Adhesive bond strength and compressive strength of a novel bulk fill composite with zirconia nano-hybrid filler

References

• Malhotra N, Mala K, Acharya S. Resin-based composite as a direct esthetic restorative material. Compend. Contin. Edu. Dent. 2011;32:14–23; quiz 4, 38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bahramian N, Atai M, Naimi-Jamal MR. Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene fiber reinforced dental composites: effect of fiber surface treatment on mechanical properties of the composites. Dent. Mater. 2015;31:1022–1029.10.1016/j.dental.2015.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiari MD, Rodrigues MC, Xavier TA, et al. Mechanical properties and ion release from bioactive restorative composites containing glass fillers and calcium phosphate nano-structured particles. Dent. Mater. 2015;31:726–733.10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Irie M, et al. Flexural properties of polyethylene, glass and carbon fiber-reinforced resin composites for prosthetic frameworks. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2015;73:581–587.10.3109/00016357.2014.958875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scribante A, Massironi S, Pieraccini G, et al. Effects of nanofillers on mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composites polymerized with light-curing and additional postcuring. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2015;13:e296–e299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Zhang M, Liu F, et al. Investigation on the physical–mechanical properties of dental resin composites reinforced with novel bimodal silica nanostructures. Mat. Sci. Eng.: C. 2015;50:266–273.10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirouche-Korichi A, Mouzali M, Watts DC. Effects of monomer ratios and highly radiopaque fillers on degree of conversion and shrinkage-strain of dental resin composites. Dent. Mater. 2009;25:1411–1418.10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan DC, Titus HW, Chung KH, et al. Radiopacity of tantalum oxide nanoparticle filled resins. Dent. Mater. 1999;15:219–222.10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00039-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijken JW, Wing KR, Ruyter IE. An evaluation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials used in Class I and Class II cavities. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1989;47:401–407.10.3109/00016358909004809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallav P, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL, et al. The influence of admixing microfiller to small-particle composite resin on wear, tensile strength, hardness, and surface roughness. J. Dent. Res. 1989;68:489–490.10.1177/00220345890680031101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambire UV, Tripathi VK. Influence of zirconia nanoclusters on the compressive stregth of BIS-GMA and TEGDMA based dental composites. J. Eng. App. Sci. 2012;7:1196–1201.
   Google Scholar
• Deng C, Weng J, Duan K, et al. Preparation and mechanical property of poly(ε-caprolactone)–matrix composites containing nano-apatite fillers modified by silane coupling agents. J. Mat. Sci.: Mater. Med. 2010;21:3059–3064.10.1007/s10856-010-4158-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo G, Fan Y, Zhang JF, et al. Novel dental composites reinforced with zirconia-silica ceramic nanofibers. Dent. Mater. 2012;28:360–368.10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcanti AN, Foxton RM, Watson TF, et al. Y-TZP ceramics: key concepts for clinical application. Oper. Dent. 2009;34:344–351.10.2341/08-79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson NC, Burgess JO. Dental ceramics: a current review. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2014;35:161–166; quiz 8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJ, et al. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: characterizing discrete filler particles and agglomerates using a micromanipulation technique. Dent. Mater. 2009;25:180–187.10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combe EC, Shaglouf AM, Watts DC, et al. Mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials. Dent. Mater. 1999;15:158–165.10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00027-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke ES. Advances in restorative core materials. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2000;21:976–978.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Goracci C, et al. Bond strength performance of different resin composites used as core materials around fiber posts. Dent. Mater. 2007;23:95–99.10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikemura K, Tay FR, Kouro Y, et al. Optimizing filler content in an adhesive system containing pre-reacted glass-ionomer fillers. Dent. Mater. 2003;19:137–146.10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00022-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittem J, Sajjan GS, Varma KM. Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain). J. Conserv. Dent. 2015;18:369–373.10.4103/0972-0707.164034
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trinta CC, de Carvalho RCC, de Moura Leite SA, et al. Effect of substrate and adhesive system type on composite resin restorations. RSBO. 2013;10:306–312.
   Google Scholar
• Anusavice KJ. Phillips: science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis, (MO): WB Saunders; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Banava SSS. In vitro comparative study of compressive strength of different types of composite resins in different periods of time. Iran. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008;4:69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Guess PC, Att W, Strub JR. Zirconia in fixed implant prosthodontics. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2012;14:633–645.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00317.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutayas SO, Vagkopoulou T, Pelekanos S, et al. Zirconia in dentistry: part 2. Evidence-based clinical breakthrough. Eur. J. Esthet. Dent. 2009;4:348–380.
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, et al. Current status of zirconia restoration. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2013;57:236–261.10.1016/j.jpor.2013.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raut A, Rao PL, Ravindranath T. Zirconium for esthetic rehabilitation: an overview. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2011;22:140–143.10.4103/0970-9290.79979
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Condon JR, et al. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. Dent. Mater. 2002;18:1–11.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00103-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikejima I, Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation. Dent. Mater. 2003;19:206–211.10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00031-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2002;87:642–649.10.1067/mpr.2002.125179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J-YZQ, Emrick T, Crosby A. Nanoparticle alignment and repulsion during failure of glassy polymer nanocomposites. Macromol. 2006;39:7392–7396.10.1021/ma061210k
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah DMP, Jiang DD, Batt CA, et al. Effect of nanoparticle mobility on toughness of polymer nanocomposites. Adv. Mater. 2005;17:525–528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, et al. Meta-analytical review of parameters involved in dentin bonding. J. Dent. Res. 2012;91:351–357.10.1177/0022034511431251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair L, Padipatvuthikul P. Variables related to materials and preparing for bond strength testing irrespective of the test protocol. Dent. Mater. 2010;26:e17–e23.10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuja N, Nagpal R, Pandit IK. Dental adhesion: mechanism, techniques and durability. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2012;36:223–234.10.17796/jcpd.36.3.68805rl1r037m063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milia E, Cumbo E, Cardoso RJ, et al. Current dental adhesives systems. A narrative review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2012;18:5542–5552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer P, Jonggu Park QY, Misra A, et al. Durable bonds at the adhesive/dentin interface: an impossible mission or simply a moving target? Braz. Dent. Sci. 2012;15:4–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanajasan PP, Dhakshinamoorthy M, Rao CS. Factors affecting the bond strength of self-etch adhesives: a meta-analysis of literature. J. Conserv. Dent. 2011;14:62–67.10.4103/0972-0707.80746
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang HS, Noh YS, Lee Y, et al. Push-out bond strengths of fiber-reinforced composite posts with various resin cements according to the root level. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2013;5:278–286.10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain G, Narad A, Boruah LC, et al. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three resin based dual-cure core build-up materials: an In-vitro study. J. Conserv. Dent. 2015;18:337–341.10.4103/0972-0707.159754
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003;89:268–274.10.1067/mpr.2003.50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent. Mater. 2012;28:467–477.10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, et al. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J. Dent. Res. 1984;63:1248–1254.10.1177/00220345840630101701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calais JG, Soderholm KJ. Influence of filler type and water exposure on flexural strength of experimental composite resins. J. Dent. Res. 1988;67:836–840.10.1177/00220345880670050801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JD, Kei Lung CY, Tsoi JK, et al. Effects of a zirconate coupling agent incorporated into an experimental resin composite on its compressive strength and bonding to zirconia. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2014;29:171–176.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nihei T, Dabanoglu A, Teranaka T, et al. Three-body-wear resistance of the experimental composites containing filler treated with hydrophobic silane coupling agents. Dent. Mater. 2008;24:760–764.10.1016/j.dental.2007.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabela MM, Sideridou ID. Effect of the structure of silane coupling agent on sorption characteristics of solvents by dental resin-nanocomposites. Dent. Mater. 2008;24:1631–1639.10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moura SK, Santos JF, Ballester RY. Morphological characterization of the tooth/adhesive interface. Braz. Dent. J. 2006;17:179–185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Souza-Zaroni WC, Seixas LC, Ciccone-Nogueira JC, et al. Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin. Braz. Dent. J. 2007;18:124–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Can Say E, Nakajima M, Senawongse P, et al. Microtensile bond strength of a filled vs. unfilled adhesive to dentin using self-etch and total-etch technique. J. Dent. 2006;34:283–291.10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, et al. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent. Mater. 2005;21:864–881.10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent. Mater. 2008;24:915–922.10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent. Mater. 2010;26:e78–e93.10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, et al. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of ‘macro’ test methods. Dent. Mater. 2010;26:e38–e49.10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar