1,577
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Does Al2O3 airborne particle abrasion improve repair bond strength of universal adhesives to aged and non-aged nanocomposites?

, , , , &
Pages 2275-2287 | Received 06 Jan 2021, Accepted 25 Jan 2021, Published online: 09 Feb 2021

References

  • Araujo CTP, Prieto LT, Costa DC, et al. Active application of primer acid on acid-treated enamel: influence on the bond effectiveness of self-etch adhesives systems. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80(8):943–949.
  • Fu J, Saikaew P, Kawano S, et al. Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2017;33(8):895–903.
  • Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent. 2003;31(8):521–525.
  • Kupiec KA, Barkmeier WW. Laboratory evaluation of surface treatments for composite repair. Oper Dent. 1996;21(2):59–62.
  • Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent. 1998;26(8):685–694.
  • Teixeira EC, Bayne SC, Thompson JY, et al. Shear bond strength of self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:159–164.
  • Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent. 2008;36(12):969–976.
  • Padipatvuthikul P, Mair LH. Bonding of composite to water aged composite with surface treatments. Dent Mater. 2007;23(4):519–525.
  • Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119(4):316–322.
  • AlJehani YA, Baskaradoss JK, Geevarghese A, et al. Shear bond strength between fiber-reinforced composite and veneering resin composites with various adhesive resin systems. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(5):392–401.
  • Özcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, et al. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater. 2007;23(10):1276–1282.
  • Duran I, Ural Ç, Yılmaz B, et al. Effects of Er:YAG laser pretreatment with different energy levels on bond strength of repairing composite materials. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015;33(6):320–325.
  • Belli R, Sartori N, Peruchi LD, et al. Slow progression of dentin bond degradation during one-year water storage under simulated pulpal pressure. J Dent. 2010;38(10):802–810.
  • Loomans B, Özcan M. Intraoral repair of direct and indirect restorations: procedures and guidelines. Oper Dent. 2016;41:68–78.
  • Özcan M, Corazza PH, Marocho SM, et al. Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing. Clin Oral Invest. 2013;17(7):1751–1758.
  • Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, et al. Minimal intervention dentistry-a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J. 2000;50(1):1–12.
  • Martos R, Hegedüs V, Szalóki M, et al. A randomised controlled study on the effects of different surface treatments and adhesive self-etch functional monomers on the immediate repair bond strength and integrity of the repaired resin composite interface. J Dent. 2019;85:57–63.
  • Flury S, Dulla FA, Peutzfeldt A. Repair bond strength of resin composite to restorative materials after short- and long-term storage. Dent Mater. 2019;35(9):1205–1213.
  • Kanzow P, Baxter S, Rizk M, et al. Effectiveness of a universal adhesive for repair bonding to composite and amalgam. J Oral Sci. 2019;61(2):343–350.
  • Sau CW, Oh GS, Koh H, et al. Shear bond strength of repaired composite resins using a hybrid composite resin. Oper Dent. 1999;24(3):156–161.
  • Nagano D, Nakajima M, Takahashi M, et al. effect of water aging of adherend composite on repair bond strength of nanofilled composites. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20:425–433.
  • Alqarni D, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, et al. The repair bond strength to resin matrix in cured resin composites after water aging. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(2):233–240.
  • Shawkat ES, Shortall AC, Addison O, et al. Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2009;25(11):1338–1346.
  • Altinci P, Mutluay M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2018;4(1):10–19.
  • Magne P, Malta DAMP, Enciso R, et al. Heat treatment influences monomer conversion and bond strength of indirect composite resin restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(6):559–566.
  • Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, et al. Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatments and bonding agents. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21(4):251–260.
  • Wendler M, Belli R, Panzer R, et al. Repair bond strength of aged resin composite after different surface and bonding treatments. Materials. 2016;9(7):547–574.
  • Blum IR, Hafiana K, Curtis A, et al. The effect of surface conditioning on the bond strength of resin composite to amalgam. J Dent. 2012;40(1):15–21.
  • Söderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res. 1991;99(2):173–180.
  • da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, et al. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent. 2012;40(6):513–521.
  • Papacchini F, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi N, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:25–31.
  • Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations-criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater. 2013;29(1):28–50.
  • Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Silanising agents promote resin-composite repair. Int Dent J. 2015;65(6):311–315.
  • Swift EJ, Le Valley BD, Boyer DB. Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater. 1992;8(6):362–365.
  • Bouschlicher MR, Reindhardt JW, Vargas MA. Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent. 1997;10:279–283.
  • Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, et al. Effect of combinations of surface treat- ments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77(2):122–126.
  • Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, et al. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(2):90–98.
  • Perdigão J, Loguercio AD. Universal or multi-mode adhesives: why and how? J Adhes Dent. 2014;16:193–194.
  • de Medeiros TC, de Lima MR, Bessa SC, et al. Repair bond strength of bulk fill composites after different adhesion protocols. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11:e1000.
  • Çakir NN, Demirbuga S, Balkaya H, et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesives on composite repairs, with or without silane application. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(3):263–268.
  • Ritter AV, Sulaiman TA, Altitinchi A, et al. Composite-composite adhesion as a function of adhesive-composite material and surface treatment. Oper Dent. 2019;44(4):348–354.
  • Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, et al. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):17–28.
  • Lima AD, de Vicente Leite T, Palialol AM, et al. Effect of surface conditioning methods, adhesive systems and resin composite on repair strength of dimethacrylate and silorane resin composites. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016;30(24):2736–2744.
  • Mumcu E, Erdemir U, Özsoy A, et al. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of repair composite to indirect restorative materials. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2019;33(21):2369–2384.