Analysis of the influence of a new type of buccal tube base mesh design on the adhesive layer stress distribution and bond strength

References

• Sharma-Sayal SK, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV, et al. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;124(1):74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yüzbaşıoğlu E, Sayar-Torun G, Özcan M. Adhesion of orthodontic brackets to indirect laboratory-processed resin composite as a function of surface conditioning methods and artificial aging. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016;30(23):2565–2572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millett DT, McCabe JF. Orthodontic bonding with glass ionomer cement-a review. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18(4):385–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook R, Malkus D, Plesha M, et al. Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Knox J, Kralj B, Hubsch P, et al. An evaluation of the quality of orthodontic attachment offered by single- and double-mesh bracket bases using the finite element method of stress analysis. Angle Orthod. 2001;71(2):149–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sener-Yamaner ID, Ekici B, Sertgöz A, et al. Finite element analysis on the optimal material choice and cavity design parameters for MOD inlays exposed to different force vectors and magnitudes. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017;31:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier TA, Meira JBC, Rodrigues FP, et al. Finite element analysis of shear versus torsion adhesive strength tests for dental resin composites. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2009;23(10–11):1575–1589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossouw PE, Terblanche E. Use of finite element analysis in assessing stress distribution during debonding. J Clin Orthod. 1995;29(11):713–717.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alrbata RH, Momani MQ, Al-Tarawneh AM, et al. Optimal force magnitude loaded to orthodontic microimplants: a finite element analysis. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(2):221–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bica C, Brezeanu L, Bica D, et al. Biomechanical reactions due to orthodontic forces. A finite element study. Procedia Technol. 2015;19:895–900.
   Google Scholar
• Shetty P, Hegde AM, Rai K. Finite element method-an effective research tool for dentistry. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;34(3):281–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algera TJ, Feilzer AJ, Prahl-Andersen B, et al. A comparison of finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests of the bracket-cement-enamel system. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(6):608–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hioki M, Shin-Ya A, Nakahara R, et al. Shear bond strength and FEM of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement–effects of tooth enamel shape and orthodontic bracket base configuration. Dent Mater J. 2007;26(5):700–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox J, Jones ML, Hubsch P, et al. An evaluation of the stresses generated in a bonded orthodontic attachment by three different load cases using the finite element method of stress analysis. J Orthod. 2000;27(1):39–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elsaka SE, Hammad SM, Ibrahim NF. Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests. Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin CL, Huang SF, Tsai HC, et al. Finite element sub-modeling analyses of damage to enamel at the incisor enamel/adhesive interface upon de-bonding for different orthodontic bracket bases. J Biomech. 2011;44(1):134–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang WN, Li CH, Chou TH, et al. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125(1):65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABAQUS. Analysis user’s manual. Version 6.12. Warwick (RI): Dassault Systemes Simulia, Inc; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Merone G, Valletta R, De Santis R, et al. A novel bracket base design: biomechanical stability. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(2):219–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2(3):171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Abu Alhaija ES, Al-Wahadni AM. Evaluation of shear bond strength with different enamel pre-treatments. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(2):179–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talpur M, Cunningham SJ, Moles DR, et al. The relationship between base dimensions, force to failure, and shear bond strengths of bondable molar tubes. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(3):536–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith NR, Reynolds IR. A comparison of three bracket bases: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod. 1991;18(1):29–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudson AP, Grobler SR, Harris AM. Orthodontic molar brackets: the effect of three different base designs on shear bond strength. Int J Biomed Sci. 2011;7(1):27–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matasa CG. Orthodontic recycling at the crossroads. J Clin Orthod. 2003;37(3):133–139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maijer R, Smith DC. Variables influencing the bond strength of metal orthodontic bracket bases. Am J Orthod. 1981;79(1):20–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar