Fracture mechanics of dental adhesives supplemented with Polymethyl-vinyl-ether-co-maleic anhydride

References

• Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, et al. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;7:63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci MS, et al. 22-year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater. 2011;27:955–963.10.1016/j.dental.2011.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, et al. Buonocore Memorial Lecture: Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29:481–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjor IA, Moorhead JE. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida. J Am Coll Dent. 1998;65:27–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elderton RJ. Restorations without conventional cavity preparations. Int Dent J. 1988;38:112–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:775–783.10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letzel H Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989;17:S10–S17. (discussion S26–S28).10.1016/0300-5712(89)90156-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjor IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand. 1997;55:58–63.10.3109/00016359709091943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Lobo MM, et al. Adhesive systems and secondary caries formation: assessment of dentin bond strength, caries lesions depth and fluoride release. Dent Mater. 2007;23:308–316.10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annette W, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review of fluoride-releasing restorative materials – fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007;23:343–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Kieri C. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years. Am J Dent. 2004;17:43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell MD, Liu Y, Nowak AP, et al. Bacterial plaque retention on oral hard materials: effect of surface roughness, surface composition, and physisorbed polycarboxylate. J Biomed Mater Res. 2010;92:1518–1527.
   Google Scholar
• Zambon JJ, Reynolds HS, Dunford RG, et al. Effect of a triclosan/copolymer/fluoride dentifrice on the oral microflora. Am J Dent. 1990;3:S27–S34.
   Google Scholar
• Gunsolley JC. A meta-analysis of six-month studies of antiplaque and antigingivitis agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:1649–1657.10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braid JJ, Wale MC. The antibacterial activity of triclosan-impregnated storage boxes against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus and Shewanella putrefaciens in conditions simulating domestic use. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;49:87–94.10.1093/jac/49.1.87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffar A, Donohue JJ, Davis CB, et al. Studies on antibacterially-induced staining. J. Dent Res. 1979;58:210–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkoc S, Demir A, Sengun A, et al. The effect on shear bond strength of different antimicrobial agents after acid etching. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27:484–488.10.1093/ejo/cji032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dundar M, Cal E, Gokce B, et al. Influence of fluoride- or triclosan-based desensitizing agents on adhesion of resin cements to dentin. Clin Oral Invest. 2010;14:579–586.10.1007/s00784-009-0328-7
   Google Scholar
• Sainulabdeen S, Neelakantan P, Ramesh S, et al. Antibacterial activity of triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements – an in vitro pilot study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;35:157–161.10.17796/jcpd.35.2.96747l52725n608x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehgal V, Shetty VS, Mogra S, et al. Evaluation of antimicrobial and physical properties of orthodontic composite resin modified by addition of antimicrobial agents – as in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;131:525–529.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moura MS, de Melo Simplício AH, Cury JA. In-vivo effects of fluoridated antiplaque dentifrice and bonding material on enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130:357–363.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreenivasan PK, Vered Y, Zini A, et al. A 6-month study of the effects of 0.3% triclosan/copolymer dentifrice on dental implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:33–42.10.1111/cpe.2010.38.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicht MJ, Haak R, Kneist S, et al. A triclosan-containing compomer reduces Lactobacillus spp predominant in advanced carious lesions. Dent Mater. 2005;21:831–836.10.1016/j.dental.2004.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderholm KJ. Review of the fracture toughness approach. Dent Mater. 2010;26:e63–e77.10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phrukkanon S. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1998;14:212–221.10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00034-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam LE, Pilliar RM. Fracture toughness of dentin/resin-composite adhesive interfaces. J Dent Res. 1993;72:953–959.10.1177/00220345930720051801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam LE, Pilliar RM. The effect of interface stiffness on dentin-composite interfacial fracture resistance. J Dent. 2000;28:487–493.10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00028-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CT, Pilliar RM. Short-rod elastic-plastic fracture toughness test using miniature specimens. J Mater Sci. 1989;24:2391–2400.10.1007/BF01174501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam LE, Khoshand S, Pilliar RM. Fracture resistance of dentin-composite interfaces using different adhesive resin layers. J Dent. 2001;29:217–225.10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00004-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes VM, Richter R, Vandeven M, et al. Clinical investigation of the antiplaque efficacy of a new variant of a commercially available triclosan/copolymer fluoride dentifrice. J Clin Dent. 2008;19:81–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panagakos FS, Volpe AR, Petrone ME, et al. Advanced oral antibacterial/anti-inflammatory technology: a comprehensive review of the clinical benefits of a triclosan/copolymer/fluoride dentifrice. J Clin Dent. 2005;16:S1–S20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozer F, Park S, Yama BC, et al. Effect of PVM/MA copolymer on bond durability of adhesive resins. JDR 2012; 91A: 1298.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong SR, Boyer DB, Keller JC, et al. Effect of hybrid layer on fracture toughness of adhesively bonded dentin-resin composite joint. Dent Mater. 1998;14:91–98.10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00014-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CP, Douglas WH. Failure mechanisms at the human dentin-resin interface: a fracture mechanics approach. J Biomech. 1994;27:1037–1047.10.1016/0021-9290(94)90220-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong SR, Keller JC, Boyer DB. Mode of failure in the dentin-adhesive resin-resin composite bonded joint as determined by strength-based (muTBS) and fracture-based (CNSB) mechanical testing. Dent Mater. 2001;17:201–210.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00070-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengun A, Unlu N, Ozer F, et al. Bond strength of five current adhesives to caries-affected dentin. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:777–781.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00871.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery TH, Richardson KS. Mechanism and theory in organic chemistry. Menlo Park (CA): Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company; 1997. p. 183.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez JC, Pabon GE, Hilgenberg SP, et al. Effect of water storage on microtensile bond strength of a two-step self-etch adhesive and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2012;25:176–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howard K, Söderholm KJ. Fracture toughness of two dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 2010;26:1185–1192.10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickens SH, Cho BH. Interpretation of bond failure through conversion and residual solvent measurements and Weibull analyses of flexural and microtensile bond strengths of bonding agents. Dent Mater. 2005;21:354–364.10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irache JM, Huici M, Konecny M, et al. Bioadhesive properties of Gantrez nanoparticles. Molecules. 2005;10:126–145.10.3390/10010126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam LE, Pillar RM. Effects of dentin surface treatments on the fracture toughness and tensile bond strength of a dentin–composite adhesive interface. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1530–1538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anunmana C, Anusavice KJ, Mecholsky JJ Jr. Interfacial toughness of bilayer dental ceramics based on a short-bar, chevron-notch test. Dent Mater. 2010;26:111–117.10.1016/j.dental.2009.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan AK, Mitchell CA, Orr JF. Fracture mechanics analysis of the dentine-luting cement interface. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H: J Eng Med. 216:271–276, 2002.10.1243/09544110260138763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar