Determination of traction-separation laws on an acrylic adhesive under shear and tensile loading

References

• Hart-Smith LJ. Adhesive-Bonded Single Lap Joints, Langley Research Center, NASA CR-112236;1973.
   Google Scholar
• Harris JA, Adams RD. Strength prediction of bonded single lap joints by nonlinear finite element methods. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 1984;4:65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Adams RD, Wake WC. Structural adhesive joints in engineering. Elsevier Applied Science Publisher: London and New York;1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bigwood DA, Crocombe AD. Nonlinear adhesive bonded joint design analysis. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 1990;10:31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson GP, Brinton SH, Ninow KJ et al. A fracture mechanics approach to predicting bond strength. In: Bigwood DA, Crocombe AD, editors. Advances Adhesively-Bonded Joints, New York: ASME;1988. p. 93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Chai H. Shear fracture. Int J Fract. 1988;37:137–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernlund G, Papini M, McCammond D, et al. Fracture load predictions for adhesive joints. Comp Sci Tech. 1994;51:587–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong L. Bond strength for adhesive bonded single lap joints. Acta Mechanica 1996;117:103–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfano M, Furgiuele F, Leonardi A, et al. Mode I fracture of adhesive joints using tailored cohesive zone models. Int J Fract. 2009;157:193–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafkalidis MS, Thouless MD, Yang QD, et al. Deformation and fracture of adhesive layers constrained by plastically-deforming adherends. J Adhesion Sci Technol. 2000;14:1593–1607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalli MN and Thouless MD. The effect of damage nucleation on the toughness of adhesive joint. J Adhesion 2001;76:75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Yeo E, Blacklock M, et al. Predicting the strength of adhesively bonded joints of variable thickness using a cohesive element approach. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 2015;58:44–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji G, Ouyang Z, Li G, Ibekwe S. Effect of adhesive thickness on global and local Mode-I interfacial fracture of bonded joints. Int J Solids Structures 2010;47:2358–2445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson T, Biel A. On the effective constitutive properties of a thin adhesive layer loaded in peel. Int J Fract. 2006;141:227–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biel A, Stigh Ulf. Damage and plasticity in adhesive layer: an experimental study. Int J Fract. 2010;165:93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quyang GJZ, Li G. Local interface shear fracture of bonded steel joints with various bondline thickness. Int J Fract. 2010;52:481–491.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira AB, de Morais AB. Strength of adhesively bonded stainless steel joints. Int J Adhesion and Adhesives 2003;23:315–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd SW, Winkle IE, Day AH. Bonded butt joints in pultruded GRP panels-an experimental study. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 2004;24:263–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirnondi A, Morini F. An investigation of fatigue failure prediction of adhesively bonded metal/metal joints. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 2009;29:796–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro, Keller T. Ductile double-lap joints from brittle GFRP laminates and ductile adhesives, Part 1: experimental investigation. Comp Part B. 2008;B39:271–281.
   Google Scholar
• Marzi S, Biel A, Stigh Ulf, On experimental methods to investigate the effect of layer thickness on the fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 2011;31:840–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Liechti KM, Ravi-Chandar M. Direct extraction of rate-dependent traction-separation laws for polyuria/steel interface. Int J of Solids and Structures 2009;46:31–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks-Sills L, Sherman D. JII fracture testing of a plastically deforming material. Int J Fract. 1991;50:15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chronological science tables. 2017, National Institute of Natural Science, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, MARUZEN publishing Co. Ltd., 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Chai H, Chiang MYM. A crack propagation criterion based on local shear strain in adhesive bonds subjected to shear. J Mech Phy Solids. 1996;44:1669–1689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imanaka M, Orita R, Nakamura Y, Kimoto M. Comparison of failure mechanisms between rubber-modified and unmodified epoxy adhesives under mode II loading condition. J of Mat Sci. 2008;43:3223–3233.
   Google Scholar
• Giessen EV, Seelig T. Computational modeling of rubber-toughening in amorphous thermoplastic polymers: a review. Int J Fract. 2015;196:207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard DA. Fracture mechanics of adhesive bonds. In: Adams editor. Adhesive bonding. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.; 2005. p.189–208.
   Google Scholar