The effect of Er:YAG laser and bulk filled composite type on marginal adaptation of class II cavities: an SEM analysis study

References

• Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, et al. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2001;17:253–259.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00079-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1991;7:107–113.10.1016/0109-5641(91)90055-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005;21:9–20.10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int. 2000;31:165–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL. Resin composite – state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27:29–38.10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerbeek BV, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin. current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28:215–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bausch JR, de Lange K, Davidson CL, et al. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;48:59–67.10.1016/0022-3913(82)90048-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:227–235.10.1007/s00784-012-0702-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassila LV, Nagas E, Vallittu PK, et al. Translucency of flowable bulk-filling composites of various thicknesses. Chin J Dent Res. 2012;15:31–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nomoto R, Asada M, McCabe JF, et al. Light exposure required for optimum conversion of light activated resin systems. Dent Mater. 2006;22:1135–1142.10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibst R, Keller U. Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med. 1989;9:338–344.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, et al. Ablation depths and morphological changes in human enamel and dentin after Er:YAG laser irradiation with or without water mist. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1999;17:105–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hibst RJ. Lasers for caries removal and cavity preparation: state of the art and future directions. J Oral Laser Appl. 2002;2:203–211.
   Google Scholar
• Keller U, Hibst R, Geurtsen W, et al. Erbium:YAG laser application in caries therapy. Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance. J Dent. 1988;26:649–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N, et al. Leakage pathway of different nano-restorative materials in class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009;27:783–789.10.1089/pho.2008.2313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, et al. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies. J Dent. 2014;42:619–625.10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolotto T, Onisor I, Krejci I. Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:35–43.10.1007/s00784-006-0076-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Hickel R. Resin composite restorative materials. Aust Dent J. 2011;56:59–66.10.1111/adj.2011.56.issue-s1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology. Dent Mater. 2011;27:348–355.10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suliman AH, Boyer DB, Lakes RS. Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins: comparison with tooth deformation. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:7–12.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90247-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in Class V cavities. Am J Dent. 2003;16:239–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL. Buonocore lecture. Placing dental composites—a stressful experience. Oper Dent. 2008;33:247–257.10.2341/07-BL2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res. 2000;79:812–817.10.1177/00220345000790030501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21:1150–1157.10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uno S, Shımokobe H. Contraction stress and marginal adaptation of composite restorations in dentinal cavity. Dent Mater J. 1994;13:19–24.10.4012/dmj.13.19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heintze SD, Monreal D, Peschke A. Marginal quality of Class II composite restorations placed in bulk compared to an incremental technique: evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17:147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos EA, Ardu S, Lefever D, et al. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42:575–581.10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furness A, Tadros MY, Looney SW, et al. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42:439–449.10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goracci C, Cadenaro M, Fontanive L, et al. Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites. Dent Mater. 2014;30:688–694.10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhingan P, Sachdev V, Sandhu M, et al. Shear bond strength of self-etching adhesives to cavities prepared by diamond bur or Er, Cr:YSGG laser and effect of prior acid etching. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17:505–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammed G, Dayem R. Evaluation of the microleakage of different class V cavities prepared by using Er:YAG laser, ultrasonic device, and conventional rotary instruments with two dentin bonding systems (an in vitro study). Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30:969–975.10.1007/s10103-014-1519-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galafassi D, Scatena C, Galo R, et al. Clinical evaluation of composite restorations in Er:YAG laser-prepared cavities re-wetting with chlorhexidine. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(4):1231–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral FL, Colucci V, Souza-Gabriel AE, et al. Bond durability in erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser-irradiated enamel. Lasers Med Sci. 2010;25:155–163.10.1007/s10103-008-0593-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranha AC, Turbino ML, Powell GL, et al. Assessing microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;37:172–177.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, et al. Influence of the use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation and surface treatment in microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations. Oper Dent. 2004;29:430–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Munck J, Meerbeek BV, Yudhira R, et al. Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to Erbium:YAG-lased vs: bur-cut enamel and dentin. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:322–329.10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21281.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corona SA, Borsatto M, Dibb RG, et al. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation. Oper Dent. 2001;26:491–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiesch-Scholz M, Hannig M. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2:213–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar