Effect of fiber surface modifications on the interfacial adhesion in kevlar fiber reinforced polymer composites

References

• Fujun X, Wangxizi F, Yinnan Z, et al. Modification of tensile, wear and interfacial properties of kevlar fibers under cryogenic treatment. Compos Part B. 2017;116:398–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalal N, Jiajun L, Kelsey S, et al. Enhanced interfacial strength of aramid fiber reinforced composites through adsorbed aramid nanofiber coatings. Compos Sci Technol. 2019;174:125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marouen H, Mohamed NS, Johannes AP. Improving the adhesion strength of polymers: effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2020;34:1853–1870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin TK, Kuo BH, Shyu SS, et al. Improvement of the adhesion of Kevlar fiber to bismaleimide resin by surface chemical modification. J Adhes Sci Technol. 1999;13(5):545–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarantili PA, Andreopoulos AG. Mechanical properties of epoxies reinforced with chloride-treated aramid fibers. J Appl Polym Sci. 1997;65(2):267–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shed GS, Lin TK, Shyu SS, et al. Improvement of adhesion of Kevlar fiber to epoxy by chemical modification. J Adhes Sci Technol. 1994;8(5):511–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Huang YD, Zhang ZQ, et al. Ultrasonic treatment of aramid fiber surface and its effect on the interface of aramid/epoxy composites. Appl Surf Sci. 2008;254(9):2594–2599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee M, Das CK, Kharitonov AP. Effect of compatibilizer on the properties of fluorinated and oxy-fluorinated short kevlar fiber reinforced EP. J Reinf Plast Comp. 2008;27(5):523–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oromiehie A, Ebadi-Dehaghani H, Mirbagheri S. Chemical modification of polypropylene by maleic anhydride: melt grafting, characterization and mechanism. Int J Chem Eng Appl. 2014;5(2):117–122.
   Google Scholar
• Bikramjit S, Rahul C, Rajeev M. Effect of surface treatment of nanoclay on the mechanical properties of epoxy/glass fiber/clay nanocomposites. Compos Interface. 2016;23(7):623–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin GK, Ilbeom C, Dai GL. Flame and silane treatments for improving the adhesive bonding characteristics of aramid/epoxy composites. Compos Struct. 2011;93(11):2696–2705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caixia J, Ping C, Wei L, et al. Surface treatment of aramid fiber by air dielectric barrier discharge plasma at atmospheric pressure. Appl Surf Sci. 2011;257(9):4165–4170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan YZ, Lian JJ, Huang Y, et al. Two-step surface treatment of 3D braided carbon/kevlar hybrid fabric and influence on mechanical performance of its composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;429(1–2):304–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jianrui C, Yaofeng Z, Qingqing N, et al. Surface modification and characterization of aramid fibers with hybrid coating. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;321:103–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J. Effect of surface treatment on the structure and properties of para-aramid fibers by phosphoric acid. Fibers Polym. 2013;14(1):59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Cheng XH. Effect of surface treatment on the mechanical and tribological performance of kevlar pulp reinforced epoxy composites. Tribol Lett. 2006;24(3):195–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lixin X, Li L, Yudong H, et al. Enhanced interfacial properties of domestic aramid fiber-12 via high energy gamma ray irradiation. Compos Part B. 2015;69:50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tie-Min L, Yuan-Suo Z, Jie H. Surface modification of aramid fibers with novel chemical approach. Polym Bull. 2011;66:259–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar CS, Arumugam V, Sengottuvelusamy R, et al. Failure strength prediction of glass/epoxy composite laminates from acoustic emission parameters using artificial neural network. Appl Acoust. 2017;115:32–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar CS, Arumugam V, Santulli C. Characterization of indentation damage resistance of hybrid composite laminates using acoustic emission monitoring. Compos Part B. 2017;111:165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shruthi K, Saravanakumar K, Arumugam V, et al. Effect of patch hybridisation on indentation resistance and residual performance of patch repaired glass/epoxy laminates using acoustic emission monitoring. Nondestruct Test Eval. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2020.1834556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar CS, Saravana Kumar K, Arumugam V. Characterization of failure mechanism in glass, carbon and their hybrid composite laminates in epoxy resin by acoustic emission monitoring. Nondestruct Test Eval. 2019;34(3):254–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanakumar K, Suresh Kumar C, Arumugam V. Damage monitoring of glass/epoxy laminates with different interply fiber orientation using acoustic emission. Struct Health Monit. 2021;20(2):445–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayababu A, Arumugam V, Rajesh B, et al. Damage characterization in glass/epoxy composite laminates under normal and oblique planes of cyclic indentation loading with AE monitoring. Mater Eval. 2021;79(1):61–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutkin R, Green CJ, Vangrattanachai S, et al. On acoustic emission for failure investigation in CFRP: pattern recognition and peak frequency analyses. Mech Syst Signal Pr. 2011;25(4):1393–1407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar CS, Fotouhi M, Saeedifar M, et al. Acoustic emission based investigation on the effect of temperature and hybridization on drop weight impact and post-impact residual strength of hemp and basalt fibres reinforced polymer composite laminates. Compos Part B. 2019;173:106962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar CS, Arumugam V, Jack JK, et al. Experimental investigation on the effect of glass fiber orientation on impact damage resistance under cyclic indentation loading using AE monitoring. Nondestruct Test Eval. 2020;35(4):408–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahid E, Mostafa K, Ahmed HT, et al. Robust clustering of acoustic emission signals using neural networks and signal subspace projections. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. 2003;3:276–286.
   Google Scholar
• Jayababu A, Arumugam V, Rajesh B, et al. Investigation of indentation damage resistance on normal and inclined plane of glass/epoxy composite laminates using acoustic emission monitoring. J Compos Mater. 2020;54(21):2953–2964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claire De Marco MF, Jeremy C, Charles C. Impact damage testing on composite marine sandwich panels. Part 2: instrumented drop weight. J Sandw Struct Mater. 2014;16(5):443–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdi H, Vahid M, Hashem B, et al. The influence of carbon nanotubes on quasi-static puncture resistance and yarn pull-out behavior of shear-thickening fluids (STFs) impregnated woven fabrics. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2016;88:263–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayanta M, Chacko J, Ram Prakash S. Effect of surface fluorination of Poly (p-Phenylene Terephthalamide) fiber. Defence Sci J. 2014;64(3):230–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Qiang Z, Zhu L, et al. Effect of calcium chloride on the surface properties of kevlar fiber. J Appl Polym. 2015;132(4):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM International. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh C, Hrishi R, Arumugam V, et al. Effect of hydrolytic ageing on kevlar/polyester using acoustic emission monitoring. J Nondestruct Eval. 2012;31(2):140–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar