Variables controlling tensile strength of stabilized sand with cement and zeolite

References

• Forcelini M, Garbin GR, Faro VP, et al. Mechanical behavior of soil cement blends with Osorio sand. Procedia Eng. 2016;143:75–81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.01010.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.010
   Google Scholar
• Consoli NC, Foppa D, Festugato L, et al. Key parameters for strength control of artificially cemented soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 2007;133(2):197–205.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:2(197)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consoli N, L Da silva lopez, D Foppa, et al. Key parameters dictating strength of lime/cement-treated soils. Proc Inst Civ Eng Eng. 2009; 162(2):111–118.10.1680/geng.2009.162.2.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consoli NC, Festugato L, da Rocha CG, et al. Key parameters for strength control of rammed sand–cement mixtures: influence of types of portland cement. Constr Build Mater. 2013;49:591–597.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consoli NC, Foppa D. Porosity/cement ratio controlling initial bulk modulus and incremental yield stress of an artificially cemented soil cured under stress. Géotech Lett. 2014;4:22–26.10.1680/geolett.13.00081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festugato L, Menger E, Benezra F, et al. Fibre-reinforced cemented soils compressive and tensile strength assessment as a function of filament length. Geotext Geomembranes. 2017;45(1):77–82.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomé A, Donato M, Consoli NC, et al. Circular footings on a cemented layer above weak foundation soil. Can Geotech J. 2005;42(6):1569–1584.10.1139/t05-069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalla Rosa F, Consoli NC, Baudet BA. An experimental investigation of the behaviour of artificially cemented soil cured under stress. Géotechnique. 2008;58(8):675–679.10.1680/geot.2008.58.8.675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horpibulsuk S, Suddeepong A, Suksiripattanapong C, et al. Water-void to cement ratio identity of lightweight cellular-cemented material. J Mater Civ Eng. 2014;26(10):06014021.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz E, Belem T, Benzaazoua M. Specimen size effect on strength behavior of cemented paste backfills subjected to different placement conditions. Eng Geol. 2015;185:52–62.10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consoli NC, Cruz RC, Floss MF, et al. Parameters controlling tensile and compressive strength of artificially cemented sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 2009;136(5):759–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon CS, Lam L, Kou SC, et al. A study on the hydration rate of natural zeolite blended cement pastes. Constr Build Mater. 1999;13(8):427–432.10.1016/S0950-0618(99)00048-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canpolat F, Yılmaz K, Köse MM, et al. Use of zeolite, coal bottom ash and fly ash as replacement materials in cement production. Cem Concr Res. 2004;34(5):731–735.10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00063-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yılmaz B, Uçar A, Öteyaka B, et al. Properties of zeolitic tuff (clinoptilolite) blended portland cement. Build Environ. 2007;42(11):3808–3815.10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mola-Abasi H, Shooshpasha I. Influence of zeolite and cement additions on mechanical behavior of sandy soil. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 2016;8(5):746–752.10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MolaAbasi H, Shooshpasha I. Prediction of zeolite–cement–sand unconfined compressive strength using polynomial neural network. Eur Phys J Plus. 2016;131(4):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mola-Abasi H, Kordtabar B, Kordnaeij A. Effect of natural zeolite and cement additive on the strength of sand. Geotech Geol Eng. 2016;34(5):1539–1551.10.1007/s10706-016-0060-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mola-Abasi H, Kordtabar B, Kordnaeij A. Parameters controlling strength of zeolite–cement–sand mixture. Int J Geotech Eng. 2017;11(1):72–79.10.1080/19386362.2016.1186412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MolaAbasi, Hossein, Shooshpasha I. Polynomial models controlling strength of zeolite–cement sand mixtures Scientia Iranica [Internet]. Press Sci Iran. 2017;24(2):526–536. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.2415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough GW, Sitar N, Bachus RC, et al. Cemented sands under static loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 1981;107(ASCE 16319 Proceeding).
   Google Scholar
• Consoli NC, Prietto PDM, Carraro JAH, et al. Behavior of compacted soil-fly ash-carbide lime mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 2001;127(9):774–782.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:9(774)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toll DG, Ali RZ. Critical state shear strength of an unsaturated artificially cemented sand. Géotechnique. 2016;67(3):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi SS, Melkoumian N, Taheri A, et al. The failure behaviour of poorly cemented sands at a borehole wall using laboratory tests. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Standard A. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). In: Annu B ASTM Stand. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C. 150. Standard specification for Portland cement. Annu B ASTM Stand. 2002;4, ASTM International. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/c0150_c0150m-17
   Google Scholar
• Association BS. Mortar and concrete – test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical specimens. 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Standard A. D3967. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of intact rock core specimens. Annu B ASTM Stand Am Soc Test Mater. West Conshohocken (PA); 1995.
   Google Scholar