Marginal integrity of self-adhering flowable composites used as liner under class II restorations: a comparative in vitro micro-CT study

References

• Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, et al. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent. 2001;26:302–307. Epub 2001/05/19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr., et al. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. JADA. 1998;129:567–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, et al. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent. 1996;21:17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao CC, et al. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2001;85:177–183.10.1067/mpr.2001.113780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z, Shimada Y, Sadr A, et al. The effects of cavity size and filling method on the bonding to Class I cavities. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10:447–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Hickel R. Resin composite restorative materials. Aust Dent J. 2011;56:59–66.10.1111/adj.2011.56.issue-s1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vichi A, Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, et al. Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations. Clin Oral Invest. 2013;17:1497–1506.10.1007/s00784-012-0846-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung GS. Reducing marginal leakage of posterior composite resin restorations: a review of clinical techniques. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 1990;63:286–288.10.1016/0022-3913(90)90196-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd EA, Beighton D. Prediction of secondary caries around tooth-colored restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. J Dent Res. 1996;75:1942–1946.10.1177/00220345960750120501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc. 1972;84:1349–1357.10.14219/jada.archive.1972.0226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengo C, Goracci C, Juloski J, et al. Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhering composite. Aust Dent J. 2012;57:220–226.10.1111/adj.2012.57.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabianelli A, Sgarr A, Goracci C, et al. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique. Operative Dentistry. 2010;35:308–313. Epub 2010/06/11.10.2341/09-128-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhika M, Sajjan GS, Kumaraswamy BN, et al. Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations. J ConservDent. 2010;13:9–15. Epub 2010/06/29.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy SN, Jayashankar DN, Nainan M, et al. The effect of flowable composite lining thickness with various curing techniques on microleakage in class II composite restorations: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14:56–60. Epub 2013/04/13.10.5005/jp-journals-10024
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Operative Dentistry. 2011;36:213–221. Epub 2011/06/28.10.2341/10-215-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majety KK, Pujar M. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of class II packable composite resin restorations using flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomers as intermediate layers. J Conservative Dentistry. 2011;14:414–417. Epub 2011/12/07.10.4103/0972-0707.87215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Güngör HC, Canoğlu E, Çehreli ZC. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatric Dentistry. 2014;38:223–228. Epub 2014/08/06.10.17796/jcpd.38.3.h551um6313618465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdeva P, Goswami M, Singh D. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and nanoleakage of conventional and self-adhering flowable composites to primary teeth dentin. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016;7:326–331. Epub 2016/09/16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naga AA, Yousef M, Ramadan R, et al. Does the use of a novel self-adhesive flowable composite reduce nanoleakage? Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015;7:55–64. Epub 2015/04/08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamburoğlu K, Kurt H, Kolsuz E, et al. Occlusal caries depth measurements obtained by five different imaging modalities. J Digit Imaging. 2011;24:804–813. Epub 2010/12/01.10.1007/s10278-010-9355-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeiger DN, Sun J, Schumacher GE, et al. Evaluation of dental composite shrinkage and leakage in extracted teeth using X-ray microcomputed tomography. Dent Mater. 2009;25:1213–1220.10.1016/j.dental.2009.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera CA, Lan C, Escobar-Sanabria D, et al. The use of micro-CT with image segmentation to quantify leakage in dental restorations. Dent Mater. 2015;31:382–390.10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boruziniat A, Gharaee S, Sarraf Shirazi A, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of flowable composite as lining material on microleakage of composite resin restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int. 2016;47:93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengo C, Spagnuolo G, Ametrano G, et al. Marginal leakage of bulk fill composites in class II restorations: a microCT and digital microscope analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2015;60:123–129.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin A, Tassery H, D’Hoore W, et al. Influence of the number of sections on reliability of in vitro microleakage evaluations. Am J Dent. 2003;16:207–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak V, Cuijpers V, et al. Micro-CT for measuring marginal leakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary molars prepared in vivo. Am J Dent. 2008;21:393–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Cuijpers V, et al. Micro-CT for measuring marginal leakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary molars prepared in vivo. Am J Dent. 2008;21:393–397 . Epub 2009/01/17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Cuijpers V, Fan M, et al. Marginal leakage of two newer glass-ionomer-based sealant materials assessed using micro-CT. J Dent. 2010;38:731–735 . Epub 2010/06/29.10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Cuijpers V, Fan MW, et al. Validation of micro-CT against the section method regarding the assessment of marginal leakage of sealants. Aust Dent J. 2012;57:196–199.10.1111/adj.2012.57.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengo C, Goracci C, Ametrano G, et al. Marginal leakage of class V composite restorations assessed using microcomputed tomography and scanning electron microscope. Operative Dentistry. 2015;40:440–448.10.2341/14-022-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, et al. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res. 2000;79:1385–1391.10.1177/00220345000790060601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27:89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, et al. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8:306–335.10.1177/10454411970080030501
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aranha AC, Pimenta LA. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage. Am J Dent. 2004;17:99–103. Epub 2004/05/21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagis YH, Baltacioglu IH, Kahyaogullari S. Comparing microleakage and the layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in wide class II MOD cavities. Operative Dentistry. 2009;34:578–585.10.2341/08-073-LR
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik EU, Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S. Effect of different surface pre-treatment methods on the microleakage of two different self-adhesive composites in class V cavities. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16:33–38 . Epub 2015/03/21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bektas OO, Eren D, Akin EG, et al. Evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite in terms of micro-shear bond strength and microleakage. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:541–546.10.3109/00016357.2012.696697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poss SD. Utilization of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin. Dent Today. 2010;29:104–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadeghi M. An in vitro microleakage study of class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin versus different flowable materials. Dent Res J. 2012;9:460–465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heintze SD. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(Suppl 1):77–106. Epub 2008/03/18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Lohbauer U, et al. Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:107–116. Epub 2008/03/18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar