Low-speed bending impact behavior of adhesively bonded single-lap joints

References

• Adams RD, Comyn J, Wake WC. Structural adhesive joints in engineering. London: Elsevier Applied Science; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal KL, editor. Adhesive joints: formation, characteristics, and testing. New York (NY): Springer, US-Plenum Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva LFM, Ochsner A, editors. Modeling of adhesively bonded joints. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kinloch AJ. Adhesion and adhesives. London: Chapman & Hall; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva LFM, Pirondi A, Ochsner A, editors. Hybrid adhesive joints. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva LFM, Dillard DA, Blackman BRK, Adams RD, editors. Testing adhesive joints: best practices. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva LFM, Campilho RDSG, editors. Advances in numerical modeling of adhesive joints. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal KL, editor. Progress in adhesion and adhesives. Beverly: Wiley-Scrivener Publishing; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Harris JA, Adams RD. An assessment of the impact performance of bonded joints for use in high energy absorbing structures. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci. 1985;199:121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang SS, Yang C, Zhao Y. Impact response of single-lap composite joints. Compos Part B: Eng. 1995;5:1011–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato C, Ikegami K. Dynamic deformation of lap joints and scarf joints under impact loads. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2000;20:17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawa T, Suzuki Y, Kido S. FEM stress analysis and strength of adhesive butt joints of similar hollow cylinders under static and impact tensile loadings. J. Adhes Sci Technol. 2002;16:1449–1468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi I, Sawa T, Suga H. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of single-lap adhesive joints under impact loads. J Adhesion Sci Technol. 2002;16:1585–1601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi I, Sawa T, Suga H. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of single-lap adhesive joints subjected to impact bending moments. J Adhes Sci. Technol. 2002;16:1327–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawa T, Higuchi I, Suga H. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of single-lap adhesive joints of dissimilar adherends subjected to impact tensile loads. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2003;17:2157–2174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya UK, Gautam ARS, Hosur M, et al. Experimental-numerical studies of transverse impact response of adhesively bonded lap joints in composite structures. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2006;26:184–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aga ZA, Woldesenbet E. Bond thickness effect on impact response and damage of adhesively-bonded graphite/epoxy composites. J. Adhes Sci Technol. 2007;21:21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamvalli M, Parameswaran V. Dynamic strength of adhesive single lap joints at high temperature. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2008;28:321–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araldite\textregistered\,2014 epoxy adhesive. Huntsman advanced materials, 2015. Available from: http://www.huntsman.com.
   Google Scholar
• Goglio L, Rossetto M. Impact rupture of structural adhesive joints under different stress combinations. Int J Impact Eng. 2008;35:635–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysol\textregistered\,3425 epoxy adhesive. Henkel AG & Co, 2007. Available from: http://www.henkel.com.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes CS, Camanho PP, Gurdal Z, et al. Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part II: numerical simulations. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:937–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Kim H. Damage resistance of single lap adhesive composite joints by transverse ice impact. Int J Impact Eng. 2010;37:177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim M, Apalak MK. Transverse low-speed impact behavior of adhesively bonded similar and dissimilar clamped plates. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2011;25:69–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apalak MK, Yildirim M. Effect of adhesive thickness on transverse low-speed impact behavior of adhesively bonded similar and dissimilar clamped plates. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2011;25:2587–2613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao L, Kobayashi T, Sawa T, et al. 3-D FEM stress analysis and strength evaluation of single-lap adhesive joints subjected to impact tensile loads. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2011;31:612–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galliot C, Rousseau J, Verchery G. Drop weight tensile impact testing of adhesively bonded carbon/epoxy laminate joints. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2012;35:68–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra RC, Gopinath G, Zheng JQ. Damage and failure in low energy impact of fiber-reinforced polymeric composite laminates. Compos Struct. 2012;94:540–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayman O, Arikan V, Dogan A, et al. Failure analysis of adhesively bonded composite joints under transverse impact and different temperatures. Compos Part B: Eng. 2013;54:409–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loctite\textregistered\, Hysol\textregistered\, 9466 A & B2 epoxy adhesive. Loctite, Henkel AG & Co, 2014. Available from: http://www.henkel.com, http://www.loctite.com.
   Google Scholar
• Ghasemnejad H, Argentiero Y, Tez TA, et al. Impact damage response of natural stitched single lap-joint in composite structures. Mater Des. 2013;51:552–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren ZJ, Ru CQ. Numerical investigation of speed dependent dynamic fracture toughness of line pipe steels. Eng Fract Mech. 2013;99:214–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asgharifar M, Kong F, Carlson B, et al. Dynamic analysis of adhesively bonded joint under solid projectile impact. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2014;50:17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israr HA, Rivallant S, Bouvet C, et al. Finite element simulation of 0°/90° CFRP laminated plates subjected to crushing using a free-face-crushing concept. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2014;62:16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May M, Voss H, Hiermaier S. Predictive modeling of damage and failure in adhesively bonded metallic joints using cohesive interface elements. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2014;49:7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo F, De Luca A, Lamanna G, et al. Numerical investigation of onset and evolution of LVI damages in Carbon-Epoxy plates. Compos Part B: Eng. 2015;68:385–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araldite\textregistered\,2015 epoxy adhesive. Huntsman advanced materials, 2015. Available from: http://www.huntsman.com.
   Google Scholar
• ABAQUS 6.11. Analysis user’s manual. Volume IV: elements Dassault Systemes, 2002--2016. Available from: http://www.3ds.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Wong KJ. Moisture absorption characteristics and effects on mechanical behaviour of carbon/epoxy composite: application to bonded patch repairs of composite structures [doctorate thesis]. Dijon: Université de Bourgogne; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Campilho RDSG, Banea MD, Neto JABP, et al. Modeling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: Effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2013;44:48–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camanho PP, Davila CG. Mixed-mode de-cohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials. Technical Report. NASA/TM-2002-211737. Hampton, Virginia: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)Langley Research Center; 2002. p. 1–37.
   Google Scholar