HPLC analysis of eluted monomers released from dental composites containing bioactive glass

References

• Cramer NB, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J Dent Res. 2011;90(4):402–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1995;6(4):302–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geurtsen W. Substances released from dental resin composites and glass ionomer cements. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106(2 Pt 2):687–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater. 2006;22(3):211–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Taira M, Shintani H, et al. Residual monomers (TEGDMA and Bis-GMA) of a set visible-light-cured dental composite resin when immersed in water. J Oral Rehab. 1991;18(4):353–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurtsen W, Lehmann F, Spahl W, et al. Cytotoxicity of 35 dental resin composite monomers/additives in permanent 3T3 and three human primary fibroblast cultures. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;41(3):474–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshii E. Cytotoxic effects of acrylates and methacrylates: relationships of monomer structures and cytotoxicity. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;37(4):517–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichl FX, Simon S, Esters M, et al. Cytotoxicity of dental composite (co)monomers and the amalgam component Hg(2+) in human gingival fibroblasts. Arch Toxicol. 2006;80(8):465–472.10.1007/s00204-006-0073-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thonemann B, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, et al. Responses of L929 mouse fibroblasts, primary and immortalized bovine dental papilla-derived cell lines to dental resin components. Dent Mater. 2002;18(4):318–323.10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00056-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, et al. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent. 2005;18(3):198–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, et al. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6):763–772.10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6):775–783.10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, et al. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a review. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7(2):63–70.10.1007/s00784-003-0206-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waltimo T, Brunner TJ, Vollenweider M, et al. Antimicrobial effect of nanometric bioactive glass 45S5. J Dent Res. 2007;86(8):754–757.10.1177/154405910708600813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollenweider M, Brunner TJ, Knecht S, et al. Remineralization of human dentin using ultrafine bioactive glass particles. Acta Biomater. 2007;3(6):936–943.10.1016/j.actbio.2007.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubler M, Brunner TJ, Zehnder M, et al. Do bioactive glasses convey a disinfecting mechanism beyond a mere increase in pH? Int Endontic J. 2008;41(8):670–678.10.1111/iej.2008.41.issue-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan I, Newman H, Wilson M. Antibacterial activity of particulate Bioglass® against supra-and subgingival bacteria. Biomaterials. 2001;22(12):1683–1687.10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00330-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzistavrou X, Fenno JC, Faulk D, et al. Fabrication and characterization of bioactive and antibacterial composites for dental applications. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(8):3723–3732.10.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khvostenko D, Mitchell JC, Hilton TJ, et al. Mechanical performance of novel bioactive glass containing dental restorative composites. Dent Mater. 2013;29(11):1139–1148.10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi S, Gwinner F, Mitchell JC, et al. Cytotoxicity of resin composites containing bioactive glass fillers. Dent Mater. 2015;31(2):195–203.10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloukos D, Pandis N, Eliades T. Bisphenol-A and residual monomer leaching from orthodontic adhesive resins and polycarbonate brackets: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143(4):S104–S12.10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Shiflett RA, et al. Correlation of cytotoxicity, filler loading and curing time of dental composites. Biomaterials. 1991;12(8):737–740.10.1016/0142-9612(91)90022-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issa Y, Watts DC, Brunton PA, et al. Resin composite monomers alter MTT and LDH activity of human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. Dent Mater. 2004;20(1):12–20.10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00053-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehe K, Reichl FX, Durner J, et al. Cytotoxicity of dental composite components and mercury compounds in pulmonary cells. Biomaterials. 2001;22(4):317–322.10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00184-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillingham EO, Lawrence WH, Autian J, et al. Acrylate and methacrylate esters: relationship of hemolytic activity andin vivo toxicity. J Biomed Mater Res. 1983;17(6):945–957.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichl FX, Walther UI, Durner J, et al. Cytotoxicity of dental composite components and mercury compounds in lung cells. Dent Mater. 2001;17(2):95–101.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00029-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann BE, Bindslev N, Poulsen SS, et al. Effects of cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase inhibition on basal- and serotonin-induced ion transport in rat colon. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002;132(1):37–52.10.1016/S1532-0456(02)00042-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altintas SH, Usumez A. Evaluation of monomer leaching from a dual cured resin cement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;86B(2):523–529.10.1002/jbm.b.v86b:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sideridou ID, Achilias DS. Elution study of unreacted Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, and Bis-EMA from light-cured dental resins and resin composites using HPLC. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2005;74B(1):617–626.10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelsen VB, Lygre H, Skalevik R, et al. Identification of organic eluates from four polymer-based dental filling materials. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111(3):263–271.10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00033.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Huang HM, Lin CY, et al. Leached components from dental composites in oral simulating fluids and the resultant composite strengths. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25(8):575–588.10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00284.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moharamzadeh K, Van Noort R, Brook IM, et al. HPLC analysis of components released from dental composites with different resin compositions using different extraction media. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2007;18(1):133–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrzejewska E. Photopolymerization kinetics of multifunctional monomers. Prog Polym Sci. 2001;26(4):605–665.10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00004-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap AU, Lee HK, Sabapathy R. Release of methacrylic acid from dental composites. Dent Mater. 2000;16(3):172–179.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00004-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim ME, Park SH. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods. Oper Dent. 2011;36(3):326–334.10.2341/10-315-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortengren U, Wellendorf H, Karlsson S, et al. Water sorption and solubility of dental composites and identification of monomers released in an aqueous environment. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(12):1106–1115.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00802.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller H, Olsson S, Söderholm kJ. The effect of comonomer composition, silane heating, and filler type on aqueous TEGDMA leachability in model resin composites. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105(4):362–365.10.1111/eos.1997.105.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothmund L, Reichl FX, Hickel R, et al. Effect of layer thickness on the elution of bulk-fill composite components. Dent Mater. 2017;33(1):54–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkut E, Torlak E, Altunsoy M. Antimicrobial and mechanical properties of dental resin composite containing bioactive glass. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2016;14(3):e296–e301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khvostenko D, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, et al. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2016;32(1):73–81.10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar