Characterization of fracture energy and toughness of air plasma PDMS–PDMS bonding by T-peel testing

References

• Qin D, Xia Y, Whitesides GM. Soft lithography for micro- and nanoscale patterning. Nat Protocols. 2010;5:491–502.10.1038/nprot.2009.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Whitesides GM. Soft lithography. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1998;37:550–575.10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao Q, Huang J, Zhu T, et al. A hybrid model to determine mechanical properties of soft polymers by nanoindentation. Mech Mater. 2010;42:1043–1047.10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider F, Draheim J, Kamberger R, et al. Process and material properties of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) for optical MEMS. Sens Actuat A: Phys. 2009;151:95–99.10.1016/j.sna.2009.01.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown XQ, Ookawa K, Wong JY. Evaluation of polydimethylsiloxane scaffolds with physiologically-relevant elastic moduli: interplay of substrate mechanics and surface chemistry effects on vascular smooth muscle cell response. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3123–3129.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston ID, McCluskey DK, Tan CKL, et al. Mechanical characterization of bulk Sylgard 184 for microfluidics and microengineering. J Micromech Microeng. 2014;24:035017.10.1088/0960-1317/24/3/035017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuard D, Tzvetkova-Chevolleau T, Decossas S, et al. Optimization of poly-di-methyl-siloxane (PDMS) substrates for studying cellular adhesion and motility. Microelectron Eng. 2008;85:1289–1293.10.1016/j.mee.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firpo G, Angeli E, Repetto L, et al. Permeability thickness dependence of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membranes. J Membr Sci. 2015;481:1–8.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel T, Bondar V, Nagai K, et al. Gas sorption, diffusion, and permeation in poly(dimethylsiloxane). J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys. 2000;38:415–434.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Cf, Drew KL. Droplet-based microdialysis concept, theory, and design consideration. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1209:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezai P, Selvaganapathy PR, Wohl GR. Plasma enhanced bonding of polydimethylsiloxane with parylene and its optimization. J Micromech Microeng. 2011;21:065024 (13 pp).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollahan JR, Carlson GL. Hydroxylation of polymethylsiloxane surfaces by oxidizing plasmas. J Appl Polym Sci. 1970;14:2499–2508.10.1002/app.1970.070141006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graubner VM, Jordan R, Nuyken O, et al. Wettability and surface composition of poly(dimethylsiloxane) irradiated at 172 nm. Polym Mater: Sci Eng. 2003;88:488–489.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz J, Owen MJ. Hydrophobic recovery of plasma-treated polydimethylsiloxane. J Adhesion. 1995;54:33–45.10.1080/00218469508014379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald JC, Duffy DC, Anderson JR, et al. Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Electrophoresis. 2000;21:27–40.10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo BH, Van Lerberghe LM, Motsegood KM, et al. Three-dimensional micro-channel fabrication in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer. J Microelectromech systems. 2000;9:76–81.10.1109/84.825780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangawng AL, Swartz MA, Glucksberg MR, et al. Bond-detach lithography: a method for micro/nanolithograpy by precision PDMS patterning. Small. 2007;3:132–138.10.1002/(ISSN)1613-6829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger MA, Chou HP, Thorsen T, et al. Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science. 2000;288:113–116.10.1126/science.288.5463.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodas D, Khan-Malek C. Hydrophilization and hydrophobic recovery of PDMS by oxygen plasma and chemical treatment—An SEM investigation. Sens Actuat B. 2007;123:368–373.10.1016/j.snb.2006.08.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nania M, Matar OK, Cabral JT. Frontal vitrification of PDMS using air plasma and consequences for surface wrinkling. Soft Matter. 2015;11:3067–3075.10.1039/C4SM02840F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartali R, Lorenzelli L, Scarpa M, et al . Super-hydrophilic PDMS and PET surfaces for microfluidic devices. Adv Sci Technol. 2013;81:96–100.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton RA, Price CR, Runge AF, et al. Air plasma treatment of submicron thick PDMS polymer films: effect of oxidation time and storage conditions. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects. 2005;253:213–215.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen IJ, Lindner E. The stability of radio-frequency plasma treated polydimethylsiloxane surface. Langmuir. 2007;23:3118–3122.10.1021/la0627720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrick Plasma. Benefits of plasma treatment for microfluidic device fabrication. [cited 2014]. Available from: http://harrickplasma.com/applications/microfluidic-devices.
   Google Scholar
• Eddings MA, Johnson MA, Gale BK. Determining the optimal PDMS–PDMS bonding technique of microfluidic devices. J Micromech Microeng. 2008;18:067001 (4 pp).
   Google Scholar
• Tang KC, Liao E, Ong WL, et al. Evaluation of bonding between oxygen plasma treated polydimethyl siloxane and passivated silicon. J Phys: Conf Series. 2006;34:155–161.
   Google Scholar
• Sunkara V, Park DK, Hwang H, et al. Simple room temperature bonding of thermoplastics and poly(dimethylsiloxane). Lab Chip. 2011;11:962–965.10.1039/C0LC00272 K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Cf, Wharton K. Characterization and failure mode analyses of air plasma oxidized PDMS–PDMS bonding by peel testing. RSC Adv. 2017;7:1286–1289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y-W, Lin P-T. A line force model to measure the strength of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-to-PDMS bonding using blister tests. Proc Nanotech. 2007;2:190–193.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S, Datta A, Berg JM, et al. Studies on surface wettability of poly(dimethyl) siloxane (PDMS) and glass under oxygen-plasma treatment and correlation with bond strength. J Microelectromech Syst. 2005;14:590–597.10.1109/JMEMS.2005.844746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Zheng H, Gourdin S, et al. Polymer-on-polymer stamping: universal approaches to chemically patterned surfaces. Langmuir. 2002;18:2607–2615.10.1021/la011098d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillborg H, Tomczak N, Olàh A, et al. Nanoscale hydrophobic recovery: a chemical force microscopy study of UV/ozone-treated cross-linked poly(dimethylsiloxane). Langmuir. 2004;20:785–794.10.1021/la035552 k
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hourlier-Fargette A, Antkowiak A, Chateauminois A, et al. Role of uncrosslinked chains in droplets dynamics on silicone elastomers. Soft Matter. 2017;13:3484–3491.10.1039/C7SM00447H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobel M, Dunatov C, Strobel JM, et al. Low-molecular-weight materials on corona-treated polypropylene. J Adhes Sci Technol. 1989;3:321–335.10.1163/156856189X00245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standard ISO 11339. Adhesives T-peel test for flexible-to-flexible bonded assemblies; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM.Standard Test methods for tension testing of Metallic Materials. E8/E8M-15a; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kawashita LF, Moore DR, Williams JG. Protocols for the measurement of adhesive fracture by peel tests. J Adhes. 2006;82:973–995.10.1080/00218460600876142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genesky GD, Cohen C. Toughness and fracture energy of PDMS bimodal and trimodal networks with widely separated precursor molar masses. Polymer. 2010;51:4152–4159.10.1016/j.polymer.2010.06.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake GJ, Thomas AG. The strength of highly elastic materials. Proc Roy Soc London Series A Math Phys Sci. 1967;300:108–119.10.1098/rspa.1967.0160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelle VH, Hyun-Joong C, Anastasia LE. Irreversible bonding of polyimide and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) based on a thiol-epoxy click reaction. J Micromech Microeng. 2016;26:105019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhury MK. Rate-dependent fracture at adhesive interface. J Phys Chem B. 1999;103:6562–6566.10.1021/jp9906482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen MJ, Smith PJ. Plasma treatment of polydimethylsiloxane. J Adhes Sci Technol. 1994;8:1063–1075.10.1163/156856194X00942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillborg H, Ankner JF, et al. Crosslinked polydimethylsiloxane exposed to oxygen plasma studied by neutron reflectometry and other surface specific techniques. Polymer. 2000;41:6851–6863.10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00039-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills KL, Zhu X, Takayama S, et al. The mechanical properties of a surface-modified layer on polydimethylsiloxane. J Mater Res. 2008;23:37–48.10.1557/JMR.2008.0029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobel M, Lyons CS. The role of low-molecular-weight oxidized materials in the adhesion properties of corona-treated polypropylene film. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2003;17:15–23.10.1163/15685610360472411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewis D, Briggs D. Adhesion to polyethylene and polypropylene. Polymer. 1981;22:7–16.10.1016/0032-3861(81)90068-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite NSJ. Introduction to gas discharges. Plasma Sources Sci Technol. 2000;9:517–527.10.1088/0963-0252/9/4/307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau K, Millare B, Lin A, et al. Dependence of the quality of adhesion between poly(dimethylsiloxane) and glass surfaces on the composition of the oxidizing plasma. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2011;10:907–917.10.1007/s10404-010-0724-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar