Influence of adhesive interface properties on the post-buckling response of composite I-stiffened panels with lateral support under axial compression

References

• Liu X, Han K, Bai R, et al. Buckling measurement and numerical analysis of M-type ribs stiffened composite panel. Thin Wall Struct. 2014;85:117–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramovich H, Govich D, Grunwald A. Buckling prediction of panels using the vibration correlation technique. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2015;78:62–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolanu NR, Raju G, Ramji M. Experimental and numerical studies on the buckling and post-buckling behavior of single blade-stiffened CFRP panels. Compos Struct. 2018;196:135–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai R, Bao S, Lei Z, et al. Experimental study on compressive behavior of I-stiffened CFRP panel using fringe projection profilomtry. Ocean Eng. 2018;160:382–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Bai R, Wang R, et al. Experimental study on compressive buckling behavior of J-stiffened composite panels. Opt Laser Eng. 2019;120:31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akterskaia M, Jansen E, Hallett SR, et al. Analysis of skin-stringer debonding in composite panels through a two-way global-local method. Compos Struct. 2018;202:1280–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang T, Sun W, Guan Z, et al. Experimental study on delamination growth of stiffened composite panels in compression after impact. Compos Struct. 2018;206:791–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeks C, Greenhalgh E, Falzon BG. Stiffener debonding mechanisms in post-buckled CFRP aerospace panels. Compos Part A: Appl S. 2005;36(7):934–946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisagni C, Vescovini R. Analytical formulation for local buckling and post-buckling analysis of stiffened laminated panels. Thin Wall Struct. 2009;47(3):318–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelstedt C, Schroder KU. Local post-buckling of hat-stringer-stiffened composite laminated plates under transverse compression. Compos Struct. 2010;92(12):2830–2844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vescovini R, Bisagni C. Two-step procedure for fast post-buckling analysis of composite stiffened panels. Compos Struct. 2013;128:38–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi AR, Darabi A, Anjabin N, et al. A mixed finite element and improved genetic algorithm method for maximizing buckling load of stiffened laminated composite plates. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2017;70:378–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo Y, Ge D, He B. Experiment and optimization of the hat-stringer-stiffened composite panels under axial compression. Compos Part B: Eng. 2016;84:285–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Sheikh AH, Ng CT, et al. An efficient finite element model for buckling analysis of grid stiffened laminated composite plates. Compos Struct. 2015;122:41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degenhardt R, Kling A, Rohwer K, et al. Design and analysis of stiffened composite panels including post-buckling and collapse. Compos Struct. 2008;86(9):919–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun W, Guan Z, Li Z, et al. Modeling and simulating of the compressive behavior of T-stiffened composite panels subjected to stiffener impact. Compos Struct. 2018;186:221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano F, Caprio FD, Auriemma B, et al. Numerical investigation on the failure phenomenon of stiffened composite panels in post-buckling regime with discrete damages. Eng Fail Anal. 2015;56:116–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrer T. Stiffness degradation of composite skin fields due to strength and buckling onset. Thin Wall Struct. 2017;119:522–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye Y, Zhu W, Jiang J, et al. Computational modeling of post-buckling behavior of composite T-stiffened panels with different bonding methods. Compos Part B: Eng. 2019;166:247–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun W, Guan Z, Ouyang T, et al. Effect of stiffener damage caused by low velocity impact on compressive buckling and failure modes of T-stiffened composite panels. Compos Struct. 2018;184:198–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Yan J, Chen Z, et al. Effect of the stiffener stiffness on the buckling and post-buckling behavior of stiffened composite panels – experimental investigation. Compos Struct. 2015;120:334–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo Y, Ge D, Zhou J. Experiment and analysis of hat-stringer-stiffened composite curved panels under axial compression. Compos Struct. 2015;123:150–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XM, Cao W, Deng CH, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis for the post-buckling behavior of stiffened composite panels with impact damage. Compos Struct. 2015;133:840–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masood SN, Vishakh R, Viswamurthy SR, et al. Influence of stiffener configuration on post-buckled response of composite panels with impact damages. Compos Struct. 2018;194:433–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo F, Esposito R, Perugini P, et al. Numerical-experimental investigation on post-buckled stiffened composite panels. Compos Struct. 2002;55(3):347–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Du K, Hao P, et al. Numerically and experimentally predicted knockdown factors for stiffened shells under axial compression. Thin Wall Struct. 2016;109:13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boni L, Fanteria D, Lanciotti A. Post-buckling behavior of flat stiffened composite panels: experiments vs. analysis. Compos Struct. 2012;94(12):3421–3433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch C, Murphy A, Price M, et al. The computational post buckling analysis of fuselage stiffened panels loaded in compression. Thin Wall Struct. 2004;42(10):1445–1464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh E, Meeks C, Clarke A, et al. The effect of defects on the performance of post-buckled CFRP stringer-stiffened panels. Compos Part A: Appl S. 2003;34(7):623–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H, Yan Y, Zhang T, et al. Progressive failure and experimental study of adhesively bonded composite single-lap joints subjected to axial tensile loads. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016;30(8):894–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azam A, Mubashar A, Ashcroft IA, et al. A numerical study of the effect of ply-layup on the strength and stiffness of a composite T-joint under three point bending. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017;31(19–20):2124–2138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Q, Liu B, Xie W. The tension failure mechanisms of composite stepped bonding repairs and joints for the aircraft primary load-bearing structures. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2019;33(7):675–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Luo H, Zhang H, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of adhesively bonded carbon/carbon composites subjected to interlaminar shear loads. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2019;33(20):2207–2226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadioglu F, Demiral M. Failure behaviour of the single lap joints of angle-plied composites under three point bending tests. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2020;34(5):531–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashin Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech. 1980;47(2):329–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labeas G, Belesis S, Stamatelos D. Interaction of damage failure and post-buckling behavior of composite plates with cut-outs by progressive damage modeling. Compos Part B: Eng. 2008;39(2):304–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simulia DS. ABAQUS 6.14 user’s manual. Providence (RI): Dassault Systems; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kim GH, Choi JH, Kweon JH. Manufacture and performance evolution of the composite hat-stiffened panel. Compos Struct. 2010;92(9):2276–2284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Chen P. Prediction of compressive-after-edge-impact (CAEI) behavior in composite panel stiffened with I-shaped stiffeners. Compos Part B: Eng. 2017;110:402–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar