Effect of different artificial aging protocols on marginal sealing ability of self-etch dental adhesives: micro-computed tomography evaluation

References

• Stangel I, Ellis TH, Sacher E. Adhesion to tooth structure mediated by contemporary bonding systems. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(3):677–694.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heintze SD. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mater. 2013;29(1):59–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Dionysopoulos P, Koumpia E. In vivo evaluation of microleakage from composites with new dentine adhesives. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(10):1014–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PN, et al. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res. 1999;78(4):906–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa AB, Silami FD, da Garcia L, et al. Effect of various aging protocols and intermediate agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15(2):137–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves V, Felix M, Borges BCD, et al. Efficacy of accelerated aging methods to degrade the adhesive interface of dentin cavities bonded with etch-and-rinse adhesive systems AU – Chaves, Letícia Virgínia de Freitas. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016;30(19):2100–2108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng D, Yang H, Guo J, et al. Effects of different artificial ageing methods on the degradation of adhesive–dentine interfaces. J Dent. 2014;42(12):1577–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27(2):89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin SA, Noren JG. Marginal leakage in occlusally loaded, etched, class-II composite resin restorations. Acta Odontol Scand. 1991;49(4):247–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, et al. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater. 2001;17(4):340–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmowicz J, Phebus JG, Owens BM, et al. Microleakage of class I and II composite resin restorations using a sonic-resin placement system. Oper Dent. 2015;40(6):653–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behery H, El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, et al. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations. Dent Med Probl. 2018;55(4):383–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin A, D’Hoore W, Gonthier S, et al. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3(4):295–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alonso RC, Sinhoreti MA, Correr Sobrinho L, et al. Effect of resin liners on the microleakage of class V dental composite restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004;12(1):56–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgunaltay G. Microleakage of different resin composite types. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:790–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengo C, Spagnuolo G, Ametrano G, et al. Marginal leakage of bulk fill composites in Class II restorations: a microCT and digital microscope analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2015;60:123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale MS, Darvell BW, Cheung GS. Three-dimensional reconstruction of microleakage pattern using a sequential grinding technique. J Dent. 1994;22(6):370–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Santis R, Mollica F, Prisco D, et al. A 3D analysis of mechanically stressed dentin–adhesive–composite interfaces using X-ray micro-CT. Biomaterials. 2005;26:257–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirata R, Clozza E, Giannini M, et al. Shrinkage assessment of low shrinkage composites using micro-computed tomography. J Biomed Mater Res. 2015;103(4):798–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao XY, Li SB, Gu LJ, et al. Detection of marginal leakage of Class V restorations in vitro by micro-computed tomography. Oper Dent. 2014;39(2):174–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong R, Douglas WH. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res. 1983;62(1):32–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong R, Douglas WH. An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991;38(4):339–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay FR, Pashley DH, Garcia-Godoy F, et al. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part II. Silver tracer penetration evidence. Am J Dent. 2004;17:315–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera CA, Lan C, Escobar-Sanabria D, et al. The use of micro-CT with image segmentation to quantify leakage in dental restorations. Dent Mater. 2015;31(4):382–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirel G, Baltacıoğlu İH, Kolsuz ME, et al. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of internal void formation of bulk-fill resin composites in Class II restorations. Polym Compos. 2019;40:2984–2992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirata R, Pacheco RR, Caceres E, et al. Effect of sonic resin composite delivery on void formation assessed by micro-computed tomography. Oper Dent. 2018;43(2):144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, et al. In vitro degradation of resin-dentin bonds analyzed by microtensile bond test, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Biomaterials. 2003;24(21):3795–3803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84(2):118–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teshima I. Degradation of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate. J Dent Res. 2010;89(11):1281–1286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu KG, Stultz CM. Insight into the degradation of type-I collagen fibrils by MMP-8. J Mol Biol. 2013;425(10):1815–1825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodovici E, Reis A, Geraldeli S, et al. Does adhesive thickness affect resin-dentin bond strength after thermal/load cycling? Oper Dent. 2009;34(1):58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanches LKF, Lodovici E, Boaro LCC, et al. Influence of pH cycling and mechanical loading on the resin-dentin microtensile bond strength. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017;31(12):1386–1394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005;21(5):397–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanatta RF, Wiegand A, Dullin C, et al. Comparison of micro-CT and conventional dye penetration for microleakage assessment after different aging conditions. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019;89:161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saboia VP, Silva FC, Nato F, et al. Analysis of differential artificial ageing of the adhesive interface produced by a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. European journal of oral sciences. 2009;117(5):618–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, et al. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability-A systematic review. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:pii: E790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004;83(6):454–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Spencer P. Physiochemical interactions at the interfaces between self-etch adhesive systems and dentine. J Dent. 2004;32(7):567–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine . J Dent. 2012;40(6):475–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, et al. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater. 2005;21:375–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, et al. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):17–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu CK, King NM, Pashley DH, et al. Effect of resin hydrophilicity and water storage on resin strength. Biomaterials. 2004;25(26):5789–5796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, et al. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2003;16(6):414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, et al. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008;24(1):90–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, et al. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater. 2006;22(10):973–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing–a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 2003;16(1):6–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F, et al. In vivo preservation of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res. 2007;86(6):529–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar