Microleakage in class V cavities prepared using conventional method versus Er:YAG laser restored with glass ionomer cement or resin composite

References

• Makishi P, Thitthaweerat S, Sadr A, et al. Assesment of current adhesives in class I cavity: non destructive imaging using optical coherence tomography and microtenisle bond strength. Dent. Mater. 2015;31:e190–e200.10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokstad A Secondary caries and microleakage. Dent. Mater. 2015 Epub.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francisconi LF, Scaffa PM, de Barros VR, et al. Glass ionomer cements and their role in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. J. Appl. Oral. Sci. 2009;17:364–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinakaran S. Evaluation of the effect of different food media on the marginal integrity of class V compomer, conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations: an in vitro study. J. Int. Oral. Health. 2015;7:53–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuper NK, van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ. Restoration materials and secondary caries using an in vitro biofilm model. J. Dent. Res. 2015;94:62–68.10.1177/0022034514553245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corona SA, Borsatto M, Dibb RG, et al. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation. Oper. Dent. 2001;26:491–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer RA, Charlton DG, Hermesch CB. Repairability of three resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Oper. Dent. 1998;23:168–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of surface treatment on the bond strength of glass ionomer to enamel. Dent. Mater. 2002;18:454–462.10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00068-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmé KI, Deman PJ, De Bruyne MA, et al. Microleakage of four different restorative glass ionomer formulations in class V cavities: Er:YAG laser vs. conventional preparation. Photomed. Laser. Surg. 2008;26:541–549.10.1089/pho.2007.2227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammed G, Dayem R. Evaluation of the microleakage of different class V cavities prepared by using Er:YAG laser, ultrasonic device, and conventional rotary instruments with two dentin bonding systems (an in vitro study). Lasers Med. Sci. 2015;30:969–975.10.1007/s10103-014-1519-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Moor RJG, Delme KI. Erbium lasers adhesion to tooth structure. J. Oral. Laser Appl. 2006;6:7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Keller U, Hibst R. Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Light microscopic and SEM investigations. Lasers Surg. Med. 1989;9:338–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutknecht N, Apel C, Schäfer C, et al. Microleakage of composite fillings in Er, Cr:YSGG laser-prepared class II cavities. Lasers Surg. Med. 2001;28:371–374.10.1002/lsm.v28:4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller U, Hibst R, Geurtsen W, et al. Erbium:YAG laser application in caries therapy. Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance. J. Dent. 1998;26:649–656.10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00036-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato J, Moriya K, Jayawardena JA, et al. Clinical application of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation in children. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 2003;21:151–155.10.1089/PLT.2003.21.issue-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buyukhatipoglu I, Secilmis A. The use of erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in cavity preparation and surface treatment: 3-year follow-up. Eur. J. Dent. 2015;9:284–287.10.4103/1305-7456.156843
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Moor RJ, Delme KI. Laser-assisted cavity preparation and adhesion to erbium-lased tooth structure: part 2. Present-day adhesion to erbium-lased tooth structure in permanent teeth. J. Adhes. Dent. 2010;12:91–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiesch-Scholz M, Hannig M. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation. J. Adhes. Dent. 2000;2:213–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juntavee A, Juntavee N, Peerapattana J. Comparison of marginal microleakage of glass ionomer restorations in primary molars prepared by chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR), erbium: yttrium aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser and atraumatic restorative technique (ART). Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2013;6:75–79.10.5005/jp-journals-10005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delme KI, Deman PJ, Nammour S, et al. Microleakage of class V glass ionomer restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2006;24:715–722.10.1089/pho.2006.24.715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello AM, Mayer MP, Mello FA, et al. Effects of Er:YAG laser on the sealing of glass ionomer cement restorations of bacterial artificial root caries. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2006;24:467–473.10.1089/pho.2006.24.467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrololoomi Z, Razavi F, Soleymani AA. Comparison of micro-leakage from resin-modified glass ıonomer restorationsin cavities prepared by Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet) laser and conventional method in primary teeth. J. Lasers Med. Sci. 2014;5:183–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malekipour MR, Shirani F, Tahmourespour S. The effect of cutting efficacy of diamond burs on microleakage of class V resin composite restorations using total etch and self etch adhesive systems. J. Dent. (Tehran). 2010;7:218–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khier S, Hassan K. Efficacy of composite restorative techniques in marginal sealing of extended class V cavities. ISRN Dent. 2011;180–197.
   Google Scholar
• Mortazavi V, Fathi M, Soltani F. Effect of postoperative bleaching on microleakage of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives. Dent. Res. J. 2011;8:16–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munro GA, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded Class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper. Dent. 1996;21:203–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo RM, Eduardo CP, DuarteJunior SL, et al. Microleakage and nanoleakage: influence of laser in cavity preparation and dentin pretreatment. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 2001;19:325–332.10.1089/PLT.2001.19.issue-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N, et al. Leakage pathway of different nano-restorative materials in class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2009;27:783–789.10.1089/pho.2008.2313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in class V cavities. Am. J. Dent. 2003;16:239–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quo BC, Drummond JL, Koerber A, et al. Glass ionomer microleakage from preparations by an Er/YAG laser or a high-speed handpiece. J. Dent. 2002;30:141–146.10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00011-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems. J. Esthet. Dent. 1994;6:227–244.10.1111/jerd.1994.6.issue-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keller U, Hibst U. Er:YAG laser effects on oral hard and soft tissues. In: Miserendino LJ, Pick RM, editors. Lasers in dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1995. p. 161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Pelagalli J, Gimbel CB, Hansen RT, et al. Investigational study of the use of Er:YAG laser vs. dental drill for caries removal and cavity preparation. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 1997;15:109–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson TF. Bonding glass-ionomer cements to tooth structure. In: Davidson C, Mjör I, editors. Advances in glass ionomer cements. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1999. p. 121–135.
   Google Scholar
• Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Pecora JD, et al. Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2003;30:1008–1014.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01173.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delme KI, Deman PJ, De Moor RJ. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2005;32:676–685.10.1111/jor.2005.32.issue-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delme KI, Deman PJ, De Bruyne MA, et al. Microleakage of glass ionomer formulations after erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser preparation. Lasers Med. Sci. 2010;25:171–180.10.1007/s10103-008-0598-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoroushi M, Ehteshami A. Marginal microleakage of cervical composite resin restorations bonded using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives: two dimensional vs. three dimensional methods. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2016;41:83–90.10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar