Immediate and delayed repair bond strength of a new ormocer resin restorative material as a function of mechanical and chemical surface conditioning methods

References

• Rinastiti M, Özcan M, Siswomihardjo W, et al. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. J. Dent. 2010;38:29–38.10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer NB, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J. Dent. Res. 2011;90:402–416.10.1177/0022034510381263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra S, Singh A, Gupta M, et al. Ormocer: an aesthetic direct restorative material; an in vitro study comparing the marginal sealing ability of organically modified ceramics and a hybrid composite using an ormocer-based bonding agent and a conventional fifth-generation bonding agent. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2012;3:48–53.10.4103/0976-237X.94546
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tezvergil A, Lassila L, Vallittu P. Composite–composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J. Dent. 2003;31:521–525.10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00093-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcante LM, Schneider LF, Silikas N, et al. Surface integrity of solvent-challenged ormocer-matrix composite. Dent. Mater. 2011;27:173–179.10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awad D, Ilie N. Effect of polymerisation and ageing on the incremental bond strength of ormocer-based dental materials. Clin. Oral Invest. 2013;17:1339–1347.10.1007/s00784-012-0831-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations–criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent. Mater. 2012;29:28–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashi TS, Erfan M, Rakhshan V, et al. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Oper. Dent. 2011;36:608–617.10.2341/10-386-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baur V, Ilie N. Repair of dental resin-based composites. Clin. Oral Invest. 2013;17:601–608.10.1007/s00784-012-0722-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni E, Ferrari M, Papacchini F, et al. Influence of ozone application on the repair strength of silorane-based and ormocer-based composites. Am. J. Dent. 2010;23:260–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch CD, Hayashi H, Seow LL, et al. The management of defective resin composite restorations: current trends in dental school teaching in Japan. J. Oral Rehabil. 2013;38:497–504.
   Google Scholar
• Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Blaser PK, et al. A long-term evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of resin-based composite restorations. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2009;140:1476–1484.10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ahdal K, Silikas N, Watts DC. Development of viscoelastic stability of resin-composites incorporating novel matrices. Dent. Mater. 2015;31:1561–1566.10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud SH, El-Embaby AE, Abdallah AM, et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer, nanohybrid and nanofill composite restorative systems in posterior teeth. J. Adhes. Dent. 2008;4:315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Civelek A, Ersoy M, L’Hotelier E, et al. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites. Oper. Dent. 2003;28:635–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Pekkan G. Effect of different adhesion strategies on bond strength of resin composite to composite-dentin complex. Oper. Dent. 2013;38:63–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Askary FS, Fawzy AS, Abd Elmohsen HM. Tensile bond strength of immediately repaired anterior microfine hybrid restorative composite using nontrimmed hourglass specimens. J. Adhes. Dent. 2009;11:41–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Askary FS, El-Banna AH, van Noort R. Immediate vs delayed repair bond strength of a nanohybrid resin composite. J. Adhes. Dent. 2012;14:265–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, et al. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J. Dent. 2012;40:513–521.10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa TR, Ferreira SQ, Klein-Júnior CA, et al. Durability of surface treatments and intermediate agents used for repair of a polished composite. Oper. Dent. 2010;35:231–237.10.2341/09-216-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper. Dent. 1993;18:187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiba K, Hosoda H, Fusayama T. The addition of an adhesive composite resin to the same material: bond strength and clinical techniques. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1989;61:669–675.10.1016/S0022-3913(89)80039-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffier-Boutry D, Place E, Devaux J, et al. Interfacial layer characterization in dental composite. J. Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:74–77.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01008.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinastiti M, Özcan M, Siswomihardjo W, et al. Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins. Clin. Oral Invest. 2011;15:625–633.10.1007/s00784-010-0426-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Barbosa S, Melo R, et al. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent. Mater. 2007;23:1276–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’Oca S, Papacchini F, Goracci C, et al. Effect of oxygen inhibition on composite repair strength over time. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater. 2007;81B:493–498.10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis G, Johanson W, Martin W, et al. Shear bond strength of immediately repaired ligh-cured composite resin restorations. Oper. Dent. 1998;23:121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliades G, Caputo A. The strength of layering technique in visible light-cured composites. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1989;61:31–38.10.1016/0022-3913(89)90104-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannig C, Laubach S, Hahn P, et al. Shear bond strength of repaired adhesive filling materials using different repair procedures. J. Adhes. Dent. 2006;8:35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacchini P, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi N, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of microfilled hybrid composite: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J. Adhes. Dent. 2007;9:25–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3757–3785.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Jin J. Effect of silane coupling agent on interphase and performance of glass fibers/unsaturated polyester composites. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2001;242:174–179.10.1006/jcis.2001.7788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Matinlinna J, Vallittu P, et al. Effect of drying time of 3-mathacryloxypropyltrimethoxy silane on the shear bond strength of a composite resin to silica-coated base/noble alloys. Dent. Mater. 2004;20:586–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Stawarczyk B. Efficiency of different repair kits on bonding to aged dental resin composite substrates. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2015;58:7–12.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Askary FS, Nassif MS, Fawzy AS. Shear bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin: effect of smear layer thickness and different dentin conditioners. J. Adhes. Dent. 2008;10:471–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azarbal P, Boyer D, Chan K. The effect of bonding agents on the interfacial bond strength of repaire composites. Dent. Mater. 1986;2:135–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashi TS, Erfan M, Rakhshan V, et al. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Oper. Dent. 2011;36:608–617.10.2341/10-386-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J. Dent. 1998;26:685–694.10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00044-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite–composite repair bond strength. Clin. Oral Invest. 2009;13:317–323.10.1007/s00784-008-0228-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J. Dent. 2008;36:969–976.10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar