Bonded composite repair of metallic pipeline using energy release rate method

References

• Saeed N, Ronagh HR. Design of fiber reinforced polymer overwraps for pipe pressure. In: Karbhari VM, editor. Rehabilitation of pipelines using fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. Vol. 10. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015. p. 211–223.
   Google Scholar
• Banea MD, da Silva LFM. Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: an overview. Proc IMechE. 2009;223:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhe S, Banea MD, de Barros S, et al. An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2017;72:30–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. ISO/PDTS 24817. Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries. Composite repairs for pipework. Qualification and design, installation, testing and inspection; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Seica VM, Packer AJ. FRP materials for the rehabilitation of tubular steel structures for underwater applications. Compos Struct. 2007;80:440–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Barros S, Banea MD, Budhe S, et al. Experimental analysis of metal-composite repair of floating offshore units (FPSO). J Adhes. 2017;93:147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch GH, Brongers MPH, Thompson NG, et al. Corrosion cost and preventive strategies in the United States, Federal Highway Administration. McLean (VA): Office of Infrastructure Research and Development; 2001. p. 260–311.
   Google Scholar
• Rohen NRF, Pacheco LJ, Budhe S, et al. Development and qualification of a new polymeric matrix laminated composite for pipe repair. Compos Struct. 2016;152:737–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çitil Ş, Ayaz Y, Temiz Ş, et al. Mechanical behaviour of adhesively repaired pipes subject to internal pressure. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2017;75:88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayaz Y, Çitil Ş, Şahan MF. Repair of small damages in steel pipes with composite patches. Mat-Wiss u Werkstofftech. 2016;47:503–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Costa Mattos HS, Reis JML, Paim LM, et al. Failure analysis of corroded pipelines reinforced with composite repair systems. Eng Fail Anal. 2016;59:223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Barros S, Fadhil BM, Alila F, et al. Using blister test to predict the failure pressure in bonded composite repaired pipes. Comp Struct. 2019;211:125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Barros S, Budhe S, Banea MD, et al. An assessment of composite repair system in offshore platform for corroded circumferential welds in super duplex steel pipe. Frattura e Integrita Strutturale. 2018;12:151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Budhe S, Banea MD, Rohem NRF, et al. Failure pressure analysis of composite repair system for wall loss defect of metallic pipelines. Compos Struct. 2017;176:1013–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhe S, Banea MD, Rohem NRF, et al. Assessment of failure pressure of a GFRP composite repair system for wall loss defect in metallic pipelines. Materialwiss Werkstofftech. 2017;49:902–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. ASME PCC-2. Repair of Pressure Equipment Piping. New York (NY): American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Alnaser HA, Keller MW. Comparison of coupon and full-scale determination of energy release rate for bonded composite repairs of pressure equipment. Eng Fract Mech. 2015;146:31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves JP, da Silva LFM, de Moura M, et al. Fracture mechanics tests in adhesively bonded joints: a literature review. J Adhes. 2014;90:955–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H-B, Naito K, Oguma H. Fracture toughness of adherends bonded with two-part acrylic-based adhesive: double cantilever beam tests under static loading. Appl Adhes Sci. 2016;4:10.
   Google Scholar
• Arouche MM, Budhe S, Alves LA, et al. Effect of moisture on the adhesion of CFRP-to-steel bonded joints using peel tests. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2018;40:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arouche MM, Wang W, de Freitas ST, et al. Strain-based methodology for mixed-mode I + II fracture: A new partitioning method for bi-material adhesively bonded joints. J Adhes. 2019;95:385–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM A36: standard specification for carbon structural steel. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM D1599: standard test method for resistance to short –time hydraulic pressure of plastic pipe, tubing and fittings. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• de Moura M, Campilho R, Gonçalves J. Crack equivalent concept applied to the fracture characterization of bonded joints under pure mode I loading. Compos Sci Tech. 2008;68:2224–2230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado J, Marques E, Campilho R, et al. Mode I fracture toughness of CFRP as a function of temperature and strain rate. J Compos Mater. 2017;51:3315–3326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renart J, Budhe S, Carreras L, et al. A new testing device to simultaneously measure the mode I fatigue delamination behavior of a batch of specimens. Int J Fatigue. 2018;116:275–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman BRK, Kinloch AJ. Determination of the mode I adhesive fracture energy, GIc, of structural adhesives using the Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) and Tapered Cantilever Beam (TDCB) specimens. Version 97-04. ESIS TC4 Protocol; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. BS 7991. Determination of the mode I adhesive fracture energy, G_IC, of structural adhesives using the Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) and Tapered Cantilever Beam (TDCB) specimens. London: British Standards Institution; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Creton C, Kramer EJ, Hui CY, et al. Failure mechanism of polymer interfaces reinforced with block copolymers. Macromolecules. 1992;25:3075–3088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernlund G, Spelt JK. Mixed mode fracture characterization of adhesive joints. Compos Sci Tech. 1994;50:441–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopple MF, Lauterbach S, Wagner W. Composite repair of through-wall defects in pipework – analytical and numerical models with respect to ISO/TS 24817. Compos Struct. 2013;95:173–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar