:495–503.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batalha-Silva S, de Andrada MA, Maia HP, et al. Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of large MOD composite resin restorations: direct versus CAD/CAM inlays. Dent. Mater. 2013;29:324–331.10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, et al. Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J. Dent. 1992;20:171–177.10.1016/0300-5712(92)90132-V
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Interface dimensions of CEREC-2 MOD inlays. Dent. Mater. 2000;16:68–74.10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00089-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess PC, Vagkopoulou T, Zhang Y, et al. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue. J. Dent. 2014;42:199–209.10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift EJ, et al. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J. Prosthodont. 2003;89:551–557.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Fok A, Li H. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration. Dent. Mater. 2014;30:327–333.10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer BD, Geurtsen W. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites. Am. J. Dent. 2001;14:216–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, et al. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. J. Prosthodont. 2013;22:419–428.10.1111/jopr.2013.22.issue-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ortega VL, Pegoraro LF, Conti PCR. Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars, restored with ceromer or heat-pressed ceramic inlays and fixed with dual-resin cements. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2004;31:393–397.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01239.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubas GB, Habekost L, Camacho GB, et al. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with inlay and onlay ceramic restorations and luted with two different agents. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2011;55:53–59.10.1016/j.jpor.2010.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshvad A, Hooshmand T, Asefzadeh F, et al. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by Cerec in lab and hot-pressed techniques. J. Prosthodont. 2011;20:535–540.10.1111/jopr.2011.20.issue-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fonseca RB, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Correr-Sobrinho L, et al. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2007;98:277–284.10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60101-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares CJ, Martins LR, Fonseca RB, et al. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2006;95:421–429.10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Watts DC. The effect of cavity wall taper on fracture resistance of teeth restored with resin composite inlays. Oper. Dent. 1993;18:230–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitmongkolsuk S, Heydecke G, Stappert C, et al. Fracture strength of all-ceramic lithium disilicate and porcelain fused-to-metal bridges for molar replacement after dynamic loading. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 2002;10:15–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yıldız C, Vanlıoglu BA, Evren B, et al. Fracture resistance of manually and CAD/CAM manufactured ceramic onlays. J. Prosthodont. 2013;22:537–542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White SN, Yu Z, Tom JF, et al. In vivo marginal adaptation of cast crowns luted with different cements. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1995;74:25–32.10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80224-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mously HA, Finkelman M, Zandparsa R, et al. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2014;112:249–256.10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soriani NC, Leal MB, Paulino SM, et al. Effect of the use of die spacer on the marginal fit of copings cast in NiCr, NiCrBe and commercially pure titanium. Braz. Dent. J. 2007;18:225–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fathi HM, Al-Masoody AH, El-Ghezawi N, et al. The accuracy of fit of crowns made from wax patterns produced conventionally (hand formed) and via CAD/CAM technology. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 2016;24:10–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federlin M, Schmidt S, Hiller KA, et al. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation. Oper. Dent. 2004;29:560–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stappert CFJ, Chitmongkolsuk S, Silva NRFA, et al. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials. Dent. Mater. 2008;24:1248–1257.10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br. Dent. J. 1971;131:107–111.10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent. Mater. 1996;12:245–249.10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80030-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, et al. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS empress, and Procera crowns. Int. J. Prosthodont. 1997;10:478–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent. Mater. 1993;9:2–5.10.1016/0109-5641(93)90095-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, et al. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dent. Mater. 2012;28:320–326.10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stappert CF, Abe P, Kurths V, et al. Masticatory fatigue, fracture resistance, and marginal discrepancy of ceramic partial crowns with and without coverage of compromised cusps. J. Adhes. Dent. 2008;10:41–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stappert CF, Denner N, Gerds T, et al. Marginal adaptation of different types of all-ceramic partial coverage restorations after exposure to an artificial mouth. Br. Dent. J. 2005;199:779–783.10.1038/sj.bdj.4813036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, et al. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent. Mater. 2003;19:575–583.10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00107-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrati S, Mahboub F. Marginal adaptation of indirect composite, glass-ceramic inlays and direct composite: an in vitro evaluation. J. Dent. (Tehran). 2010;7:77–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hahn P, Attin T, Gröfke M, et al. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent. Mater. 2001;17:191–196.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00067-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemalmaz D, Kükrer D. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal fit of class II ceromer inlays. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2006;33:436–442.10.1111/jor.2006.33.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peutzfeldt A. Effect of the ultrasonic insertion technique on the seating of composite inlays. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1994;52:51–54.10.3109/00016359409096376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjögren G, Hedlund SO. Filler content and gap width after luting of ceramic inlays, using the ultrasonic insertion technique and composite resin cements. An in vitro study. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1997;55:403–407.10.3109/00016359709059207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krifka S, Stangl M, Wiesbauer S, et al. Influence of different cusp coverage methods for the extension of ceramic inlays on marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro. Clin. Oral. Invest. 2009;13:333–341.10.1007/s00784-008-0239-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saridag S, Sevimay M, Pekkan G. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study. Oper. Dent. 2013;38:626–634.10.2341/12-211-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne P, Schlichting LH, Maia HP, et al. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2010;104:149–157.10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60111-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaverry A, Borges GA, Mota EG, et al. Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays. J. Adhes. Dent. 2013;15:561–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, et al. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2004;31:18–22.10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01179.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonucci JM, O’Donnell JNR, Schumacher GE, et al. Amorphous calcium phosphate composites and their effect on composite–adhesive–dentin bonding. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2009;23:1133–1147.10.1163/156856109X432767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Koç-Dündar B. Composite–composite adhesion in dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2014;28:2209–2229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: a literature review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1990;63:619–626.10.1016/0022-3913(90)90316-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer O, Kuepper H, Thompson GA, et al. Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study. Dent. Mater. 2013;29:851–858.10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalpino PH, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A, et al. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Am. J. Dent. 2002;15:389–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunton PA, Cattell P, Burke FJ, et al. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1999;82:167–171.10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70151-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1999;81:652–661.10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70103-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziskind D, Gleitman J, Rotstein I, et al. Evaluation of cetylpyridinium chloride for infection control in storage solution. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2003;30:477–481.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01091.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun G, Sener Y, Sengun A. Effect of storage duration/solution on microshear bond strength of composite to enamel. Dent. Mater. J. 2007;26:116–121.10.4012/dmj.26.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar