The effect of additional chlorhexidine and/or ethanol on the bond strength of universal adhesives

References

• Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, et al. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008;24(1):90–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alex G. Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry? Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36(1):15–26. quiz 8, 40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu Y, Tjaderhane L, Breschi L, et al. Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res. 2011;90(8):953–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frassetto A, Breschi L, Turco G, et al. Mechanisms of degradation of the hybrid layer in adhesive dentistry and therapeutic agents to improve bond durability-a literature review. Dent Mater. 2016;32(2):e41–e53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatini C, Pashley DH. Mechanisms regulating the degradation of dentin matrices by endogenous dentin proteases and their role in dental adhesion. A review. Am J Dent. 2014;27(4):203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, et al. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res. 2003;82(2):136–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashley DH, Tay F, Yiu C, et al. Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res. 2004;83(3):216–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrilho M, Geraldeli S, Tay F, et al. In vivo preservation of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res. 2007;86(6):529–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendron R, Grenier D, Sorsa T, et al. Inhibition of the activities of matrix metalloproteinases 2, 8, and 9 by chlorhexidine. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999;6(3):437–439.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breschi L, Cammelli F, Visintini E, et al. Influence of chlorhexidine concentration on the durability of etch-and-rinse dentin bonds: a 12-month in vitro study. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(3):191–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Nato F, et al. Chlorhexidine stabilizes the adhesive interface: a 2-year in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2010;26(4):320–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Tan J, Yang X, et al. Effect of chlorhexidine application in a self-etching adhesive on the immediate resin-dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12(1):27–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravić T, Comba A, Cunha SR, et al. Long-term bond strength and endogenous enzymatic activity of a chlorhexidine-containing commercially available adhesive. J Dent. 2019;84:60–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn J, Jung KH, Son SA, et al. Effect of additional etching and ethanol-wet bonding on the dentin bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives. Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40(1):68–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shin TP, Yao X, Huenergardt R, et al. Morphological and chemical characterization of bonding hydrophobic adhesive to dentin using ethanol wet bonding technique. Dent Mater. 2009;25(8):1050–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadenaro M, Breschi L, Rueggeberg FA, et al. Effect of adhesive hydrophilicity and curing time on the permeability of resins bonded to water vs. ethanol-saturated acid-etched dentin. Dent Mater. 2009;25(1):39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundh A, Molin M, Sjogren G. Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing. Dent Mater. 2005;21(5):476–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, et al. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1(4):299–309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, et al. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent. 2003;28(5):647–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27(2):89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francisconi LF, Scaffa PM, de Barros VR, et al. Glass ionomer cements and their role in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(5):364–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012;40(6):475–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll K, Fritzenschaft A, Haller B. In vitro comparison of dentin bonding systems: effect of testing method and operator. Quintessence Int. 2004;35(10):845–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian F, Zhou L, Zhang Z, et al. Paucity of nanolayering in resin-dentin interfaces of MDP-based adhesives. J Dent Res. 2016;95(4):380–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue N, Tsujimoto A, Takimoto M, et al. Surface free-energy measurements as indicators of the bonding characteristics of single-step self-etching adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(5):525–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza M. Y d, DI Nicoló R, Bresciani E. Influence of ethanol-wet dentin, adhesive mode of application, and aging on bond strength of universal adhesive. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loguercio AD, Hass V, Gutierrez MF, et al. Five-year effects of chlorhexidine on the in vitro durability of resin/dentin interfaces. J Adhes Dent. 2018;43(2):201– 242.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng P, Zaruba M, Attin T, et al. Effect of different matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors on microtensile bond strength of an etch-and-rinse and a self-etching adhesive to dentin. Oper Dent. 2015;40(1):80–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos EA, Correr GM, Leonardi DP, et al. Influence of chlorhexidine concentration on microtensile bond strength of contemporary adhesive systems. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23(3):340–345.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cadenaro M, Pashley DH, Marchesi G, et al. Influence of chlorhexidine on the degree of conversion and E-modulus of experimental adhesive blends. Dent Mater. 2009;25(10):1269–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatini C. Effect of a chlorhexidine-containing adhesive on dentin bond strength stability. Oper Dent. 2013;38(6):609–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing–a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 2003;16(1):6–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay F, Pashley DH, Kapur R, et al. Bonding BisGMA to dentin-a proof of concept for hydrophobic dentin bonding. J Dent Res. 2007;86(11):1034–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadek FT, Pashley DH, Nishitani Y, et al. Application of hydrophobic resin adhesives to acid-etched dentin with an alternative wet bonding technique . J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;84(1):19–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayar MK. Effect of simplified ethanol-wet bonding on microtensile bond strengths of dentin adhesive agents with different solvents. J Dent Sci. 2015;10(3):270–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães LA, Almeida JCF, Wang L, et al. Effectiveness of immediate bonding of etch-and-rinse adhesives to simplified ethanol-saturated dentin. Braz Oral Res. 2012;26(2):177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Liu X-Y, Zhang L, et al. Ethanol-wet bonding technique may enhance the bonding performance of contemporary etch-and-rinse dental adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14(2):113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilyurt C, Ayar MK, Yildirim T, et al. Effect of simplified ethanol-wet bonding on dentin bonding durability of etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(4):441–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Agee KA, Hoshika T, et al. Inhibition of MMPs by alcohols. Dent Mater. 2011;27(9):926–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res. 1990;69(1):36–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar