A numerical study on the bonding of the thin-walled and large-deformation composite components

References

• Irwin RJ, Vander Veen JA, Buchner-Santos E, et al. Low-mass deployable spacecraft booms. AIAA Sp Conf Expo. 2010;2010:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Murphey TW. Historical Perspectives on the Development of Deployable Reflectors.50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures,Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sickinger C, Herbeck L, Breitbach E. Structural engineering on deployable CFRP booms for a solar propelled sailcraft. Acta Astronaut. 2006;58(4):185–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Chen W, Li R, et al. Mechanical characteristics of deployable composite thin-walled lenticular tubes. Compos Struct. 2016;153:601–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song MG, Kweon JH, Choi JH, et al. Effect of manufacturing methods on the shear strength of composite single-lap bonded joints. Compos Struct. 2010;92(9):2194–2202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jairaja R, Naik GN. Strengthening of the adhesive bond using a mixture of adhesives between dissimilar adherends in a single lap joint. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2020;34(6):579–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanerva M, Saarela O. The peel ply surface treatment for adhesive bonding of composites: a review. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2013;43:60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MS, Tong L, Falzon PJ. Influence of metal surface preparation on its surface profile, contact angle, surface energy and adhesion with glass fibre prepreg. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2014;51:32–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Encinas N, Oakley BR, Belcher MA, et al. Surface modification of aircraft used composites for adhesive bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2014;50:157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Ehrhardt M, Lorenz P, et al. Influence of surface treatment with infrared nanosecond laser on adhesion performance of adhesion-bonded carbon fiber/epoxy composite. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2020;34(13):1399–1425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaldivar RJ, Steckel GL, Morgan BA, et al. Bonding optimization on composite surfaces using atmospheric plasma treatment. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2012;26:381–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenas JM, Narbón JJ, Alía C. Optimum adhesive thickness in structural adhesives joints using statistical techniques based on Weibull distribution. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2010;30(3):160–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan K, Hu X, Mai YW. Substrate constraint and adhesive thickness effects on fracture toughness of adhesive joints. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2004;18(1):39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias JD, Lemaire M. Reliability analysis of bonded joints with variations in adhesive thickness. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2013;27(10):1069–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anyfantis KN, Tsouvalis NG. Loading and fracture response of CFRP-to-steel adhesively bonded joints with thick adherents – part I: experiments. Compos Struct. 2013;96:850–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutar Y, Naïmi S, Mezlini S, et al. Effect of adhesive thickness and surface roughness on the shear strength of aluminium one-component polyurethane adhesive single-lap joints for automotive applications. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016;30(17):1913–1929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aga ZA, Woldesenbet E. Bond thickness effect on impact response and damage of adhesively-bonded graphite/epoxy composites. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2007;21(1):21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji G, Ouyang Z, Li G, et al. Effects of adhesive thickness on global and local mode-I interfacial fracture of bonded joints. Int J Solids Struct. 2010;47(18-19):2445–2458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daei-Sorkhabi AH, Hosseinzadeh-Nodehi SF. Numerical study of the effect of carbon fiber/epoxy resin adhesive thickness on the creep behaviour of carbon steel plate joints. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2019;33(16):1790–1805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleich DM, Van Tooren MJL, Beukers A. Analysis and evaluation of bondline thickness effects on failure load in adhesively bonded structures. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2001;15(9):1091–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tooren MJL, Gleich DM, Beukers A. Experimental verification of a stress singularity model to predict the effect of bondline thickness on joint strength. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2004;18(4):395–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao L, Huang C, Sawa T. Effect of adhesive thickness, adhesive type and scarf angle on the mechanical properties of scarf adhesive joints. Int J Solids Struct. 2013;50(25-26):4333–4340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishore AN, Prasad NS. An experimental study of Flat-Joggle-Flat bonded joints in composite laminates. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2012;35:55–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Yan Y, Zhang T, et al. Experimental study of adhesively bonded CFRP joints subjected to tensile loads. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2015;57:95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neto JABP, Campilho RDSG, Da Silva LFM. Parametric study of adhesive joints with composites. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2012;37:96–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis PNB, Ferreira JAM, Antunes F. Effect of adherends rigidity on the shear strength of single lap adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2011;31(4):193–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozel A, Yazici B, Akpinar S, et al. A study on the strength of adhesively bonded joints with different adherends. Compos Part B Eng. 2014;62:167–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu ZY, Lei Y. Design theory and dynamic analysis of a deployable boom. Mech Mach Theory. 2014;71:126–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar