Evaluation of bonding strength of universal adhesives to aged composite resin

References

• Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine–Old wine in new bottles? J Dent. 2015;43(5):525–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Chae SY, Lee Y, et al. Effects of multipurpose, universal adhesives on resin bonding to zirconia ceramic. Oper Dent. 2015;40(1):55–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikaew P, Fu J, Chowdhury A, et al. Effect of air-blowing time and long-term storage on bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(6):2629–2635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujimoto A, Shimatani Y, Nojiri K, et al. Influence of surface wetness on bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse mode. Eur J Oral Sci. 2019;127(2):162–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikaew P, Matsumoto M, Chowdhury A, et al. Does shortened application time affect long-term bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin? Oper Dent. 2018;43(5):549–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seabra B, Arantes-Oliveira S, Portugal J. Influence of multimode universal adhesives and zirconia primer application techniques on zirconia repair. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(2):182–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Sonoda A, et al. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in ‘universal’ adhesives. Dent Mater. 2016;32(10):1218–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, et al. Interfacial characteristics and bond durability of universal adhesive to various substrates. Oper Dent. 2017;42(2):E59–E70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanzow P, Baxter S, Rizk M, et al. Effectiveness of a universal adhesive for repair bonding to composite and amalgam. J Oral Sci. 2019;61(2):343–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakir NN, Demirbuga S, Balkaya H, et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesives on composite repairs, with or without silane application. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(3):263–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brendeke J, Ozcan M. Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Ebert J, et al. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent. 2003;16:17–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, et al. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):701–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacchini F, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi N, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:25–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilo R, Brosh T, Geron V, et al. Effect of silane reaction time on the repair of a nanofilled composite using tribochemical treatment. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(2):125–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Ozcan M, et al. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(2):155–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hisamatsu N, Atsuta M, Matsumura H. Effect of silane primers and unfilled resin bonding agents on repair bond strength of a prosthodontic microfilled composite. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(7):644–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Opdam NJ, et al. Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair. J Dent. 2011;39(7):499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, et al. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater. 2007;23(10):1276–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e78-93–e93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrow MF, Thomas D, Swain MV, et al. Analysis of tensile bond strengths using Weibull statistics. Biomaterials. 2004;25(20):5031–5035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornazari IA, Brum RT, Rached RN, et al. Reliability and correlation between microshear and microtensile bond strength tests of composite repairs. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;103:103607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comba L, Tichy A, Bradna P. The effect of censoring on the statistical evaluation of composite-to-composite bond strength. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(2):183–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 29022. Dentistry-adhesion-notched-edge shear bondstrength test. 1st ed. Geneva, Switzerland: InternationalOrganization for Standardization; 2013. p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Valente LL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Goncalves AP, et al. Repair bond strength of dental composites: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016;69:15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padipatvuthikul P, Mair LH. Bonding of composite to water aged composite with surface treatments. Dent Mater. 2007;23(4):519–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente LL, Silva MF, Fonseca AS, et al. Effect of diamond bur grit size on composite repair. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17:257–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tani C, Finger WJ. Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-in-one self-etching priming adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4:283–289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J, Jr, et al. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, et al. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(2):90–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdigao J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51:333–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsujimoto A, Iwasa M, Shimamura Y, et al. Enamel bonding of single-step self-etch adhesives: influence of surface energy characteristics. J Dent. 2010;38(2):123–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, et al. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent. 2012;40(6):513–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, et al. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent. 2002;30(2–3):83–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007;28(26):3757–3785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17:7–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes AL, Castillo-Oyague R, Lynch CD, et al. Influence of sandblasting granulometry and resin cement composition on microtensile bond strength to zirconia ceramic for dental prosthetic frameworks. J Dent. 2013;41(1):31–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaoka N, Yoshihara K, Feitosa VP, et al. Chemical interaction mechanism of 10-MDP with zirconia. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morresi AL, D’Amario M, Capogreco M, et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;29:295–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27(2):89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crim GA, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. Comparison of four thermocycling techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53(1):50–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sai K, Shimamura Y, Takamizawa T, et al. Influence of degradation conditions on dentin bonding durability of three universal adhesives. J Dent. 2016;54:56–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H, et al. Influence of thermal cycling on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent. 1998;11:118–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki S, Takamizawa T, Imai A, et al. Bond durability of universal adhesive to bovine enamel using self-etch mode. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(3):1113–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral M, Belli R, Cesar PF, et al. The potential of novel primers and universal adhesives to bond to zirconia. J Dent. 2014;42(1):90–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater. 2012;28(5):467–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelotti G, Niedzwiecki M, Bidjan D, et al. Silane effect of universal adhesive on the composite-composite repair bond strength after different surface pretreatments. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(4):950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZY, Tian FC, Niu LN, et al. Defying ageing: an expectation for dentine bonding with universal adhesives? J Dent. 2016;45:43–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed MH, De MJ, Van Landuyt K, et al. Do universal adhesives benefit from an extra bonding layer? J Adhes Dent. 2019;21:117–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar